Left Atrium Reservoir Function Modulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Digoxin Versus Beta Blocker
NCT ID: NCT05540600
Last Updated: 2022-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-12
2023-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rate Control Therapy Evaluation in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF)
NCT02391337
Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Treatment in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00133211
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Compared to Rate Control Strategy in Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function
NCT02509754
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Ablation to Prevent Disease Progression of AF-induced Atrial Cardiomyopathy in Women and Men
NCT06200311
Study on Left Atrial Function of Atrial Fibrillation After Radiofrequency Ablation With Statin Therapy
NCT02776956
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is commonly accepted that ß blockers decrease AF-related symptoms by a negative chronotropic effect thanks to their blocking action on the sympathetic system. While the action of digoxin on symptoms goes through a positive inotropic effect thanks to the increase in intracellular calcium .
However, the impact of these two molecules on the function of the left atrium has never been investigated. Our diagnostic hypothesis is that in addition to their action on heart rate, the improvement of symptoms noted by using b blockers and digoxin during the treatment of AF would go through an improvement LA reservoir function . The superiority of digoxin in the reduction of symptoms compared to ß blockers would be due to a greater improvement in reservoir function and this thanks to the increase in myocardial intracellular calcium.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Digoxin group
Patients will receive digoxin 0.25 mg once daily for a duration of 4 weeks
Digoxin 0.25 mg
Patients will have the dose of one tablet of 0.25mg per day
beta blocker group
Patients will receive bisoprolol 2.5 mg or 5 m twice a day for a duration of 4 weeks. The choice of dose will depend on blood pressure (BP): If systolic BP ≥ 150 mmHG, the patient will have bisoprolol 5 mg x 2 per day, If systolic BP \< 150 mmHG, the patient will have bisoprolol 2.5 mg x 2 per day
Bisoprolol
Patients will have the dose of bisoprolol 2.5 mg or 5 mg twice a day based on the arterial pressure at randomization
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Digoxin 0.25 mg
Patients will have the dose of one tablet of 0.25mg per day
Bisoprolol
Patients will have the dose of bisoprolol 2.5 mg or 5 mg twice a day based on the arterial pressure at randomization
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Frequency Control Strategy Decided
* Age over 18 years
* Stable hemodynamic state
* No contraindication to digoxin or ß-blocker
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindication to one of the two
* Heart rate \<60 BPM
* Clearance rénale \<30 ml/mn
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
* Persistence of a resting heart rate \> 110
* Severe comorbidity with decreased life expectancy (advanced neoplasia, large stroke...)
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Monastir
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nidhal Bouchahda
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nidhal Bouchahda, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Monastir university
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fattouma Bourguiba University hospital
Monastir, , Tunisia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kotecha D, Bunting KV, Gill SK, Mehta S, Stanbury M, Jones JC, Haynes S, Calvert MJ, Deeks JJ, Steeds RP, Strauss VY, Rahimi K, Camm AJ, Griffith M, Lip GYH, Townend JN, Kirchhof P; Rate Control Therapy Evaluation in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) Team. Effect of Digoxin vs Bisoprolol for Heart Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation on Patient-Reported Quality of Life: The RATE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Dec 22;324(24):2497-2508. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23138.
Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, Hindricks G, Manolis AS, Oldgren J, Popescu BA, Schotten U, Van Putte B, Vardas P, Agewall S, Camm J, Baron Esquivias G, Budts W, Carerj S, Casselman F, Coca A, De Caterina R, Deftereos S, Dobrev D, Ferro JM, Filippatos G, Fitzsimons D, Gorenek B, Guenoun M, Hohnloser SH, Kolh P, Lip GY, Manolis A, McMurray J, Ponikowski P, Rosenhek R, Ruschitzka F, Savelieva I, Sharma S, Suwalski P, Tamargo JL, Taylor CJ, Van Gelder IC, Voors AA, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Zeppenfeld K. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Nov;50(5):e1-e88. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw313. Epub 2016 Sep 23. No abstract available.
Ziff OJ, Kotecha D. Digoxin: The good and the bad. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016 Oct;26(7):585-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
Badano LP, Kolias TJ, Muraru D, Abraham TP, Aurigemma G, Edvardsen T, D'Hooge J, Donal E, Fraser AG, Marwick T, Mertens L, Popescu BA, Sengupta PP, Lancellotti P, Thomas JD, Voigt JU; Industry representatives; Reviewers: This document was reviewed by members of the 2016-2018 EACVI Scientific Documents Committee. Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):591-600. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey042.
Bouchahda N, Bader M, Najjar A, Mghaieth Zghal F, Sassi G, Mourali MS, Ben Messaoud M. Effect of Digoxin vs Beta-Blockers on Left Atrial Strain for Heart Rate-Controlled Atrial Fibrillation: The DIGOBET-AF Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 May;25(3):411-418. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00705-w. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TN2022-NAT-I NS-86
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.