Rate Control Therapy Evaluation in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF)
NCT ID: NCT02391337
Last Updated: 2021-06-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
161 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-20
2019-09-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The research will be focused around a randomised trial of two medication strategies, providing much-needed data on the comparison of digoxin and beta-blockers (two commonly-used drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation). It will also allow us to identify the best way to record patient-reported quality of life and develop robust techniques to determine heart function using non-invasive imaging, facilitating the conduct of a large-scale clinical trial. The key objectives of the research programme are to define the optimal medications for patients with atrial fibrillation and identify the most valid, reproducible and cost-effective methods to examine patients. The ultimate aim of the project is to improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation, benefiting patients, the National Health Service and the global community.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
APAF: Assessment of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00111527
Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT00878384
Treatment Of Atrial Fibrillation In Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure
NCT04160000
Efficacy of Different Ablation Strategies for Controlling Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00379301
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Compared to Rate Control Strategy in Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function
NCT02509754
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The RAte control Therapy Evaluation in permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) trial is informed by a number of in-depth systematic reviews of management and clinical outcomes in AF patients. Taken together, this information provides a sound basis to plan a major randomised controlled trial (RCT). However as trials of rate-control in AF have typically been small or uncontrolled, further information is needed before designing a trial that can assess clinical outcomes. The RATE-AF trial will allow us to define appropriate primary and secondary outcome measures and their standard deviation in a contemporary population of patients with permanent AF. This information will allow us to estimate sample size, determination of recruitment, retention and adherence policies, and to ascertain the best methods of obtaining adverse event data and reliable economic costs for a larger trial assessing cardiovascular outcomes and hospitalization. The RATE-AF trial will also be the largest RCT of its kind, allowing us to compare the effect of beta-blockers and digoxin on QoL as initial rate-control therapy in patients with permanent AF. The long-term aim of the research is to answer key questions about how to initiate therapy, stratified by relevant patient characteristics such as systolic and diastolic cardiac function, baseline symptoms and concurrent medication. The research will also define the patho-physiological mechanisms underlying AF-related symptoms, left-ventricular function and their association with adverse clinical outcomes, and to identify clinical markers for the response to different rate control therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Beta-blocker
In Group B, oral bisoprolol will be commenced at either 1.25mg, 2.5mg or 5mg according to the treatment schedule and uptitrated, as required, to 15mg daily. Recommended additional therapy in this arm includes diltiazem. Use of digoxin is explicitly discouraged but will not terminate participation in the study. If intolerance to bisoprolol occurs, investigators will be advised to try an alternate beta-blocker of their choosing (typically carvedilol, nebivolol, or metoprolol) at equivalent dosage.
Bisoprolol
Drug intervention
Digoxin
In Group A, the maintenance dose of oral digoxin will be either 62.5mcg or 125mcg according to the pre-defined treatment schedule and uptitrated, as required, to 250mcg daily. A single loading dose of four tablets (250 or 500mcg according to target maintenance dose) will be prescribed in digoxin-naïve participants, where necessary. Recommended additional therapy in this arm includes the calcium-channel blocker diltiazem. Use of beta-blockers is explicitly discouraged but will not terminate participation in the study.
Digoxin
Drug intervention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bisoprolol
Drug intervention
Digoxin
Drug intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Permanent AF, characterised (at time of randomisation) as a physician decision for rate-control with no plans for cardioversion, anti-arrhythmic medication, or ablation therapy
3. Symptoms of breathlessness (New York Heart Association Class II or more)
4. Able to provide written, informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Known contraindications for therapy with beta-blockers or digoxin, e.g. a history of severe bronchospasm that would preclude use of beta-blockers, or known intolerance to these medications
3. Baseline heart rate \<60 bpm
4. Known intolerance of beta-blockers or digoxin
5. A history of severe bronchospasm (e.g. due to asthma) that would preclude use of beta-blockers
6. Baseline heart rate \<60 bpm
7. History of second or third-degree heart block
8. Supraventricular arrhythmias associated with accessory conducting pathways (e.g. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) or a history of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation
9. Planned pacemaker implantation, pacemaker-dependent rhythm or history of atrioventricular node ablation
10. Decompensated heart failure (evidenced by need for intravenous inotropes, vasodilators or diuretics) within 14 days prior to randomisation
11. A current diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis or constrictive pericarditis
12. Received or on waiting list for heart transplantation
13. Initiation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (with/without defibrillator) within 6 months prior to randomisation
14. Intravenous infusions for heart failure (inotropes, vasodilators or diuretics) within 7 days prior to randomisation
15. A current diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis or constrictive pericarditis
16. Received or on waiting list for heart transplantation
17. Receiving renal replacement therapy
18. Major surgery, including thoracic or cardiac surgery, within 3 months of randomisation
19. Severe, concomitant non-cardiovascular disease (including malignancy) that is expected to reduce life expectancy
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dipak Kotecha, MBChB PhD MRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Birmingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
City Hospital
Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kotecha D, Holmes J, Krum H, Altman DG, Manzano L, Cleland JG, Lip GY, Coats AJ, Andersson B, Kirchhof P, von Lueder TG, Wedel H, Rosano G, Shibata MC, Rigby A, Flather MD; Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure Collaborative Group. Efficacy of beta blockers in patients with heart failure plus atrial fibrillation: an individual-patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014 Dec 20;384(9961):2235-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61373-8. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
Abdali Z, Bunting KV, Mehta S, Camm J, Rahimi K, Stanbury M, Haynes S, Kotecha D, Jowett S. Cost-effectiveness of digoxin versus beta blockers in permanent atrial fibrillation: the Rate Control Therapy Evaluation in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) randomised trial. Heart. 2025 Mar 26;111(8):362-369. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324761.
Gill SK, Barsky A, Guan X, Bunting KV, Karwath A, Tica O, Stanbury M, Haynes S, Folarin A, Dobson R, Kurps J, Asselbergs FW, Grobbee DE, Camm AJ, Eijkemans MJC, Gkoutos GV, Kotecha D; BigData@Heart Consortium; cardAIc group; RATE-AF trial team. Consumer wearable devices for evaluation of heart rate control using digoxin versus beta-blockers: the RATE-AF randomized trial. Nat Med. 2024 Jul;30(7):2030-2036. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03094-4. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
Kotecha D, Bunting KV, Gill SK, Mehta S, Stanbury M, Jones JC, Haynes S, Calvert MJ, Deeks JJ, Steeds RP, Strauss VY, Rahimi K, Camm AJ, Griffith M, Lip GYH, Townend JN, Kirchhof P; Rate Control Therapy Evaluation in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) Team. Effect of Digoxin vs Bisoprolol for Heart Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation on Patient-Reported Quality of Life: The RATE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Dec 22;324(24):2497-2508. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23138.
Kotecha D, Calvert M, Deeks JJ, Griffith M, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Mehta S, Slinn G, Stanbury M, Steeds RP, Townend JN. A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 20;7(7):e015099. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015099.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UBCCS_RATEAF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.