Prediction of Post-stroke Motor Recovery

NCT ID: NCT04574037

Last Updated: 2024-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-21

Study Completion Date

2027-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The prediction of motor recovery in the acute phase of stroke is crucial for several clinical reasons: (i) informing the patient and his relatives, (ii) helping to identify the patient's endorsement (return home or rehabilitation) as well as the adaptation of the rehabilitation program to what can be expected from it. To date, an algorithm (decision tree) proposed by C. Stinear's team named PREP2 is the best predictive tool with 75% of patients well classified at 3 months. It predicts the functional recovery of the upper limb after stroke 3 months before the episode by categorizing recovery as "excellent", "good", "limited" as well as "minor" (poor). With two data (SAFE score, age) or three (SAFE score, Motor evoked potential, NIHSS), the prediction is effective three times out of 4. In the study the team is proposing "PREP-UCV", it would like to validate this algorithm as it is with patients in the active file who are victims of stroke. The expected accuracy is 75% or more. As a secondary objective, the team would like to confirm that it find the same algorithm starting from the initial data from PREP 2 (side of the stroke, type of stroke (ischemic and / or hemorrhagic), involvement of the corticospinal tract on MRI, sex at birth ) as well as two other factors which are also very important: cognitive status (dysexecutive / aphasia / neglect), as well as the neutrophils on lymphocytes ratio.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Retrospective cohort of stroke patients with a upper limb deficit.Clinical scores such as SAFE score, NIHSS; demographic data such as age and electrophysiological data (such as the absence/presence of Motor evoked potential) will determine the predictive functional outcome of the upper limb deficit according to the PREP2 algorithm. The accuracy of this prediction will be verified according to the actual state of the patient at 3-6 months. Second, another algorithm will be built taking in account cognitive deficits and biological data to determine if the accuracy is higher. All data will be acquired during the clinical routine work-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Upper Limb Motor Deficit

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

follow up of stroke patients with a upper limb deficit

Usual follow up of stroke patients with a upper limb deficit

Clinical scores such as SAFE score, NIHSS; demographic data such as age and electrophysiological data (such as the absence/presence of Motor evoked potential)

Intervention Type OTHER

Clinical scores such as SAFE score, NIHSS; demographic data such as age and electrophysiological data (such as the absence/presence of Motor evoked potential) will determine the predictive functional outcome of the upper limb deficit according to the PREP2 algorithm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clinical scores such as SAFE score, NIHSS; demographic data such as age and electrophysiological data (such as the absence/presence of Motor evoked potential)

Clinical scores such as SAFE score, NIHSS; demographic data such as age and electrophysiological data (such as the absence/presence of Motor evoked potential) will determine the predictive functional outcome of the upper limb deficit according to the PREP2 algorithm.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age ≥ 18 y-o,
* admitted in the Pitié-Salpêtrière stroke unit,
* stroke with a upper limb motor deficit,
* agree to participate;

Exclusion Criteria

* contra-indication to MRI or TMS,
* patients under legal guardianship ,
* patients without healthcare insurance
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service des Urgences Cérébro-Vasculaires, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Charlotte ROSSO, MD

Role: CONTACT

1 42 16 21 03 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Charlotte Rosso, MD

Role: primary

01 42 16 21 03/18 54 ext. +33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

APHP 200863

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Post Stroke Motor Learning
NCT01519843 SUSPENDED NA
Fast Arm Motor Skill Training
NCT05013762 COMPLETED NA