Comparison of Surgical Site Infection After Skin Closure by Prolene or Staples in Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty Patients
NCT ID: NCT04492852
Last Updated: 2020-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
82 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-11-30
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Interventions:
The study will have 2 intervention arms. The patients will be randomized to receive either Prolene sutures for wound closure or staple sutures for wound closure. After the application of the intervention, routine care would be given to the patients postoperatively.
Hypothesis:
The investigators hypothesize that there is no difference in the incidence of surgical site infection in bilateral TKR patients with wound closure by Prolene vs staple.
Study Design:
This study will be conducted as an open blinded, parallel design, equivalence randomized controlled trial. The patients would be randomized to receive either of the two interventions i.e. Prolene or Staple sutures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of Knotless Suture for Closure of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties
NCT00834483
Topical Anesthesia for Removal of Stitches After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02812602
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Cemented Versus Cementless Tibial Prosthesis Study
NCT01041937
Efficacy of Wound Care and Reduction of Wound Complications by Use of AQUACEL® Ag Surgical Dressing in MIS TKA
NCT02445300
Tissue Adhaesive in Wound Closure Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03289247
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Enrollment will be a continuous process with screening and enrolling eligible patients admitted through the clinic electively for primary TKR. Informed consent will be taken from the patient as per routine protocol before the arthroplasty procedures in the hospital. Research objectives, methodology, risks, and benefits will be explained in detail. Consent for the participation in the study will only be taken by the primary investigator at his clinic or the surgical resident on call preoperatively along with the consent for the surgical procedure.
Pre-Randomization Evaluations Screening:
The screening will involve the routine history taking and physical examination by the doctor and nursing staff in the clinic. Screening won't involve performing procedures that are not part of routine management.
On-study/on-intervention evaluations:
After screening and assessing the eligibility, patients will be randomly allocated by a 1:1 ratio to the two intervention groups i.e. prolene or staple using a computer-generated randomization sequence by the clinical trials unit (CTU), which they will provide to the PI, after patients' admission in the hospital. Patients will be followed from the time they reach the ward after surgery until their hospital discharge, which is usually around 7 days.
Data Collection:
The data collection will be done by the surgical site infection (SSI) nurses from the infection control department of AKUH. These nurses are well-trained to assess the surgical site infections in all the surgery patients admitted to the hospital. Training of data collectors will be done by the PI to ensure the reliability and validity of the study. The data collectors will be strictly instructed to respect the autonomy of participants. Data collection will be done by the data collectors under the supervision of the PI and CTU. Questionnaires will be checked for consistency and logical data entries. Data entry will be done, and counter checked by the PI at regular intervals.
Data Storage:
Data collected will be coded and kept confidential without the identifiable information of patients. The confidentiality of the study participants will be maintained throughout the study period. Data collected will be kept confidential without identifiable information of patients who are identified by a number assigned. The hard copy forms will be retained in a secured location with the PI after data entry into computer software and will be kept as per hospital protocol. The password-protected drives will be used to store data with only the PI having access to it. The data will be available for AKUH ethical review committee on request and might be published in a journal without disclosing any identifiable information of patients. Filled questionnaires will be stored for 5 years after the study is completed as per the policy of the institute.
Sample Size:
The sample size was calculated via open epi software version 3.01. The level of significance was kept at 5% with a power of 80%. The percentage of exposed (staple sutures) with outcome (surgical site infection) was 66%. The percentage of non-exposed (Prolene sutures) with outcome (surgical site infection) was 33%. The estimated risk ratio taken from a study was 2. After adding the non-response rate of 10% the final sample size came out to be 82 patients with 41 patients in each arm.
Plan of Analysis:
Statistical analysis will be done by using STATA software version 15. The normality assumption for the quantitative variables would be assessed using the shapiro wilk test. Mean ± SD will be computed for all the normally distributed quantitative variables. The median and interquartile range would be reported for the non-normally distributed quantitative variables. The categorical variables would be expressed in frequencies and percentages. The Cox Proportional Hazard regression will be used for the univariate and multivariable analysis. Univariate analysis will be conducted, and crude risk ratios and their 95% confidence intervals will be obtained. All significant independent variables at the univariate stage will be regressed in a multivariable cox proportional hazard regression using the stepwise method in the multivariable model and the adjusted risk ratios will be obtained.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Interventional Arm 1
After total knee replacement, the skin closure of the patients in this group will be done using polypropylene (PROLENE) sutures.
Polypropylene (PROLENE) sutures
After total knee replacement, the skin closure of the patients in this group will be done using polypropylene (PROLENE) sutures.
Interventional Arm 2
After total knee replacement, the skin closure of the patients in this group will be done using staple sutures.
Staple Sutures
After total knee replacement, the skin closure of the patients in this group will be done using staple sutures.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Polypropylene (PROLENE) sutures
After total knee replacement, the skin closure of the patients in this group will be done using polypropylene (PROLENE) sutures.
Staple Sutures
After total knee replacement, the skin closure of the patients in this group will be done using staple sutures.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergoing bilateral knee arthroplasty at AKUH Karachi.
* Both the genders would be included.
* Patients having American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) level of I, II and III
* Patients having functional class of I, II and III pre-operatively
* Patients opting to undergo Bilateral knee arthroplasty under care of the selected surgeon (A) for the study.
* Patients undergoing bilateral TKR electively
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients unable to comprehend due to the language barrier
* Patients who have a Glasgow Coma Scale i.e. GCS\<15 (cognitive impairment)
* Patients undergoing a knee revision surgery
* Patients having a previous incision/scar in the operative field will be excluded
* Patients having documented allergy to Prolene or stainless steel
* Patients having a documented underlying malignancy
* Patients undergoing unilateral TKR or staged bilateral TKR
* Patients undergoing emergency TKR.
* Patients having undergoing surgery due to trauma or fracture
40 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aga Khan University
OTHER
Indus Hospital and Health Network
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahsun Jiwani
Junior Biostatistician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahsun Jiwani, MSc. Epibio
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Indus Hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Liu S, Wang Y, Kotian RN, Li H, Mi Y, Zhang Y, He X. Comparison of Nonabsorbable and Absorbable Suture in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Med Sci Monit. 2018 Oct 23;24:7563-7569. doi: 10.12659/MSM.910785.
Barrow J, Divecha H, Board T. Skin closure in arthroplasty surgery: Current practice. Int Wound J. 2018 Dec;15(6):966-970. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12956. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
Smith TO, Sexton D, Mann C, Donell S. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010 Mar 16;340:c1199. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1199.
Gatt D, Quick CR, Owen-Smith MS. Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985 Sep;67(5):318-20.
Clayer M, Southwood RT. Comparative study of skin closure in hip surgery. Aust N Z J Surg. 1991 May;61(5):363-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1991.tb00235.x.
Khan RJ, Fick D, Yao F, Tang K, Hurworth M, Nivbrant B, Wood D. A comparison of three methods of wound closure following arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Feb;88(2):238-42. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.16923.
Hasan O, Jiwani A, Mazhar L, Begum D, Lakdawala R, Noordin S. Comparison of Surgical Site Infection After Skin Closure by Prolene or Staples in Bilateral Simultaneous Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Parallel Design Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. Int J Surg Protoc. 2021 Aug 6;25(1):154-159. doi: 10.29337/ijsp.153. eCollection 2021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
456-784-7
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.