Lenient Rate Control Versus Strict Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation. The Danish Atrial Fibrillation Randomised Clinical Trial
NCT ID: NCT04542785
Last Updated: 2022-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
350 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-03-31
2026-03-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators will therefore undertake a randomised, superiority trial at four hospitals in Denmark.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Withdrawal of Treatment for Heart Failure Patients With Recovery From Tachycardia-induced Cardiomyopathy
NCT06128980
A Retrospective Register Study to Map the Frequency of Short Duration Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among All Patients Admitted to Roskilde Sygehus in Denmark in 2010
NCT01502176
Danish Evaluation of Early Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT06560047
Low Dose of Diltiazem for Rate Control of Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00834925
Atrial Fibrillation and Premature Atrial Complexes in Patients With Ischemic Stroke.
NCT02180542
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lenient rate control
Treating physicians will target a resting heart rate between 80 and 110 beats per minute on a 12-lead resting ECG measured over 1 minute after 5 minutes of rest.
Rate control
Treatment will be provided according to current guidelines and as such the algorithm for treatment will be differentiated based on the status of left ventricular ejection fraction. For participants with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) will be the primary therapy. Secondary therapies may include digoxin or amiodarone. For participants with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, the primary therapy will be beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) or non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (verapamil) with secondary therapy consisting of digoxin or amiodarone. Pacing therapies, alone or with atrioventricular node ablation, are utilised as indicated in the view of the treating physician.
Strict rate control
Treating physicians will target a resting heart rate a mean resting heart rate \< 80 bpm on a 12-lead resting ECG measured over 1 minute after 5 minutes of rest.
Rate control
Treatment will be provided according to current guidelines and as such the algorithm for treatment will be differentiated based on the status of left ventricular ejection fraction. For participants with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) will be the primary therapy. Secondary therapies may include digoxin or amiodarone. For participants with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, the primary therapy will be beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) or non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (verapamil) with secondary therapy consisting of digoxin or amiodarone. Pacing therapies, alone or with atrioventricular node ablation, are utilised as indicated in the view of the treating physician.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rate control
Treatment will be provided according to current guidelines and as such the algorithm for treatment will be differentiated based on the status of left ventricular ejection fraction. For participants with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) will be the primary therapy. Secondary therapies may include digoxin or amiodarone. For participants with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, the primary therapy will be beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) or non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (verapamil) with secondary therapy consisting of digoxin or amiodarone. Pacing therapies, alone or with atrioventricular node ablation, are utilised as indicated in the view of the treating physician.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Rate control must be accepted as being the primary management strategy going forward. Consideration towards whether rhythm control is more appropriate must be considered, especially given the results of the Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial (EAST).
3. Informed consent.
4. Adult (18 years or older).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Initial heart rate under 80 bpm at rest (assessed via ECG before randomisation).
3. Less than 3 weeks of anticoagulation with new oral anticoagulants or 4 weeks with efficient warfarin if indicated.
4. If the treating physician deems that the participant is not fit to be randomised into both groups based on an individual assessment. Such a decision will be made before randomisation by the treating physician. This can e.g. be participants dependent on a high ventricular rate to maintain a sufficient cardiac output. Such participants could be participants with heart failure, participants with a hemodynamically significant valve dysfunction, or severely dehydrated participants.
5. Participants who are haemodynamically unstable and therefore require immediate electrical cardioversion
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Odense University Hospital
OTHER
Hvidovre University Hospital
OTHER
Zealand University Hospital
OTHER
Holbaek Sygehus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joshua Rose-Hansen Feinberg
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joshua Feinberg, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Holbaek University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Holbæk Hospital
Holbæk, , Denmark
Hvidovre University Hospital
Hvidovre, , Denmark
Odense University Hospital
Odense, , Denmark
Zealand University Hospital - Roskilde
Roskilde, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Joshua B Feinberg, MD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cold IM, Feinberg JB, Brandes A, Davidsen U, Dixen U, Dominguez H, Gang UJO, Gluud C, Hadad R, Kristensen KE, van Le DT, Nielsen EE, Olsen MH, Pedersen OD, Raymond IE, Sajadieh A, Soja AMB, Jakobsen JC. Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a statistical analysis plan for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2023 Apr 1;24(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07247-7.
Feinberg JB, Olsen MH, Brandes A, Raymond L, Nielsen WB, Nielsen EE, Stensgaard-Hansen F, Dixen U, Pedersen OD, Gang UJO, Gluud C, Jakobsen JC. Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 31;11(3):e044744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044744.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REG-078-2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.