Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.
NCT ID: NCT04566497
Last Updated: 2024-06-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
2664 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-30
2025-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
ARCACHON is a national, multicenter, randomized, open label trial, that will evaluate the non-inferiority of a clinical follow-up as compared to a systematic stress testing strategy after coronary revascularization.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Surgery for Patients With Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis
NCT02627391
Early Outcomes of Concomitant Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Management of Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease
NCT04525339
Long-term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patient Undergoing CABG or PCI
NCT03870815
Assessment of Revascularization Versus Conservative Treatment in Heart Transplant Patients for a Clinical Event Reduction
NCT01795729
Prognostic Factors in NOP-LBBB After TAVI
NCT05654792
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the following years after revascularization, the current guidelines recommend evaluation with stress tests when patients are symptomatic. Due to the lack of randomized trials, the evaluation of asymptomatic patients is controversial and accordingly there is a wide variation in routine follow-up strategies in these patients. A systematic screening of silent myocardial ischemia may help prevent a major acute cardiac event. However, systematic screening strategy is costly and there is currently no evidence that repeated revascularization improve survival We hypothesized that clinical follow-up alone would be non-inferior to systematic stress testing screening strategy during follow-up of asymptomatic CAD patients with prior coronary revascularization.
The primary objective of ARCACHON trial is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a strategy of clinical follow-up (without non-invasive stress testing) in asymptomatic patients with a history of coronary revascularization compared to a strategy of systematic screening for myocardial ischemia using non-invasive stress testing by the primary endpoint as the composite of: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke or any cardiovascular event leading to unplanned hospitalization.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental
no systematic stress testing during follow-up
No stress testing
No stress testing during the patient follow up (up to 48 months) if the patient remains asymptomatic
Active Comparator
systematic annual stress testing during follow-up
stress testing
Systematic annual stress testing during the patient follow up (up to 48 months)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No stress testing
No stress testing during the patient follow up (up to 48 months) if the patient remains asymptomatic
stress testing
Systematic annual stress testing during the patient follow up (up to 48 months)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Asymptomatic at the time of randomization (defined as a Canadian Cardiovascular Society score ≤ 1, stable on the current medical treatment).
3. Patient affiliated to Social Security
4. Informed, written consent from the patient
Exclusion Criteria
2. Any acute coronary syndrome in the previous 3 months
3. Symptoms suggestive of angina pectoris at the time of randomization:
* Angina is characterized by ischemic chest pain occurring on exertion or stress relieved by rest and/or nitroglycerine.
* Angina equivalents are defined as dyspnea, fatigue, or diaphoresis on exertion evaluated by the principal investigator as abnormal and attributable to myocardial ischemia.
4. Any severe valvular disease
5. Prior heart transplantation
6. Class III or IV symptomatic heart failure (NYHA classification).
7. Persons whose occupations impact on public safety (e.g. airline pilots, lorry or bus drivers) in whom systematic stress testing could be required for medico-legal reasons
8. Malignancies and other comorbid conditions with a life expectancy \< 2 years
9. Pregnancy or nursing women
10. Women of childbearing age without effective birth control or intention to become pregnant during the course of the trial
11. Simultaneous enrollment in an interventional clinical trial and interventional research with minimal risks and burden
12. Inability to sign an informed consent. Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship) or mental condition (psychiatric or organ cerebral disease) rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the trial or mental retardation or language barrier such that the patient is unable to give informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nadjib Hammoudi, MD PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
APHP(ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE DES HOPITAUX DE PARIS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pitie salpetriere
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P170908J
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.