Improving In-hospital and Post-discharge Patient Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT ID: NCT06595914
Last Updated: 2025-07-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
5831 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-11
2027-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Brief Educational Intervention to Improve Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Screening Outcomes
NCT01558791
Cognitive-Communication Screening and Early Therapy for Adults With Mild TBI
NCT03230656
Mild TBI Assessment & Rehabilitation
NCT02920788
Written Versus Verbal Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT02252315
Improving Outcomes After Traumatic Injury: A Goal Management Approach
NCT01714531
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Clinicians
Clinician participants will all have access to any clinical implementation strategies that are developed and disseminated in the project.
Clinical implementation strategies
Clinical implementation strategies, selected based on ED clinician survey/interview findings from Aim 1 using the Implementing Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) implementation science framework
Patients-Survey Cohort
Patient participants will be observationally followed via survey during the study to monitor patient-reported outcomes.
No interventions assigned to this group
Patients-Chart Review Only
Patients who are not in the survey study but who meet other eligibility criteria will undergo chart review to provide electronic health record-based outcomes.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinical implementation strategies
Clinical implementation strategies, selected based on ED clinician survey/interview findings from Aim 1 using the Implementing Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) implementation science framework
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
• Faculty attending physician, advanced practice professional (APP), resident, fellow, or nurse who practices in an eligible Froedtert \& Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) emergency department
Patients-Survey Cohort:
* Seen and discharged from a Froedtert \& MCW emergency department.
* Age 18 or older.
* Has a clinical diagnosis of TBI, as reflected by a relevant International Classification of Disease-10th Edition (ICD-10) code or other evidence (e.g., diagnosis and educational information in the After Visit Summary)
* Speaks English or Spanish.
Patients-Chart Review Only:
* Seen and discharged from a Froedtert \& MCW emergency department.
* Age 18 or older.
* Has a clinical diagnosis of TBI, as reflected by a relevant ICD-10 code or other evidence (e.g., diagnosis and educational information in the After Visit Summary).
Exclusion Criteria
• Providers that do not practice in a Froedtert \& Medical College of Wisconsin emergency department.
Patients-Survey Cohort.
* In protective custody.
* On psychiatric hold.
* Is not own decision maker (e.g., activated healthcare power of attorney).
* Indicated Do Not Contact in their research contact preferences.
* Left the emergency department prematurely (e.g., against medical advice).
* History of serious health condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with engagement in or validity of the survey (e.g., active thought disorder; terminal cancer; dementia).
Patients-Chart Review Only:
• Minors under the age of 18.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity
FED
Ohio State University
OTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lindsay Nelson
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NE, Wade DT. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol. 1995 Sep;242(9):587-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00868811.
Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HT9425-24-1-0376
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PRO00051478
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.