The ISEO Biofeedback Tool During the Rehabilitation of Patients Treated for Rotator Cuff Tear

NCT ID: NCT04521504

Last Updated: 2020-08-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-21

Study Completion Date

2020-02-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present study addresses the issue about post-surgical recovery process, for patients arthroscopically treated for rotator-cuff tear. The aim of the research is to test the effectiveness of a new rehabilitation protocol that includes kinematic biofeedback with the motion analysis system ISEO.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The research includes at least 62 patients arthroscopically treated for the rotator cuff tear. For this purpose, two groups of patients of equal size are identified. The attribution of each patient to one of the two groups is random. The standard rehabilitation protocol is applied to the Control group (Group A), whereas the standard rehabilitation protocol integrated by proprioception exercises (physical therapist assisted) performed with ISEO is applied to the Experimental group (Group B). The primary objective is to verify if the ISEO system, used as a biofeedback tool, improves shoulder functionality and activity of patients arthroscopically treated for rotator cuff tear, both in the short (90 days from surgery) and in the medium term (6-12 months from surgery). All patients are longitudinally evaluated from the pre-surgery to a 6/12 months follow-up. Each evaluation includes both a clinical and an instrumented assessment of shoulder kinematics. The primary outcome tested is the Scapula-Weighted Constant-Murley Score, which represents a reformulation of the Constant-Murley Score, which is modified based on the quality of the scapular movement measured with ISEO.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rotator Cuff Tears

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study considers participants divided in two groups: the control group and the experimental group.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Biofeedback

Patients were treated with an experimental rehabilitation protocol, based on shoulder kinematic biofeedback.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Kinematic biofeedback with ISEO motion analysis system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Exercises are performed with the help of the ISEO motion analysis system, that provides a real-time biofeedback of shoulder kinematics. All exercises are administered by the Physical Therapist.

Control

Patients were treated with a standard rehabilitation protocol, based on hospital guidelines.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Kinematic biofeedback with ISEO motion analysis system

Exercises are performed with the help of the ISEO motion analysis system, that provides a real-time biofeedback of shoulder kinematics. All exercises are administered by the Physical Therapist.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with rotator cuff injuries;
* asymptomatic contralateral shoulder, that can be considered as a reference for the differential evaluation;
* indication for arthroscopy;
* employees;
* rehabilitation executed at AUSL-Romagna.

Exclusion Criteria

* irreparable injuries of the rotator cuff;
* contralateral painful shoulder;
* patients being treated for cancer in the last 6 months;
* patients with concomitant neurological pathologies;
* patients with spinal cord injuries;
* patients with cuff lesions with infectious processes;
* patients with severe scoliosis;
* patients with recurrent lesions of the cuff;
* patients with occupational diseases or work-related accidents;
* patients for whom the return to work cannot be reliably established.
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AUSL Romagna Rimini

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maria V Filippi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AUSL della Romagna

Paolo Paladini, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AUSL della Romagna

Riccardo Galassi, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AUSL della Romagna

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AUSL della Romagna - Cervesi Hospital

Cattolica, Rimini, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Parel I, Jaspers E, DE Baets L, Amoresano A, Cutti AG. Motion analysis of the shoulder in adults: kinematics and electromyography for the clinical practice. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Aug;52(4):575-82. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27434612 (View on PubMed)

Cutti AG, Parel I, Pellegrini A, Paladini P, Sacchetti R, Porcellini G, Merolla G. The Constant score and the assessment of scapula dyskinesis: Proposal and assessment of an integrated outcome measure. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016 Aug;29:81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26184668 (View on PubMed)

Cutti AG, Parel I, Raggi M, Petracci E, Pellegrini A, Accardo AP, Sacchetti R, Porcellini G. Prediction bands and intervals for the scapulo-humeral coordination based on the Bootstrap and two Gaussian methods. J Biomech. 2014 Mar 21;47(5):1035-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.028. Epub 2014 Jan 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24485513 (View on PubMed)

Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Sojbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P. A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.022. Epub 2008 Jan 22. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18218327 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PDT1-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Results of Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT01549912 COMPLETED