Rate Control Versus Rhythm Control For Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT02132767

Last Updated: 2019-03-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

523 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the therapeutic strategies of rate control versus rhythm control in cardiac surgery patients who develop in-hospital postoperative atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (AF). In patients who develop AF during hospitalization after cardiac surgery, the hypothesis is that a strategy of rhythm control will reduce days in hospital within 60 days of the occurrence of AF compared to a strategy of rate control.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of the research is to compare two strategies for treating atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, both of which are referred to as AF, after cardiac surgery. AF is the most common complication after cardiac surgery. AF is when the upper chambers of the heart (atria) experience disorganized electrical activity which causes the heart beat to be irregular. The two treatment strategies to be used in this study are called rhythm control and rate control. The rhythm control strategy will attempt to bring the heart beat back to a regular rhythm using treatments known and approved to control heart rhythm. The rate control strategy will attempt to bring the heart rate to less than 100 beats per minute at rest using medications known and recommended to control heart rate. Both strategies are commonly used to treat AF. All of the medications that will be used in this study are the standard of care for use in patients experiencing AF. This research seeks to determine whether rhythm control is better than rate control in patients with AF after cardiac surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rhythm control

Rhythm Control in post-operative AF

Amiodarone and/or DC-cardioversion

Amiodarone Initial Dose

* Oral: 400 mg po TID for 3 days is recommended
* For patients incapable of taking oral: 150 mg IV bolus over 10 min, then 1 mg/min over 6 hours followed by 0.5 mg/min over 18 hours Maintenance Dose
* Oral: at least 200 mg/day to be continued until 60 days after randomization
* If drug cannot be given orally or via NG tube: 0.5 mg/min administered through central line (e.g., PICC) until oral dosing is started

DC-Cardioversion - frequency and duration determined by medical professional as medically needed

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Amiodarone

Intervention Type DRUG

Amiodarone Initial Dose

* Oral: 400 mg po TID for 3 days is recommended
* For patients incapable of taking oral: 150 mg IV bolus over 10 min, then 1 mg/min over 6 hours followed by 0.5 mg/min over 18 hours Maintenance Dose
* Oral: at least 200 mg/day to be continued until 60 days after randomization
* If drug cannot be given orally or via NG tube: 0.5 mg/min administered through central line (e.g., PICC) until oral dosing is started

DC-cardioversion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

DC-Cardioversion - frequency and duration determined by medical professional as medically needed

Rate control

Rate Control in post-operative AF

Beta-blocker and/or Calcium channel blockers and/or Digoxin

Dose, frequency and duration determined by medical professional as medically needed

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rate Control

Intervention Type DRUG

Beta-blocker and/or Calcium channel blockers and/or Digoxin - Dose, frequency and duration determined by medical professional as medically needed

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Amiodarone

Amiodarone Initial Dose

* Oral: 400 mg po TID for 3 days is recommended
* For patients incapable of taking oral: 150 mg IV bolus over 10 min, then 1 mg/min over 6 hours followed by 0.5 mg/min over 18 hours Maintenance Dose
* Oral: at least 200 mg/day to be continued until 60 days after randomization
* If drug cannot be given orally or via NG tube: 0.5 mg/min administered through central line (e.g., PICC) until oral dosing is started

Intervention Type DRUG

DC-cardioversion

DC-Cardioversion - frequency and duration determined by medical professional as medically needed

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Rate Control

Beta-blocker and/or Calcium channel blockers and/or Digoxin - Dose, frequency and duration determined by medical professional as medically needed

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cordarone Direct Current Cardioversion Beta-blocker Calcium channel blockers Digoxin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years
* Undergoing heart surgery for coronary artery bypass (on-pump or off-pump CABG) and/or valve repair or replacement (excluding mechanical valves), including re-operations
* Hemodynamically stable


* AF that persists for \> 60 minutes or recurrent (more than one) episodes of AF up to 7 days after surgery during the index hospitalization.

Exclusion Criteria

* LVAD insertion or heart transplantation
* Maze procedure
* TAVR
* History of or planned mechanical valve replacement
* Correction of complex congenital cardiac defect (excluding bicuspid aortic valve, atrial septal defect or PFO)
* History of AF or AFL
* History of AF or AFL ablation
* Contraindications to warfarin or amiodarone
* Need for long-term anticoagulation
* Concurrent participation in an interventional (drug or device) trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Annetine Gelijns

Professor and Chair, Health Evidence and Policy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Wiesel, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network

Patrick T O'Gara, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Southern California

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

NIH Heart Center at Suburban Hospital

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Health Services

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Einstein Heart Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Mission Hospital

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor Research Institute

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Virginia Health Systems

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

University of Alberta Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal Heart Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie de Quebec (Hopital Laval)

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Afifi A. CTS trials network: Rate control vs rhythm control for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery - Do bitter pills have blessed effects? Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2016 Jun 30;2016(2):e201615. doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2016.15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29043263 (View on PubMed)

Gillinov AM, Bagiella E, Moskowitz AJ, Raiten JM, Groh MA, Bowdish ME, Ailawadi G, Kirkwood KA, Perrault LP, Parides MK, Smith RL 2nd, Kern JA, Dussault G, Hackmann AE, Jeffries NO, Miller MA, Taddei-Peters WC, Rose EA, Weisel RD, Williams DL, Mangusan RF, Argenziano M, Moquete EG, O'Sullivan KL, Pellerin M, Shah KJ, Gammie JS, Mayer ML, Voisine P, Gelijns AC, O'Gara PT, Mack MJ; CTSN. Rate Control versus Rhythm Control for Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2016 May 19;374(20):1911-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602002. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27043047 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.ctsurgerynet.org/

Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network Website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5U01HL088942-08

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

GCO 08-1078-00007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.