Cardiac Resynchronization in Atrial Fibrillation Trial - a Pilot Study
NCT ID: NCT01850277
Last Updated: 2015-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2017-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Resync-AF (Rate vs Rhythm Control in AF Patients With CRT-D)
NCT01233648
APAF: Assessment of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00111527
AV Junction Ablation or Optimal Medical Treatment in PatiEnts With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT05776797
Atrioventricular Junction Ablation and Biventricular Pacing for Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure
NCT02137187
Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure
NCT01082601
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
On the other hand, about 10% of patients with persistent forms of AF experience a spontaneous sinus rhythm (SR) resumption after CRT implantation. Moreover, SR resumption and it's maintenance by means of single external electrical cardioversion in AF patients has been proven feasible. A strategy of rhythm control in AF patients on CRT could provide high BiVp% and improve the efficacy of CRT in this group of patients.
To show superiority of the rhythm control strategy over the rate control strategy a sample size of 60 patients was calculated based on following assumptions: two-tailed test, a type I error of 0.05, a power of 80%, efficacy (mean BiVp%) of rate control strategy 90%, efficacy (mean BiVp%)of rhythm control strategy 98% and 8% drop-out rate to fulfill the criteria of intention-to-treat analysis. Due to presumed lack of statistical power the secondary end points and safety endpoints will be considered exploratory.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rhythm control
In this group a strategy to restore and maintain SR, including amiodarone and an external electrical cardioversion (EEC), is implemented. A procedure of AF ablation is possible but not obligatory.
At baseline, patients assigned to the group undergo a standard 12-lead ECG, a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), a cardiopulmonary exercise test(CPX), an echocardiography(ECHO), a standard device control; a serum thyroid -stimulating hormone (TSH) level is assessed and patients fill the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). Control visits are performed every 3 months including a 12-lead ECG measurement and a device control. On the visits in the 3rd and 12th month an ECHO, a CPX, a 6MWT are performed and a MLHFQ is filled; control TSH levels are assessed every 6 months.
Amiodarone
The pharmacological treatment in the rhythm control strategy consist of amiodarone given orally including the loading dose up to 600mg daily - for the first 4 weeks. Then, a maintenance dose of 200mg/daily is prescribed. The use of other anti-arrhythmic agents is possible unless they are contraindicated. The introduction of amiodarone must not be performed unless the patient is treated effectively with oral anticoagulants for 3 weeks at least. Discontinuation of amiodarone results neither in withdrawal from the study nor in change of the treatment arm.
External electrical cardioversion (EEC)
The first EEC is performed after the loading dose of amiodarone has been administered. A maximal number of shocks during one cardioversion is 3. The amount of the energy delivered during shocks is left at discretion of a physician performing the EEC. The EEC must be performed in accordance with the present guidelines on EEC and post-procedural care and the state of art.
If atrial fibrillation reoccur, the patient should undergo a next EEC as soon as possible but preserving the safety time margins (i.e. effective anticoagulation period). The maximal no. of EEC procedures is 3. If sinus rhythm resumption or its maintenance is impossible or AF reoccur after the 3rd EEC, a strategy of rhythm control is discontinued and a rate control strategy is implemented.
Rate control
In the latter group a pharmacotherapy to slow and control ventricular rate by means of pharmacotherapy and an atrio-ventricular junction ablation (AVJA) is implemented.
At baseline, each patient assigned to the rate control group undergoes a standard 12-lead ECG, a 6MWT, a CPX, an ECHO, a standard device control and a serum TSH level assessed. Moreover, the patient fills the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionaire (MLHFQ). The control visits are performed for one year, every 3 months including a standard 12-lead ECG measurement and standard control of the device. On the visits in the 3rd and 12th month additionally an ECHO, a CPX, a 6MWT are performed and a MLHFQ is filled. The control TSH levels are assessed every 6 months.
Pharmacotherapy to slow and control ventricular rate
The pharmacotherapy should be consistent with current guidelines. It should include negative chronotropic and negative dromotropic agents such as beta-blockers, digitalis and amiodarone (the use of other, less popular agents, is also possible). The choice of the agents as well as their dosages are left at discretion of the treating physician. The goal of the therapy is to obtain BiVp% \>95%
Atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA)
The procedure of atrioventricular junction ablation is dedicated to the patients in the rate control group in who the rate control is unsatisfactory. An AVJA procedure is not obligatory. The decision to perform an AVJA should be discussed with the patient and should be made collectively by the therapeutic team.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Amiodarone
The pharmacological treatment in the rhythm control strategy consist of amiodarone given orally including the loading dose up to 600mg daily - for the first 4 weeks. Then, a maintenance dose of 200mg/daily is prescribed. The use of other anti-arrhythmic agents is possible unless they are contraindicated. The introduction of amiodarone must not be performed unless the patient is treated effectively with oral anticoagulants for 3 weeks at least. Discontinuation of amiodarone results neither in withdrawal from the study nor in change of the treatment arm.
External electrical cardioversion (EEC)
The first EEC is performed after the loading dose of amiodarone has been administered. A maximal number of shocks during one cardioversion is 3. The amount of the energy delivered during shocks is left at discretion of a physician performing the EEC. The EEC must be performed in accordance with the present guidelines on EEC and post-procedural care and the state of art.
If atrial fibrillation reoccur, the patient should undergo a next EEC as soon as possible but preserving the safety time margins (i.e. effective anticoagulation period). The maximal no. of EEC procedures is 3. If sinus rhythm resumption or its maintenance is impossible or AF reoccur after the 3rd EEC, a strategy of rhythm control is discontinued and a rate control strategy is implemented.
Pharmacotherapy to slow and control ventricular rate
The pharmacotherapy should be consistent with current guidelines. It should include negative chronotropic and negative dromotropic agents such as beta-blockers, digitalis and amiodarone (the use of other, less popular agents, is also possible). The choice of the agents as well as their dosages are left at discretion of the treating physician. The goal of the therapy is to obtain BiVp% \>95%
Atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA)
The procedure of atrioventricular junction ablation is dedicated to the patients in the rate control group in who the rate control is unsatisfactory. An AVJA procedure is not obligatory. The decision to perform an AVJA should be discussed with the patient and should be made collectively by the therapeutic team.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 3 months after a procedure of a CRT device implantation
* A CRT device with a presence of a right atrial electrode
* Age: ≥18 years old
* Effectively biventricular paced captured beats \<95%
* Effective therapy with oral anticoagulants for at least 3 months
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant valve disease
* Advanced A-V block (including: AVJA)
* Contraindications to amiodarone (hyperthyroidism, not compensated hypothyroidism, drug intolerance, QT\>460ms for men, QT\>450 for women)
* Long-QT syndrome
* Decompensation of the heart failure within 48 hours before the qualification
* Cardiac transplantation in 6 months
* Life expectancy less than 1 year
* Chronic dialysis
* LA diameter \>6cm
* Alcohol abuse
* Pregnancy/lack of effective contraceptive therapy (in case of females in the reproductive age)
* Participation in other clinical trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jan B Ciszewski, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
Maciej Sterlinski, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institute of Cardiology, II Dept. of Coronary Heart Disease
Warsaw, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ciszewski JB, Tajstra M, Kowalik I, Maciag A, Chwyczko T, Jankowska A, Smolis-Bak E, Firek B, Zajac D, Karwowski J, Szwed H, Pytkowski M, Gasior M, Sterlinski M. Rhythm and rate control strategies in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation treated with cardiac resynchronization: the results of the randomized Pilot-CRAfT study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Oct 10. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02541-z. Online ahead of print.
Ciszewski J, Maciag A, Kowalik I, Syska P, Lewandowski M, Farkowski MM, Borowiec A, Chwyczko T, Pytkowski M, Szwed H, Sterlinski M. Comparison of the rhythm control treatment strategy versus the rate control strategy in patients with permanent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - a pilot study of Cardiac Resynchronization in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (Pilot-CRAfT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Oct 4;15:386. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-386.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IK-NP-0021-47/1378/13
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.