Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Rib Fractures
NCT ID: NCT04558281
Last Updated: 2023-06-12
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
4 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-23
2023-03-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
One recent study found that the ability to move air into and out of the lungs practically doubled with the administration of a single-injection Erector Spainae Plane Block (ESPB) while pain levels nearly halved. However, a single-injection nerve block lasts less than 24 hours while a perineural local anesthetic infusion (also termed a "continuous peripheral nerve block") may be administered for multiple days. This entails inserting a tiny tube through the skin and into the area around the nerves, after which more local anesthetic may be administered prolonging the numbing effects.
The possibility of extending the duration of a ESPB with local anesthetic administration via a perineural catheter has not be investigated. We therefore are conducting a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm study to investigate the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB following traumatic rib fractures.
The primary outcome of this study will be the maximum inspired volume measured by incentive spirometry on the afternoon following the nerve block procedure. We hypothesize that the maximum inspired volume will be significantly increased in the afternoon following the procedure with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Analgesic Techniques for Rib Fractures
NCT06519929
PVB vs Ketamine/Lidocaine in Rib Fracture Patients
NCT04413799
Continuous Intercostal Nerve Blockade for Traumatic Rib Fractures
NCT02604589
Lidocaine Infusions for Rib Fractures
NCT03571919
Serratus Plain Block Versus Paravertebral Block Versus Serratus Plain Block and Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Pain Following Thoracoscopic Surgery
NCT04222010
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a nerve block that covers multiple rib fractures with a single injection. This block entails injecting local anesthetic in the back superficial to the vertebral bodies. One study found that the ability to move air into and out of the lungs practically doubled with the administration of a single-injection ESPB while pain levels nearly halved.
A single-injection nerve block lasts less than 24 hours while a perineural local anesthetic infusion (also termed a "continuous peripheral nerve block") may be administered for multiple days. This entails inserting a tiny tube through the skin and into the area around the nerves, after which more local anesthetic may be administered prolonging the numbing effects. The possibility of extending the duration of a ESPB with local anesthetic administration via a perineural catheter has not be investigated.
We therefore are conducting a randomized, tripe-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm study to investigate the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB following traumatic rib fracture. Subjects will be individuals who present with rib fracture(s) and significant pain. Those who consent to participate in this study will have an ESP catheter inserted using ultrasound-guidance on the ipsilateral side at the level of the inferior-most fracture. For bilateral fractures, a second catheter will also be inserted on the remaining side. The single-injection ESPB will be administered to each catheter with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% (with epinephrine).
Subjects with an accurately-inserted catheter based on visualization of local anesthetic spread will be allocated to one of two possible perineural treatments stratified by unilateral vs. bilateral fractures (1:1 ratio in blocks of 2):
1. active (ropivacaine 0.3%)
2. placebo (normal saline)
Computer-generated randomization lists will be created by the UCSD Investigational Drug Service which will keep the randomization lists and not release them to the investigators until the study is completed, at which time they will provide lists of subjects who received "Treatment A" and "Treatment B" so that the statistician can analyze the data. Only after the analysis is complete will "Treatment A" and "Treatment B" be defined for the investigators for manuscript preparation \[producing a triple-masked study\]. Of note, for bilateral catheters the treatments on both sides will always be identical: each subject will be randomized to a single treatment and not each side of bilateral cases.
Subjects will receive a basal infusion of study fluid (ropivacaine vs. placebo) 1 mL/h to keep the catheter lumen patent as soon as the infusion pump is initiated with a 500 mL reservoir. In addition, intermittent boluses (13 mL programmed automatic bolus every 2 hours) will begin 5 hours after pump initiation. For bilateral catheters, a 6-hour delay for one of the pumps will ensure that the pair of pumps alternate sides for the bolus doses each hour. This protocol will provide nearly 71-72 hours of study fluid administration.
Following local anesthetic reservoir exhaustion, subjects or their caretakers will remove the catheters with instructions provided by phone. This is standard at UC San Diego for all ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks and will not be unique to study participation. The catheter is disposable in the trash and the infusion pump will be returned using a pre-addressed and postage-paid envelope provided to subjects prior to leaving the hospital.
Subjects will be contacted by telephone to collect study data on post procedure days 1, 2, 7, and at months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, and 12.
The ultimate objective of the proposed line of research is to determine if the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB prolongs analgesia following traumatic rib fractures; and, if this analgesic intervention improves pulmonary mechanics measured with incentive spirometry.
Specific Aim 1: To determine if the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB improves maximum inspiratory volume following traumatic rib fracture(s).
Hypothesis 1a: The maximum inspired volume will be significantly increased in the afternoon following the procedure \[primary endpoint\] as well as at other time points following the procedure \[secondary end points\] with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB \[measured with an incentive spirometer\].
Hypothesis 1b: The maximum inspired volume as a percentage of the baseline will be significantly increased in the afternoon following the procedure \[secondary endpoint of greatest interest\], as well as at other time points following the procedure \[secondary end points\] with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB \[measured with an incentive spirometer\].
Specific Aim 2: To determine if the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB decreases the pain associated with rib fracture(s).
Hypothesis 2a: The severity of rib fracture pain at rest will be significantly decreased within the 12 months following the procedure with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB \[measured using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain\].
Hypothesis 2b: The severity of rib fracture pain when using the spirometer or coughing will be significantly decreased within the 12 months following the procedure with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB \[measured using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain\].
Hypothesis 2c: The incidence of chronic rib fracture pain will be significantly decreased 6 and 12 months following a rib fracture with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB \[measured using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain\].
Hypothesis 2d: The severity of chronic rib fracture pain will be significantly decreased 6 and 12 months following a rib fracture with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB \[measured using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain\].
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active Treatment
This group will receive a single injection nerve block of ropivacaine 0.5% (20 mL) followed by an infusion/boluses of ropivacaine 0.3% (continuous block)
Active ropivacaine 0.3% erector spinae plane perineural administration
Ropivacaine 0.3% administration via an erector spinae plane perineural catheter
Placebo
This group will receive a single injection nerve block of ropivacaine 0.5% (20 mL) followed by an infusion/boluses of normal saline
Placebo erector spinae plane perineural administration
Normal saline administration via an erector spinae plane perineural catheter
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active ropivacaine 0.3% erector spinae plane perineural administration
Ropivacaine 0.3% administration via an erector spinae plane perineural catheter
Placebo erector spinae plane perineural administration
Normal saline administration via an erector spinae plane perineural catheter
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* regional anesthetic requested by the admitting service
* patient accepting of a perineural catheter insertion and subsequent study fluid treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy
* incarceration
* inability to communicate with the investigators
* weight \< 45 kg or morbid obesity (body mass index \> 40 kg/m2)
* comorbidity precluding either perineural catheter insertion or subsequent ambulatory perineural local anesthetic administration (e.g., current infection at the catheter insertion site, known hepatic or renal insufficiency, immune-compromised status of any etiology)
* any patient unable to correctly perform incentive spirometry as this is the primary outcome measure
* any patient with any degree of decreased mental capacity as determined by the surgical service
* any reason an investigator believes study participation would not be in the best interest of the potential subject
* flail chest
* chest tube
* fracture of the 1st rib on either side
* any injury other than the rib fracture(s) that potentially effects inspiratory effort or volume (e.g., clavicle fracture)
* inability to contact the investigators during the perineural administration, and vice versa (e.g., lack of telephone access).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS
Professor in Residence
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John J Finneran IV, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of California, San Diego
Brian M Ilfeld, MD, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Diego
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University California San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
cESPB for Rib Fractures
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.