The Effects of Kinesio Tape Application With Different Verbal Input Given to With Patients With Rotator Cuff Tear
NCT ID: NCT03073655
Last Updated: 2017-03-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
87 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Kinesiotaping on Muscular Activity, Mobility, Strength and Pain After Rotator Cuff Surgery
NCT03379636
Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Pain, Functionality, Proprioception and Kinesiophobia in Partial Rotator Cuff Tear
NCT06875895
Dynamic Taping in Symptomatic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
NCT05029544
Effect of Kinesio Tape on Pain, Muscle Strength, Functionality and Kinesiophobia in Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
NCT06559124
Effectiveness of Video-Based Rehabilitation Program on Pain, Functionality and Quality of Life in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT03373799
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
it has been limited evidence of KT is effective
Negative Verbal Input
The treatment group received a standardized therapeutic KT application. The physical therapist said that it has been limited evidence of KT is effective during application.
Group 2
it has been not known that KT is effective or not
Neutral Verbal Input
The treatment group received a standardized therapeutic KT application. The physical therapist said that it has been not known that KT is effective or not during application.
Group 3
it has been known that KT has excellent result
Positive Verbal Input
The treatment group received a standardized therapeutic KT application. The physical therapist said that it has been known that KT has excellent result during application.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Negative Verbal Input
The treatment group received a standardized therapeutic KT application. The physical therapist said that it has been limited evidence of KT is effective during application.
Neutral Verbal Input
The treatment group received a standardized therapeutic KT application. The physical therapist said that it has been not known that KT is effective or not during application.
Positive Verbal Input
The treatment group received a standardized therapeutic KT application. The physical therapist said that it has been known that KT has excellent result during application.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No episodes of shoulder instability
* No radiographic signs of fracture of the glenoid or the greater or lesser tuberosity MRI evidence of cuff tear
* Duration of symptoms of at least 3 months,
* Inadequate response to nonoperative management (including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, rest, and 1 local corticosteroid injection) Positive empty can test indicating possible supraspinatus involvement
* Positive Hawkins-Kennedy test indicating possible external impingement, -Subjective complaint of difficulty performing activities of daily living
* 20 to 50 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior surgery on the affected shoulder
* Inability to complete questionnaires because of language problem or cognitive disorder
* Shoulder girdle fracture
* Glenohumeral dislocation/subluxation
* Acromioclavicular sprain
* Concomitant cervical spine symptoms
* A history of shoulder surgery
* Patients who did not accept to participate
* Patients who did not come to the second evaluation.
20 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yıldız Analay Akbaba
Assist Prof.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.