Cemented vs Cementless TKA

NCT ID: NCT03683992

Last Updated: 2024-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

147 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare cemented and cementless versions of the Triathlon total knee arthroplasty/replacement (TKA) in terms of clinical outcomes, perioperative course, and outcome scores including function and patient satisfaction.

Patients who present to the clinical practices of Dr. Ryan Nunley, Dr. Robert Barrack, or Dr. Denis Nam and are suitable candidates for primary TKA will be screened for eligibility and invited to participate. Once enrolled participants will be randomized (1:1) to either receive a cemented or cementless Triathlon TKA. Data collected for the study will include standard of care clinical and radiographic evaluations collected during office visits and surgery, as well as study-specific patient questionnaires. Clinical, radiographic and questionnaire data will be collected pre-operatively, at the time of surgery, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and beyond, and 2 years and beyond post-operatively. Patients will complete the following outcomes questionnaires preoperatively: New Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, UCLA Activity Score, SF-12, and EQ-5D. The following questionnaires will be collected at four to six weeks, six months, one year and beyond, and two years and beyond postoperatively: New Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, Washington University Knee Satisfaction and Function Questionnaire, Oxford Knee Score, UCLA Activity Score, SF-12, and EQ-5D, and a Pain Drawing. In addition, a Pain Diary with a pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be assessed once daily at home for 6 weeks after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to compare cemented and cementless versions of the Triathlon total knee arthroplasty/replacement (TKA) in terms of clinical outcomes, perioperative course, and outcome scores including function and patient satisfaction.

Patients who present to the clinical practices of Dr. Ryan Nunley, Dr. Robert Barrack, or Dr. Denis Nam and are suitable candidates for primary TKA will be screened for eligibility and invited to participate. Once enrolled participants will be randomized (1:1) to either receive a cemented or cementless Triathlon TKA. Data collected for the study will include standard of care clinical and radiographic evaluations collected during office visits and surgery, as well as study-specific patient questionnaires. Clinical, radiographic and questionnaire data will be collected pre-operatively, at the time of surgery, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and beyond, and 2 years and beyond post-operatively. Patients will complete the following outcomes questionnaires preoperatively: New Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, UCLA Activity Score, SF-12, and EQ-5D. The following questionnaires will be collected at four to six weeks, six months, one year and beyond, and two years and beyond postoperatively: New Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, Washington University Knee Satisfaction and Function Questionnaire, Oxford Knee Score, UCLA Activity Score, SF-12, and EQ-5D, and a Pain Drawing. In addition, a Pain Diary with a pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be assessed once daily at home for 6 weeks after surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cemented and cementless Triathlon group

cemented group are patients who get randomized to receive cemented knee implant and Patient randomized to receiving cement less knee implant.

Triathlon total knee system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantable

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Triathlon total knee system

Implantable

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who qualify for a cementless primary total knee arthroplasty\*
* 18 years of age but no more than 75 years of age
* Willing to be randomized
* Willing to sign informed consent
* Willing to return for all follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with inflammatory arthritis
* BMI equal to 40 or less.
* Patient with an active infection or suspected infection in the operative joint
* The absolute and relative contraindications stated in the FDA cleared labeling for the device
* Patients who have undergone osteotomy
* Patients who have had previous patella fracture or surgery
* Patients who have had previous healed tibia or femur fractures
* Patients who have had previous knee or hip replacement surgery on the ipsilateral side
* Patients who require patellar resurfacing
* Patients with major medical/muscular/orthopedic deformities
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington University Medical School

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201308057

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

All-poly Versus Metal-backed
NCT04358601 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Cemented vs Cementless Persona Keel RCT
NCT05630053 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Triathlon All-Polyethylene Tibia Outcomes Study
NCT04636190 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Clinical Outcomes of Joint Arthroplasty
NCT03668691 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments Outcomes Study
NCT02521103 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA