Functional Connectivity and Predictors of Affective Aprosodia Intervention in Subacute Right Hemisphere Stroke

NCT ID: NCT04575909

Last Updated: 2024-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-01

Study Completion Date

2024-03-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is an investigation of a behavioral speech and language treatment for emotional prosody recognition and production deficits in subacute right hemisphere stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The phrase, "it's not what you say, but how you say it" neatly sums up prosody - the changes to one's tone of voice that transmit meaning. Changes to speech rate, rhythm, volume, and pitch to convey emotion fall into the category of affective, or emotional, prosody. That is, the changes made to the voice to express feelings, such as happy or sad.

Following damage to the right side of the brain, such as in stroke, difficulties in affective prosody understanding and use have been observed. These findings have led researchers to view the right hemisphere as playing a critical role for emotional prosody. Affective prosody difficulties do not always spontaneously improve after acute right hemisphere stroke, and only a few evidenced-based treatments are available for these individuals. It is also understood that affective prosody difficulties can negatively impact social interactions and relationships, including those who care for individuals with emotional prosody difficulties. With miscommunication frequently occurring between those living with affective prosody disorders and those with whom these people interact, the risk of reduced quality of life and social isolation is possible and could be related to poorer health outcomes. Not only might there be personal burdens associated with poor management of communication difficulties in right hemisphere stroke and dementia, but there might also be economic burdens as well. In addition to counseling caregivers, family, and friends about the communication changes of loved ones, more evidenced-based speech and language treatment options are needed for those living with affective prosody disorders.

Cognitive-Linguistic and Speech-Language Assessment: During baseline testing, detailed speech-language and cognitive-communication behavioral testing will occur, focusing on aprosodia, awareness, motor speech, attention, verbal working memory, executive function, discourse, social participation, and emotion. Detailed testing focusing on aprosodia will occur after each Intervention Phase.

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Resting state functional connectivity as measured via functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) will be assessed at Baseline, Post Phase I, and Post Phase II testing time points to track longitudinal change in functional connectivity patterns associated with targeted aprosodia intervention.

Aprosodia Intervention Phase: The aprosodia intervention will target receptive and expressive prosody over the course of four (4) weeks (12 sessions total). The receptive prosody intervention phase will occur for two weeks (6 sessions total, 3 sessions/week), and the expressive prosody intervention phase will occur for two weeks (6 sessions total, 3 sessions/week). Within each phase, the types of cues participants receive will also vary. Half of the expressive prosody intervention phase will use explicit cues (3 sessions total, 1 week), and the other half of the expressive prosody intervention phase will use implicit cues (3 sessions total, 1 week). This same setup for expressive prosody intervention phase will be used in the receptive prosody intervention phase. In addition to these implicit and explicit cues, expressive prosody intervention will also include feedback to increase awareness.

No-Intervention Phase: Participants will meet study personnel with the same frequency and duration (3 sessions/week, \~1 hour/session) during the No-Intervention Phase as during REACT. Sessions will comprise conversation about current events, recovery progress (including speech therapy goals targeted in outside intervention \[if relevant\]), hobbies, and other similar topics.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Right Hemispheric Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

A crossover trial design with randomized order of intervention (REACT/no-intervention, no-intervention/REACT). Half of participants will be randomly assigned to REACT in Phase I, and the other half will be randomly assigned to start with no-intervention in Phase I. In Phase II, participants will receive the alternative intervention not received during Phase I.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Key personnel will be blinded to participant testing timepoint by having separate personnel administer treatment and assessments for each participant.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Explicit Expressive Prosody Intervention

Explicit cues will be provided to help participants improve expression of targeted affective prosody.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aprosodia Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Intervention will focus on improving participants' use and understanding of emotional prosody using implicit and explicit cues, biofeedback, modeling, and feedback.

Implicit Expressive Prosody Intervention

Implicit cues will be provided to help participants improve expression of targeted affective prosody.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aprosodia Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Intervention will focus on improving participants' use and understanding of emotional prosody using implicit and explicit cues, biofeedback, modeling, and feedback.

Explicit Receptive Prosody Intervention

Explicit cues will be provided to help participants improve recognition of targeted affective prosody.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aprosodia Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Intervention will focus on improving participants' use and understanding of emotional prosody using implicit and explicit cues, biofeedback, modeling, and feedback.

Implicit Receptive Prosody Intervention

Implicit cues will be provided to help participants improve recognition of targeted affective prosody.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aprosodia Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Intervention will focus on improving participants' use and understanding of emotional prosody using implicit and explicit cues, biofeedback, modeling, and feedback.

No-Intervention

Sessions will comprise conversation about current events, recovery progress (including speech therapy goals targeted in outside intervention \[if relevant\]), hobbies, and other similar topics.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No-Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sessions will comprise conversation about current events, recovery progress (including speech therapy goals targeted in outside intervention \[if relevant\]), hobbies, and other similar topics.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Aprosodia Intervention

Intervention will focus on improving participants' use and understanding of emotional prosody using implicit and explicit cues, biofeedback, modeling, and feedback.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

No-Intervention

Sessions will comprise conversation about current events, recovery progress (including speech therapy goals targeted in outside intervention \[if relevant\]), hobbies, and other similar topics.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ischemic stroke to the right cerebral hemisphere
* No history of other significant neurological disease or injury affecting the brain (excluding prior lacunar stroke, asymptomatic stroke, or TIA)
* Proficient speaker of English prior to stroke per self-report
* Capable of providing informed consent or indicating another to provide informed consent
* Ages 18-89
* Demonstration of receptive and/or expressive aprosodia on standardized measures of aprosodia
* Does not have severe cognitive impairment (MoCA \> 9)
* Is not severely depressed (PHQ-9 \< 20)
* Does not have more than mild motor speech impairment (ASRS \< 16 and Dysarthria severity \< 3)
* Normal or corrected-to-normal hearing and vision via screening tasks and self-report
* Medically stable
* Not taking any medications that may interfere with prosody processing
* Participation in speech therapy not targeting aprosodia

Exclusion Criteria

* Ischemic stroke outside the right hemisphere or primary hemorrhagic stroke in the right hemisphere
* History of symptomatic stroke or significant neurological disease or injury affecting the brain
* No proficiency in English based on self-report
* Unable to provide informed consent or to indicate another to provide informed consent
* Children \< 18 and adults 90+ years
* No demonstration of expressive or receptive aprosodia
* Severe cognitive-linguistic impairment (MoCA \< 16)
* Severe depression (PHQ-9 \> 19)
* More than mild motor speech impairment (ASRS \> 15 + Dysarthria severity \< 2)
* Uncorrected hearing/vision loss via screening tasks and self-report
* Not medically stable
* Reported medication use that may interfere with prosody processing
* Participating in outside speech therapy targeting aprosodia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Argye E Hillis, MD, MA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00264439

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.