Cemented vs. Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT05616884
Last Updated: 2023-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-08
2026-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement
NCT01194817
Evaluation of Two Surgical Strategies for Robotic Implantation of Total Knee Prostheses (Stryker), Cemented Versus Uncemented
NCT04692714
Does Implant Design Improve Postoperative Flexion?
NCT00380861
Comparison of A Mobile-Bearing Total Knee System With A Fixed-Bearing Total Knee System In Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00589108
Cemented vs Cementless Persona Keel RCT
NCT05630053
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cementless
Cementless fixation partial knee replacement
Cementless fixation
Three dimensional printed porous metal, a biomaterial with morphological and mechanical properties that resemble those of native trabecular bone, is now being used for fixation of the tibial component in unicondylar knee arthroplasty. This can reliably achieve osseointegration into the tibia and could lead to a lower risk of aseptic loosening which is the leading cause of revision in partial knee replacements.
Cemented
Cemented fixation partial knee replacement
Cementless fixation
Three dimensional printed porous metal, a biomaterial with morphological and mechanical properties that resemble those of native trabecular bone, is now being used for fixation of the tibial component in unicondylar knee arthroplasty. This can reliably achieve osseointegration into the tibia and could lead to a lower risk of aseptic loosening which is the leading cause of revision in partial knee replacements.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cementless fixation
Three dimensional printed porous metal, a biomaterial with morphological and mechanical properties that resemble those of native trabecular bone, is now being used for fixation of the tibial component in unicondylar knee arthroplasty. This can reliably achieve osseointegration into the tibia and could lead to a lower risk of aseptic loosening which is the leading cause of revision in partial knee replacements.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* medial fixed bearing partial knee replacement
* bone suitable for both cemented and cementless fixation after review of the preoperative radiographs.
Exclusion Criteria
* current smokers
* grossly porotic bone
* advanced other compartment arthritis at the time of surgery necessitating a total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
* previous high tibial osteotomy with prior hardware
* patients who are randomized but are deemed unsuitable to receive the assigned implant by the surgeon due to bone quality or bone cuts
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kevin B. Fricka, MD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Hopper
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Alexandria, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRJ123
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.