Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
1376 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2001-04-30
2007-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Mechanistic Exploratory Study of AF-induced Cardiac Dysfunction and Symptoms
NCT04987723
Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Treatment of AF in Heart Failure
NCT01411371
Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT00878384
Treatment Of Atrial Fibrillation In Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure
NCT04160000
AF at Home: A Virtual Education Program for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
NCT05810896
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis: Restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm reduces cardiovascular mortality compared to a rate control treatment strategy in patients with AF and CHF.
Rationale: Despite new therapeutic interventions, the prognosis of heart failure patients remains grim with 5-year survival rates usually less than 50%. In most recent, large CHF trials, AF has been reported to be independently associated with increased mortality. Non-randomized observations also suggest that patients with AF in the setting of CHF have a greater tendency to revert to sinus rhythm during amiodarone therapy or with newer class III antiarrhythmic agents and that those who maintain a normal rhythm have a better prognosis. There is a need to determine whether a treatment strategy that attempts to maintain sinus rhythm will have a beneficial impact on cardiovascular mortality in CHF patients. This hypothesis has never been tested in a prospective, controlled, adequately-powered randomized trial.
Research Plan: AF-CHF is a prospective, multicentre clinical trial (100 centres in Canada, the USA, and Europe), that will randomize 1,450 NYHA class II-IV CHF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction \>/=35% (NYHA class I patients with prior hospitalization for CHF or ejection fraction \</=25% are also eligible) and a history of significant AF (ECG documentation of either one episode lasting \>/=6 hours within the past 6 months, or an episode lasting \>/=10 minutes within the past 6 months in a patient with prior electrical cardioversion for AF) to one of two treatment strategies: 1) rhythm control with the use of electrical cardioversion if needed combined with antiarrhythmic drug therapy (amiodarone or other class III agents), and additional non-pharmacologic therapy in resistant patients, 2) rate control with the use of drugs (mainly beta-blockers plus digoxin) and/or pacemaker and AV nodal catheter ablation if necessary. The enrollment period will be completed within 2 years with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Both groups will receive optimal CHF management with ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers. Cardiovascular mortality will be the primary endpoint of the trial. The intention-to-treat approach will be the primary method of analysis. Secondary outcomes are total mortality, hospitalization, stroke, cost of therapy and quality of life. From recent trial data, we anticipate a 18.75% 2-year cardiovascular mortality in the rate control arm and a 25% reduction in cardiovascular mortality in the rhythm control group. Assuming a 2% loss to follow-up, a two-sided alpha level of 0.05 and an annual accrual rate of 750 patients, we calculate that 722 patients per group (rounded total number of 1,450 patients) will be necessary to achieve a power of 0.80 when performing a log-rank test. The Research Centre of the Montreal Heart Institute will be the Coordinating and Methods Centre.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rate control
Rate vs rhythm control strategies for atrial fibrillation
Rate vs rhythm control strategies for atrial fibrillation
Rhythm control
Rate vs rhythm control strategies in atrial fibrillation
rate vs rhythm control strategies in atrial fibrillation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rate vs rhythm control strategies for atrial fibrillation
Rate vs rhythm control strategies for atrial fibrillation
Rate vs rhythm control strategies in atrial fibrillation
rate vs rhythm control strategies in atrial fibrillation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Symptomatic CHF (NYHA class II-IV) at some time during the 6 months before randomization, despite therapy with an ACE inhibitor (however, patients who do not tolerate an ACE inhibitor are eligible). Asymptomatic patients (NYHA class I) with either a prior hospitalization for CHF during the 6 months before randomization or with a left ventricular ejection fraction of \</=25% are also eligible.
3. History of significant AF, defined as either:
1. one episode lasting \>/=6 hours (duration of AF will be determined by history), within the past 6 months with electrocardiographic confirmation; or
2. an episode lasting \>/=10 minutes (by history) within the past 6 months with electrocardiographic confirmation in a patient with a prior electrical cardioversion for AF.
4. In the opinion of the clinical investigator, the patient must be eligible for long-term treatment with either treatment strategy of AF.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Reversible cause of AF such as acute pericarditis, pulmonary embolism, hyperthyroidism, alcohol intoxication.
3. AF occurring and not persisting beyond 10 days of surgery or myocardial infarction.
4. Reversible cause of CHF such as severe aortic or mitral stenosis and tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy.
5. Decompensated CHF within 48 hours of randomization.
6. Antiarrhythmic drugs other than calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers or digoxin required for other arrhythmias or other indications.
7. More than 7 days of amiodarone therapy within the last month prior to randomization.
8. Second or third degree AV block, sinus pause \>3 seconds, resting heart rate \<50 bpm without a permanent pacemaker.
9. History of drug-induced Torsades de Pointes or congenital long QT syndrome.
10. Prior AV nodal ablation or Maze surgery.
11. Probable cardiac transplantation in the next 6 months.
12. Chronic renal failure requiring dialysis.
13. Women of child-bearing potential and not on a reliable method of birth control.
14. Geographic or social factors, drug or alcohol abuse making follow-up or compliance difficult.
15. Other noncardiovascular medical condition (such as cancer) making 1 year survival unlikely.
16. Less than 18 years of age.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Montreal Heart Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Montreal Heart Institute
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Denis Roy
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Montreal Heart Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
O'Meara E, Khairy P, Blanchet MC, de Denus S, Pedersen OD, Levesque S, Talajic M, Ducharme A, White M, Racine N, Rouleau JL, Tardif JC, Roy D; AF-CHF investigators. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and cardiovascular mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction: insights from the Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):586-93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.965160. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Habra M, Talajic M, Khairy P, Dorian P, Roy D; Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure Investigators. Elevated depression symptoms predict long-term cardiovascular mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Circulation. 2009 Jul 14;120(2):134-40, 3p following 140. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.851675. Epub 2009 Jun 29.
Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S, Wyse DG, Dorian P, Lee KL, Bourassa MG, Arnold JM, Buxton AE, Camm AJ, Connolly SJ, Dubuc M, Ducharme A, Guerra PG, Hohnloser SH, Lambert J, Le Heuzey JY, O'Hara G, Pedersen OD, Rouleau JL, Singh BN, Stevenson LW, Stevenson WG, Thibault B, Waldo AL; Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure Investigators. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 19;358(25):2667-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708789.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ISRCTN84858671
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
41552
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.