Trial of Injected Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Infusion After Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures

NCT ID: NCT03305666

Last Updated: 2021-09-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-05

Study Completion Date

2021-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rib fractures represent a common injury pattern this is highly associated with patient morbidity and mortality, as pain control remains a challenge. Even after surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF), unsuccessful pain control can lead to morbid outcomes such as pneumonia and opioid dependence. Multi-modal anesthesia, with the use of thoracic epidurals and para-vertebral injections/catheters, has shown to lessen these occurrences but are subject to a wide array of limitations. A more directed therapy with liposomal bupivacaine has shown to provide sustained analgesia for up to 72 hours in patients who have undergone other types of thoracic surgery, but not SSRF. The hypothesis of the current clinical trial is that, among patients undergoing SSRF, liposomal bupivacaine delivered via video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is an intercostal nerve block that provides comparable analgesia to the pain catheter, as measured by pulmonary function, numeric pain scoring, and postoperative narcotic use.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rib fractures represent a common injury pattern with high associated morbidity and mortality. Effective pain control in both the acute and long term periods remains a challenge. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is now a recommended treatment for patients with severe chest wall injuries. In addition to stabilization of the chest wall, SSRF offers a unique opportunity to deliver directed, loco-regional anesthesia. Loco-regional anesthesia is a recognized, essential component of multi-modal anesthesia for patients with rib fractures in order to both decrease pain and minimize the use of opioids and their associated side effects.

Delivery options for loco-regional anesthesia to patients with rib fractures share in common the intention of anesthetizing the intercostal nerves. Moving from the spinal cord laterally, modalities include thoracic epidural catheters, paravertebral blocks or catheters, and rib/intercostal blocks. Although rib blocks may be accomplished via a variety of techniques, the two most common intra-operative techniques are video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) intercostal nerve blocks and indwelling, subscapular catheters In general, neuraxial modalities such as thoracic epidural and para-vertebral injections/catheters are subject to a wide array of limitations, including patient coagulopathy (International Normalized Ratio \> 1.5), co-existing spine fractures, peri-insertion, peri-removal withholding of venous thromboembolism pharmacoprophylaxis, and provider availability. For these reasons, our current practice is to insert a subscapular "pain catheter" at the conclusion of the SSRF operation; this catheter is able to deliver a continuous infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine and may be left in place for several days.

Although favorable results using the pain catheter have been published in patients with rib fractures who have not undergone SSRF, we have noticed several limitations to this treatment modality. First, position is highly variable; and, because the catheter is not truly in the space of the intercostal nerves, drug delivery is likely irregular. This variability may be particularly relevant in obese patients; and the median body mass index of patient who underwent SSRF at Denver Health is 29 kg/m\^2. Beyond catheter placement, we have also experienced issues with leakage of drug from the skin entry site of the catheter. Moreover, catheters frequently become dislodged or inadvertently removed during patient transport. Further, the indwelling foreign body likely introduces some risk of infection. Finally, the presence of the catheter is distressing to many patients.

Liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, www.pacira.com) has been shown to provide sustained analgesia for up to 72 hours following a single injection of the drug delivery system. The safety and efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine has been evaluated in over 1,300 subjects and 21 clinical trials. Although many of these trials have included thoracic surgery patients, no trial has evaluated the efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine administered to patients with rib fractures undergoing SSRF. Potential benefits as compared to current practice include directed injection immediately adjacent to the intercostal nerve using a VATS approach, as well as obviation of the need for an indwelling catheter. The hypothesis of the current clinical trial is that, among patients undergoing SSRF, liposomal bupivacaine delivered via video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is an intercostal nerve block that provides comparable analgesia to the pain catheter, as measured by pulmonary function, numeric pain scoring, and postoperative narcotic use.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Drug Effect Rib Fractures Rib Trauma Surgical Procedure, Unspecified Pain; Catheter (Other) Nerve Pain Local Infiltration Anesthesia, Local Intercostal Rib Opioid Dependence Chest Injury Trauma Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Non-inferiority, randomized, clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacaine indwelling catheter

Bupivacaine indwelling OnQ pain pump catheter will be placed in the subscapular space at the time of surgery, at infusion of 12 ml/hr of 0.25% bupivacaine, and left in place for a maximum of 120 hours

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine indwelling catheter

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine indwelling OnQ pain pump catheter is placed in the subscapular space at the time of SSRF for continuous bupivacaine infusion post op

Liposomal bupivacaine injection

A single injection of liposomal bupivacaine: mixture of 20 mL liposomal bupivacaine, 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, and 10 mL sterile saline (50 mL total), will be delivered in the intercostal space during VATS (with a 178 mm, 22 gauge needle, at ribs 3-8).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Liposomal bupivacaine injection

Intervention Type DRUG

A single injection of liposomal bupivacaine is administered at the time of SSRF, directly to the fracture site via VATS

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Liposomal bupivacaine injection

A single injection of liposomal bupivacaine is administered at the time of SSRF, directly to the fracture site via VATS

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine indwelling catheter

Bupivacaine indwelling OnQ pain pump catheter is placed in the subscapular space at the time of SSRF for continuous bupivacaine infusion post op

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Exparel OnQ pain pump, Continuous infusion of bupivacaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing SSRF at Denver Health Medical Center

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine
* Pregnancy
* Incarceration
* Age \< 18 years
* Indwelling continuous thoracic epidural analgesia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Denver Health and Hospital Authority

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fredric Pieracci, MD MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Denver Health and Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Denver Health

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leasia KN, Ciarallo C, Prins JTH, Preslaski C, Perkins-Pride E, Hardin K, Cralley A, Burlew CC, Coleman JJ, Cohen MJ, Lawless R, Platnick KB, Moore EE, Pieracci FM. A randomized clinical trial of single dose liposomal bupivacaine versus indwelling analgesic catheter in patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Nov 1;91(5):872-878. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003264.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33951024 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-0685

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ketamine vs Lidocaine in Traumatic Rib Fractures
NCT04781673 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4
Analgesic Effect of Liposomal Bupivacaine
NCT05118399 COMPLETED PHASE4