Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Multiple Traumatic Fracture Ribs

NCT ID: NCT03595397

Last Updated: 2018-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-31

Study Completion Date

2019-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This work aims at comparing the analgesic effect of Thoracic Epidural Magnesium sulfate versus Fentanyl when added as adjuvants to Bupivacaine in patients with multiple traumatic fracture ribs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rib fractures are a common condition following trauma with a reported incidence of up to 10% in trauma in general, and up to 39% in blunt chest trauma. Traumatic rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and mortality rates reaching 10-16% has been reported. An estimated one third of patients with traumatic rib fractures develop secondary pulmonary complications with an associated mortality rate as high as 65% . Pain is recognized as a contributing factor to adverse outcome in traumatic rib fractures due to pain-induced inadequate respiratory efforts leading to atelectasis, difficulties in clearing secretions and an increased risk of developing pneumonia. Consequently, adequate analgesia is considered a core intervention in the management of patients with traumatic rib fractures.

There are a variety of ways to manage a patient's pain. Oral analgesic drugs and regional modes are more likely to be used .

Regional analgesia is often supplemented with a small dose of either NSAIDs or opioids and pain reduction is typically strong and immediate. There is little sedation, so evaluation of head and abdominal injuries is easier. A major disadvantage is the technical complexity of the procedures, leading to occasional errors in the administering of the treatments. They can also be painful while the needle is entering (or catheter is being installed), toxicity is a possibility, and the patients require more intensive monitoring and care by the physicians and nurses. There are a variety of modes; the four most common are TEA, thoracic paravertebral block, intercostal block, and intrapleural block. This study focuses on thoracic epidural analgesia.

Narcotic infusions and continuous local anesthetic can be delivered through thoracic or lumbar epidural catheters. Opioid receptors exist in the spinal cord that can alter the perception of pain without needing stimulation of receptors in the brain. After inserting the catheter into this area, local anesthetics and narcotics are administered, blocking the anterior and posterior nerve roots crossing this space. The anesthetic/analgesic agents diffuse across the dura and begin to block sensory nerves. Motor nerves are affected to a lesser degree. It takes a large dose to achieve the desired effect.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia, Fracture Ribs

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I

20 patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia with a loading dose of 8 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine, followed by continuous infusion of 8 ml/hour

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

20 patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia with a loading dose of 8 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine, followed by continuous infusion of 8 ml/hour

Thoracic epidural

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia

Group II

20 patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia with a loading dose of 8 ml mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and 30 mg/kg magnesium sulfate, followed by continuous infusion of 8 ml/hour of a mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and 20% magnesium sulfate

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Magnesium Sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

20 patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia with a loading dose of 8 ml mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and 30 mg/kg Magnesium Sulfate, followed by continuous infusion of 8 ml/hour mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and 20% Magnesium sulfate

Thoracic epidural

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia

Group III

20 patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia with a loading dose of 8 ml of 0.125 bupivacaine and 2 mcg/ml fentanyl, followed by continuous infusion of 8 ml/hour

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

20 patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia with a loading dose of 8 ml of 0.125 bupivacaine and 2 mcg/ml fentanyl, followed by continuous infusion of 8 ml/hour.

Thoracic epidural

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine

20 patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia with a loading dose of 8 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine, followed by continuous infusion of 8 ml/hour

Intervention Type DRUG

Magnesium Sulfate

20 patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia with a loading dose of 8 ml mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and 30 mg/kg Magnesium Sulfate, followed by continuous infusion of 8 ml/hour mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and 20% Magnesium sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Fentanyl

20 patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia with a loading dose of 8 ml of 0.125 bupivacaine and 2 mcg/ml fentanyl, followed by continuous infusion of 8 ml/hour.

Intervention Type DRUG

Thoracic epidural

All patients will receive mid-thoracic epidural analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

bupivacaine bupivacaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients 16 years of age and greater
2. Non-intubated at the time of block placement
3. Traumatic Rib Fractures two or greater
4. Block must be done within 12-24 hours of presentation to the emergency room
5. ASA physical status: I-II

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient refusal
2. BMI more than 30 kg/m2
3. Need for mechanical ventilation on admission
4. Hemodynamic instability
5. Haemothorax or Pneumothorax
6. Contraindications of performing blocks as coagulopathy, vertebral column deformities, local infection
7. Traumatic head injury
8. Allergy to local anesthetic agents
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed khalid Fathy

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed K Fathy, resident

Role: CONTACT

00201117012741

Emad Z Kamel, Lecturer

Role: CONTACT

00201007046058

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gage A, Rivara F, Wang J, Jurkovich GJ, Arbabi S. The effect of epidural placement in patients after blunt thoracic trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):39-45; discussion 45-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab1b08.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24368355 (View on PubMed)

Dehghan N, de Mestral C, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH, Nathens A. Flail chest injuries: a review of outcomes and treatment practices from the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):462-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000086.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24458051 (View on PubMed)

Flagel BT, Luchette FA, Reed RL, Esposito TJ, Davis KA, Santaniello JM, Gamelli RL. Half-a-dozen ribs: the breakpoint for mortality. Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):717-23; discussion 723-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16269301 (View on PubMed)

Ziegler DW, Agarwal NN. The morbidity and mortality of rib fractures. J Trauma. 1994 Dec;37(6):975-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199412000-00018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7996614 (View on PubMed)

Wu CL, Jani ND, Perkins FM, Barquist E. Thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for the treatment of rib fracture pain after motor vehicle crash. J Trauma. 1999 Sep;47(3):564-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199909000-00025.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10498316 (View on PubMed)

Mackersie RC, Karagianes TG, Hoyt DB, Davis JW. Prospective evaluation of epidural and intravenous administration of fentanyl for pain control and restoration of ventilatory function following multiple rib fractures. J Trauma. 1991 Apr;31(4):443-9; discussion 449-51.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1902264 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Thoracic Epidural analgesia

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lidocaine Infusions for Rib Fractures
NCT03571919 WITHDRAWN PHASE4
PVB vs Ketamine/Lidocaine in Rib Fracture Patients
NCT04413799 TERMINATED EARLY_PHASE1
Epidural Neostigmine for Labor Pain
NCT00779467 COMPLETED PHASE1
Paravertebral Calcitonin in Thoracotomy
NCT06330168 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA