GMK-UNI Anatomical UKA: Fixation of Cemented vs Cementless Designs

NCT ID: NCT03522025

Last Updated: 2025-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-15

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is the principal surgical alternative to the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with end-stage unicompartmental tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The current comparative randomized study aims to evaluate the fixation of cemented and cementless designs of GMK-UNI unicompartmental knee prosthesis over a 5-year time period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Primary objective is to compare the quality of fixation of cemented and cementless designs of GMK-UNI unicompartmental knee replacement at 2 years of follow-up.

The Secondary objectives include the evaluation of the patient improvement (subjective and objective) using the new Knee Society Score (KSS); the patient's anterior pain following UKA and any eventual patella-femoral disorder; Implant survival rate using the Kaplan Meier analysis; Post-op radiological findings and Adverse Events.

The Primary outcome aims to compare the occurrence of radiolucency's lines (both partial and complete) between the two study groups. Secondary outcomes include New KSS, OKS, Kaplan Meier analysis and stability and fixation of UNI prosthesis.

All patients who meet the inclusion criteria to take part in the current clinical study will be invited to participate before the surgery.

Subjects will be randomized during the screening; half of them will receive the cemented GMK-UNI anatomical UKA and the other half the cementless GMK-UNI anatomical UKA.

Clinical data will be recorded on CRF at those time-points:

* Before the surgery
* During the surgery
* After the surgery at 3 months, 1, 2, 3 and 5 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GMK-UNI cemented fixation prosthesis

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is a less invasive treatment option compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with primary anteromedial knee osteoarthritis.

GMK-UNI cementless fixation prosthesis

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is a less invasive treatment option compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with primary anteromedial knee osteoarthritis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA)

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is a less invasive treatment option compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with primary anteromedial knee osteoarthritis.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with end-stage unicompartmental tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee that meet the indications for use according to Medacta implants included in this study (on-label use);
* Those suffering from unilateral osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis of the medial compartment;
* Frontal deformity \< 10° (evaluated on weight-bearing long-axis x-rays);
* Flexion contracture \< 10°;
* Intact ligaments;
* Patients who are willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study. Written informed consent must be obtained prior to the patient's surgery;
* Patient's age over 18 years old;
* Patient with BMI \< 40 kg/m2;
* Patients must be willing to comply with the pre and post-operative evaluation schedule.

* Patients aged under 18 years;

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with one or more medical conditions identified as a contraindication defined by the labelling on any Medacta implants used in this study;
* Any patient who cannot or will not provide informed consent for participation in the study;
* Patients who need to undergo lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty;
* Patients who need a revision surgery;
* Patients who need a patella-femoral joint prosthesis;
* Patients who had previously undergone high tibial osteotomy or ACL reconstruction;
* Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2;
* Patients unable to understand and take action;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medacta International SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinique Saint Vincent de Paul

Bourgoin, France, France

Site Status

Clinique du Mail

La Rochelle, France, France

Site Status

Centre Orthéo, Espace Fauriel

Saint-Etienne, France, France

Site Status

CHP Saint-Grégoire

Saint-Grégoire, France, France

Site Status

Dr. Näder Helmy

Solothurn, Switzerland, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017-01677

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Anatomic Congruent Prosthetic Knee Design
NCT03633201 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Uncemented Tritanium TKR vs Cemented Triathlon TKR
NCT04040764 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Personalizing MPK Prescription
NCT06399471 COMPLETED NA
Cemented vs Cementless Persona Keel RCT
NCT05630053 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA