Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
1000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-19
2027-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Screening Emotions in Adolescents at the Hospital for mTBI
NCT06370520
Targeted Evaluation, Action, & Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT02657135
Telephone Intervention After Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT00483522
Neurocognitive Evaluation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Hospitalized Pediatric Population
NCT00715949
Written Versus Verbal Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT02252315
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Additionally, a pre/post intervention will be layered upon the randomized educational intervention to evaluate the effects of the information technology decision support tool (i.e. eMR) in isolation of the clinician education intervention. The 32-month mTBI patient enrollment period will be divided into two 16 months segments. The first 16 months will be without the eMR intervention being visible, and the remaining 16 months post eMR screening and decision support deployment in the ED and UC. This study design allows us to evaluate the independent and interactive effects of the decision support tool and educational intervention.
Enrolled children will be followed for up to three months post injury to ascertain the effect of the interventions on the primary aim (reduction of school problems/performance) and secondary aims.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TEaM Intervention Group
Dedicated Provider Education plus Information Technology Support. The IT support includes addition of an eMR concussion screening, followed by an alert to the provider, followed by a structured assessment / evaluation template.
TEaM Intervention
Multi-setting mTBI (mild traumatic brain injury) Evaluation and Management Intervention incorporates provider education and information technology support systems, based on the best available evidence and tailored to a specific environment (acute care setting vs primary care clinic). Facilitates linkages between providers (ED/UC to primary care) and systems (healthcare to school).
* Provider Training Modules: Training includes decision-making support alerted by positive triage screening and concussion-specific eMR template
* Management based on current best practices (however, may have additional education from the provider training)
* Return to school letters
* Primary Care Follow Up
Control Group
Standard medical protocol for the management of mTBI in children. This group will not receive interventional Provider Training on the TEaM concussion evaluation examination and utilization of the eMR template.
Standard of Care
Continue with CHOA current best practices for mTBI:
* No TEaM Provider training (but will be offered to all providers at end of study)
* Will not be trained on utilization and implementation of the concussion screening alert and eMR template
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TEaM Intervention
Multi-setting mTBI (mild traumatic brain injury) Evaluation and Management Intervention incorporates provider education and information technology support systems, based on the best available evidence and tailored to a specific environment (acute care setting vs primary care clinic). Facilitates linkages between providers (ED/UC to primary care) and systems (healthcare to school).
* Provider Training Modules: Training includes decision-making support alerted by positive triage screening and concussion-specific eMR template
* Management based on current best practices (however, may have additional education from the provider training)
* Return to school letters
* Primary Care Follow Up
Standard of Care
Continue with CHOA current best practices for mTBI:
* No TEaM Provider training (but will be offered to all providers at end of study)
* Will not be trained on utilization and implementation of the concussion screening alert and eMR template
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary practice in either ED, UC, and/or PCP
* School age (5-18 yoa)
* Evaluated in ED / UC / PCP within 72 hours of injury
* Discharged home from ED / UC / PCP (e.g., not admitted to hospital)
* Meets above inclusion for retrospective portion plus:
* mTBI likely present as defined by:
* Positive diagnosis by clinician or mTBI OR
* Positive triage screen plus positive symptom checklist
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to fulfill study training / education requirements
* Non-English speaking
* Known severe developmental delay or known severe psychiatric history
* Known prior severe brain injury
* Known mTBI within past 3 months
* First mTBI visit outside of CHOA network
* Does not meet above exclusion for retrospective portion plus:
* Requests to Opt-Out via e-mail or first phone contact
* Inability or unwillingness to provide verbal informed telephone consent/assent
5 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
OTHER
Emory University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Wright
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Wright, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA) - Egleston Emergency Department
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta- Forsyth, Northpoint and Town Center Urgent Care Centers
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta- Primary Care Offices
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00108674
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.