Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.

NCT ID: NCT04566497

Last Updated: 2024-06-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2664 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-30

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Due to the lack of randomized controlled trials, the best follow-up strategy of asymptomatic patients after coronary artery revascularization is controversial. A systematic screening of silent myocardial ischemia may help prevent a major acute cardiac event. However, systematic screening strategy is costly and there is currently no evidence that repeated revascularization improve survival. Moreover, stress testing per se or additional procedures which can be performed with regard of stress testing results can cause unexpected complications.

ARCACHON is a national, multicenter, randomized, open label trial, that will evaluate the non-inferiority of a clinical follow-up as compared to a systematic stress testing strategy after coronary revascularization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Coronary artery revascularization is commonly used for the management strategy of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

In the following years after revascularization, the current guidelines recommend evaluation with stress tests when patients are symptomatic. Due to the lack of randomized trials, the evaluation of asymptomatic patients is controversial and accordingly there is a wide variation in routine follow-up strategies in these patients. A systematic screening of silent myocardial ischemia may help prevent a major acute cardiac event. However, systematic screening strategy is costly and there is currently no evidence that repeated revascularization improve survival We hypothesized that clinical follow-up alone would be non-inferior to systematic stress testing screening strategy during follow-up of asymptomatic CAD patients with prior coronary revascularization.

The primary objective of ARCACHON trial is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a strategy of clinical follow-up (without non-invasive stress testing) in asymptomatic patients with a history of coronary revascularization compared to a strategy of systematic screening for myocardial ischemia using non-invasive stress testing by the primary endpoint as the composite of: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke or any cardiovascular event leading to unplanned hospitalization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

no systematic stress testing during follow-up

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

No stress testing

Intervention Type OTHER

No stress testing during the patient follow up (up to 48 months) if the patient remains asymptomatic

Active Comparator

systematic annual stress testing during follow-up

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

stress testing

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Systematic annual stress testing during the patient follow up (up to 48 months)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No stress testing

No stress testing during the patient follow up (up to 48 months) if the patient remains asymptomatic

Intervention Type OTHER

stress testing

Systematic annual stress testing during the patient follow up (up to 48 months)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Arm1 Arm 2

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Prior coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) at any time before randomization.
2. Asymptomatic at the time of randomization (defined as a Canadian Cardiovascular Society score ≤ 1, stable on the current medical treatment).
3. Patient affiliated to Social Security
4. Informed, written consent from the patient

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age \< 18years
2. Any acute coronary syndrome in the previous 3 months
3. Symptoms suggestive of angina pectoris at the time of randomization:

* Angina is characterized by ischemic chest pain occurring on exertion or stress relieved by rest and/or nitroglycerine.
* Angina equivalents are defined as dyspnea, fatigue, or diaphoresis on exertion evaluated by the principal investigator as abnormal and attributable to myocardial ischemia.
4. Any severe valvular disease
5. Prior heart transplantation
6. Class III or IV symptomatic heart failure (NYHA classification).
7. Persons whose occupations impact on public safety (e.g. airline pilots, lorry or bus drivers) in whom systematic stress testing could be required for medico-legal reasons
8. Malignancies and other comorbid conditions with a life expectancy \< 2 years
9. Pregnancy or nursing women
10. Women of childbearing age without effective birth control or intention to become pregnant during the course of the trial
11. Simultaneous enrollment in an interventional clinical trial and interventional research with minimal risks and burden
12. Inability to sign an informed consent. Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship) or mental condition (psychiatric or organ cerebral disease) rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the trial or mental retardation or language barrier such that the patient is unable to give informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nadjib Hammoudi, MD PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

APHP(ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE DES HOPITAUX DE PARIS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pitie salpetriere

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nadjib Hammoudi, MD PHD

Role: CONTACT

01 42 16 55 35 ext. +33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P170908J

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.