Assessment of Revascularization Versus Conservative Treatment in Heart Transplant Patients for a Clinical Event Reduction

NCT ID: NCT01795729

Last Updated: 2015-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

6 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare optimal medical therapy alone versus percutaneous coronary intervention on top of medical therapy in the setting of heart transplant recipient coronary artery disease in a randomized trial.The primary endpoint assessed at 1 year is the composite of death, myocardial infarction, need for transitory or permanent ventricular assist device implantation, myocardial revascularization, occurrence or worsening of heart failure, any graft dysfunction and/or a decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 25% compared to baseline. The hypothesis of the study is the superiority of the interventional management over medical therapy alone in preventing the occurrence of the primary endpoint of the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The hypothesis of the study is the superiority of the interventional management over medical therapy alone in preventing the occurrence of the primary endpoint of the study assessed 1 year after randomization.

Objectives: To demonstrate the superiority of the interventional management on top of optimal medical therapy over optimal medical therapy alone in preventing the occurrence of the primary endpoint of the study assessed 1 year after randomization

Design : Multicenter, prospective randomized 1 :1, open-label blinded endpoint study

Target population : Heart transplant recipients, aged ≥18 years, without coronary artery disease-related symptoms, with angiographically significant coronary artery stenoses (≥50% anatomically adequate for a revascularization by coronary angioplasty with stent implantation, with no contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy associating aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitorfor a duration of 12 monthsand with ni grade IA ACC/AHA indication for revascularization

Inclusion period: 12 months (may be extended based on the inclusion rythme)

Maximum duration of participation for patients : 13 months

Total duration of the study : 37 months

Primary endpoint : The composit of death, myocardial infarction, retransplantation, implantation of transitory or definitve ventricular assist devices, new or worsening heart failure, graft failure and/or a decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 25% compared to baseline.The occurrence of any event qualifying for the primary endpoint will be assessed by a Cox survival analysis stratified on center.The primary endpoint will be assessed 12 months after randomization.

Secondary endpoints : Any of the individual events defining the primary outcome at 1 year

Number of patients to be included and power calculation : 80 patients per group. A 1 year primary endpoint rate of 30% in the active and 50% in with an inclusion period of 24 months and alpha=5% warants a 90% power using a cox model.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart-lung Transplant Rejection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1: Coronary stent+optimal medical therapy

Coronary stent on top of optimal medical therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Coronary revascularization

optimal medical therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Dual antiplatelet therapy: aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor as indicated

2: Optimal medical therapy

Optimal medical therapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

optimal medical therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Dual antiplatelet therapy: aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor as indicated

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stent

Coronary revascularization

Intervention Type DEVICE

optimal medical therapy

Dual antiplatelet therapy: aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor as indicated

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Any type of approved bare metal or drug-eluting coronary stent Any treatment required at the physicians discretion for the treatment of the patient

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients ≥ 18 years old
* Heart transplant recipient
* Stable clinical situation
* One or several non-critical coronary stenoses (≥ 50% et ≤ 75% visually or QCA-assessed diameter stenosis) considered as adequate for coronary stenting by the operator
* Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40%
* Informed consentement signed by the patient

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute coronary syndrome
* In-stent restenosis
* Proof of an extensive myocardial ischemia (≥ 7/17 segments ASE model)
* Coronary stenosis considered as critical by the operators with slow flow
* ACC/AHA Class IA indication for revascularization :

* vessel disease with left ventricular dysfunction
* Left main stenosis
* Severe proximal LAD stenosis
* Contra-indication to dual antiplatelet therapy
* Decompensated heart failure at the time of randomization
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women- Patients participating to another clinical research within 30 days before randomization- life expectancy \< 1 y
* Patients unable to observe strict medical therapy and follow-up within 1 year after randomization
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Farzin BEYGUI, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Pascal LEPRINCE, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Saida VARNOUS, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pitié Salpetriere university Hospital - Cardiology

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-A01516-33

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P081262

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.