Lenient Rate Control Versus Strict Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation. The Danish Atrial Fibrillation Randomised Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT04542785

Last Updated: 2022-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

350 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-31

Study Completion Date

2026-03-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart arrhythmia with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the western world. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of death and morbidity. The comparable effects of a lenient rate control strategy and a strict rate control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation are uncertain and only one trial has assessed this previously in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation.

The investigators will therefore undertake a randomised, superiority trial at four hospitals in Denmark.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Chronic Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Outcome assessors will be blinded. Participants will not be informed of the heart rate target or actual heart rate. Treatment providers managing the heart rate target will not be blinded as the intervention requires information of the heart rate. Other treatment providers will not be informed of the heart rate target.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lenient rate control

Treating physicians will target a resting heart rate between 80 and 110 beats per minute on a 12-lead resting ECG measured over 1 minute after 5 minutes of rest.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rate control

Intervention Type OTHER

Treatment will be provided according to current guidelines and as such the algorithm for treatment will be differentiated based on the status of left ventricular ejection fraction. For participants with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) will be the primary therapy. Secondary therapies may include digoxin or amiodarone. For participants with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, the primary therapy will be beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) or non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (verapamil) with secondary therapy consisting of digoxin or amiodarone. Pacing therapies, alone or with atrioventricular node ablation, are utilised as indicated in the view of the treating physician.

Strict rate control

Treating physicians will target a resting heart rate a mean resting heart rate \< 80 bpm on a 12-lead resting ECG measured over 1 minute after 5 minutes of rest.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rate control

Intervention Type OTHER

Treatment will be provided according to current guidelines and as such the algorithm for treatment will be differentiated based on the status of left ventricular ejection fraction. For participants with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) will be the primary therapy. Secondary therapies may include digoxin or amiodarone. For participants with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, the primary therapy will be beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) or non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (verapamil) with secondary therapy consisting of digoxin or amiodarone. Pacing therapies, alone or with atrioventricular node ablation, are utilised as indicated in the view of the treating physician.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rate control

Treatment will be provided according to current guidelines and as such the algorithm for treatment will be differentiated based on the status of left ventricular ejection fraction. For participants with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) will be the primary therapy. Secondary therapies may include digoxin or amiodarone. For participants with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, the primary therapy will be beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) or non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (verapamil) with secondary therapy consisting of digoxin or amiodarone. Pacing therapies, alone or with atrioventricular node ablation, are utilised as indicated in the view of the treating physician.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Participants with atrial fibrillation (ECG confirmed and diagnosed by the treatment provider) who at inclusion have either persistent (defined as atrial fibrillation for more than 7days) or permanent atrial fibrillation (only rate control is considered going forward).
2. Rate control must be accepted as being the primary management strategy going forward. Consideration towards whether rhythm control is more appropriate must be considered, especially given the results of the Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial (EAST).
3. Informed consent.
4. Adult (18 years or older).

Exclusion Criteria

1. No informed consent.
2. Initial heart rate under 80 bpm at rest (assessed via ECG before randomisation).
3. Less than 3 weeks of anticoagulation with new oral anticoagulants or 4 weeks with efficient warfarin if indicated.
4. If the treating physician deems that the participant is not fit to be randomised into both groups based on an individual assessment. Such a decision will be made before randomisation by the treating physician. This can e.g. be participants dependent on a high ventricular rate to maintain a sufficient cardiac output. Such participants could be participants with heart failure, participants with a hemodynamically significant valve dysfunction, or severely dehydrated participants.
5. Participants who are haemodynamically unstable and therefore require immediate electrical cardioversion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Odense University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hvidovre University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zealand University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Holbaek Sygehus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joshua Rose-Hansen Feinberg

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joshua Feinberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Holbaek University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Holbæk Hospital

Holbæk, , Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Hvidovre University Hospital

Hvidovre, , Denmark

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Odense University Hospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Zealand University Hospital - Roskilde

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Joshua Feinberg, MD

Role: CONTACT

+45 59484530

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Joshua B Feinberg, MD

Role: primary

004550587215

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cold IM, Feinberg JB, Brandes A, Davidsen U, Dixen U, Dominguez H, Gang UJO, Gluud C, Hadad R, Kristensen KE, van Le DT, Nielsen EE, Olsen MH, Pedersen OD, Raymond IE, Sajadieh A, Soja AMB, Jakobsen JC. Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a statistical analysis plan for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2023 Apr 1;24(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07247-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37005636 (View on PubMed)

Feinberg JB, Olsen MH, Brandes A, Raymond L, Nielsen WB, Nielsen EE, Stensgaard-Hansen F, Dixen U, Pedersen OD, Gang UJO, Gluud C, Jakobsen JC. Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 31;11(3):e044744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044744.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33789853 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REG-078-2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.