Coronary Artery Disease in Elderly People Referred for TAVI

NCT ID: NCT04930510

Last Updated: 2021-06-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

170 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-01

Study Completion Date

2023-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators prognostic impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) and of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with indication of TAVI is controversial, particularly in elderly population where CAD and aortic stenosis (AS) are frequent and commonly coexisted. (1-2) The primary end point of this prospective study is to compare major cardiovascular event at one year of follow up in patients over 80 years with severe aortic stenosis who referred for TAVI with or without associated CAD.

The investigators will also assess (secondary endpoint) the impact of PCI on symptoms, major events and quality of life using geriatric parameters. The study will be conducted in the University hospital of Montpellier between November 2020 and November 2022

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients will be prospectively included in the study when aged of 80 years old or over and referred for TAVI at the university hospital of Montpellier.

Two groups of patients will be considered after coronary angiography which is systematic before TAVI Group 1: patients with significant \> 50 % narrowing coronary stenosis ( revascularization by PCI / no revascularization) Group 2: No coronary lesion

Considering an end point at 1 year and a precision wished to i ± 6 percent with an alpha risk of 5 %, it's proposed , by the formula p= \[(1.96)2 x \[p(1-p)\] / i2 \], a number of 170 subjects needed to highlight a incidence of major cardio-vascular event of 20 percent in the studied population.

Data collection by informatic files will include :

* Cardio vascular risk factor and medical history with evaluation of Charlston score
* Previous drug therapy
* Lifestyle : living alone or not, nursing home, ; home help
* Symptoms (angina (CSS classification) ; dyspnea (NHYA classification))
* Renal function (DFG) at admission
* Results of coronary angiography (number of lesions, proximal or non proximal, location of coronary stenosis)
* Geriatric assessment : autonomy, disability in daily living, weigh, BMI, falls, cognitive functions tests, assessment of the mood state by GDS
* Results of TAVI (success and complications of the procedure according to VARC2 criteria)
* Results of coronary revascularization if performed
* Length of hospitalisation for TAVI (days), length of stay in ICU (Intensive Care Unit) if necessary
* Events during the hospitalisation for TAVI (VARC and BARC criterias)

Follow up at 6 month (middle analysis) and at one year (primary end point) by phone conversation with the patient for assessment of :

* Major cardio-vascular events
* Hospitalisation occurred
* Short geriatric evaluation including :

* cognition by Ottawa3DY
* autonomy by ADL
* polypharmacy
* number of fall in the past 6 month
* last weight
* quality of life (Fried criterias)
* mood state by GDS If neurocognitive disorders are known or discovers, data patient's validity will be check by calling his caregiver and/or his general practitioner (if caregiver not available).

Analysis associated of the computerized patient record.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Stenosis Coronary Ang

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 : Elderly 80 years or over patients referred for TAVI with CAD

Elderly 80 years or over patients referred for TAVI with CAD Group 1: Coronary lesion defined as significant (\>50% narrowing) on the coronary angiography performed before TAVI, with or without PCI (decision of the heart team) Description of the coronary lesions included: proximal/non proximal, number of lesions, location of lesion

No interventions assigned to this group

Group 2 : No significant coronary disease group

No significant coronary disease group in the cohort of elderly 80 years or over referred for TAVI

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patient aged 80 and over
* hospital admission for evaluation before TAVI indicated for symptomatic and severe aortic stenosis
* patient's consent

Exclusion Criteria

* absence of coronarography
* severe angina (class 3 or 4)
* stenosis of left main coronary artery \> 50%
* stenosis of the left anterior descending artery \> 90%
* decision of surgical valve replacement
Minimum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Florence Leclercq, PU PH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uhmontpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Florence Leclercq, PU PH

Role: CONTACT

4.67.33.67.33 ext. 33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Florence Leclercq, PUPH

Role: primary

04.67.33.67.33 ext. 33

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cao D, Chiarito M, Pagnotta P, Reimers B, Stefanini GG. Coronary Revascularisation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Candidates: Why, Who, When? Interv Cardiol. 2018 May;13(2):69-76. doi: 10.15420/icr.2018:2:2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29928311 (View on PubMed)

Matta AG, Lhermusier T, Parada FC, Bouisset F, Canitrot R, Nader V, Blanco S, Elbaz M, Roncalli J, Carrie D. Impact of Coronary Artery Disease and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Mar 24;2021:6672400. doi: 10.1155/2021/6672400. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33824628 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL21_0208

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TAVR Without Predilatation
NCT04350658 UNKNOWN