Evaluation of Triathlon - a New Total Knee Prosthesis System - Triathlon vs. Duracon

NCT ID: NCT00436982

Last Updated: 2024-02-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-02-28

Study Completion Date

2017-01-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective is to investigate the Clinical, Radiographic, Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric behaviour and patient outcome when using the Triathlon total knee prosthesis in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The evaluation is carried out by a prospective randomised RSA-study with Triathlon cemented knee prosthesis versus Duracon cemented knee prosthesis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cemented Triathlon total knee system

The Triathlon total knee system is the successor of the Duracon total knee system and was observed in a prospective randomised, parallel, double-blind study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cemented Triathlon total knee system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Orthopaedic implant

Cemented Duracon total knee system

The Duracon total knee system is the predecessor of the Triathlon total knee system and was observed in a prospective randomised, parallel, double-blind study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Duracon total knee system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Orthopaedic implant

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cemented Triathlon total knee system

Orthopaedic implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

Duracon total knee system

Orthopaedic implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients suffering exclusively from osteo arthritis (OA), Stage II-V \[Ahlbäck, 1968\] will be operated.
2. Patients requiring knee prosthesis, suitable for the use of Duracon and Triathlon knee system
3. Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing and able to comply with the post-operative scheduled clinical and radiographical evaluations and the prescribed rehabilitation.
4. Patients who signed the Ethics Committee approved Informed Consent Form prior to surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous major knee surgery
2. Other significant disabling problems from the muscular-skeletal system than in the knees
3. Obese patients where obesity is severe enough to affect subject's ability to perform activities of daily living (body mass index, kg/m2: BMI above 35).
4. Patients with active or suspected infection.
5. Patients with malignancy - active malignancy.
6. Patients with severe osteoporosis, Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy.
7. Patients immunologically suppressed, or receiving steroids in excess of physiologic dose requirements.
8. The patient has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficit which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device or the patient has a neurological deficit which interferes with the patient's ability to limit weight bearing or places an extreme load on the implant during the healing period.
9. Female patients planning a pregnancy during the course of the study.
10. Patients with systemic or metabolic disorders leading to progressive bone deterioration.
11. Patients, who as judged by the surgeon, are mentally incompetent or are unlikely to be compliant with the prescribed post-operative routine and follow-up evaluation schedule.
12. Patients with other severe concurrent joint involvements, which can affect their outcome.
13. Patients with other concurrent illnesses, which are likely to affect their outcome such as sickle cell anaemia, systemic lupus erythematosus or renal disease requiring dialysis.
14. Patients under the protection of law (e.g. guardianship).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stryker Orthopaedics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sören Toksvig-Larsen, ass. prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of ortopaedics, Hässleholm Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hässleholm Hospital

Hässleholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Molt M, Ljung P, Toksvig-Larsen S. Does a new knee design perform as well as the design it replaces? Bone Joint Res. 2012 Dec 1;1(12):315-23. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.112.2000064. Print 2012 Dec.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23610663 (View on PubMed)

Molt M, Toksvig-Larsen S. Similar early migration when comparing CR and PS in Triathlon TKA: A prospective randomised RSA trial. Knee. 2014 Oct;21(5):949-54. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Jun 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24974301 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

K-S-015_1

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

K-S-015 Triathlon RSA_1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

All-poly Versus Metal-backed
NCT04358601 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Triathlon All-Polyethylene Tibia Outcomes Study
NCT04636190 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments Outcomes Study
NCT02521103 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Cemented vs Cementless TKA
NCT03683992 COMPLETED
Uncemented Tritanium TKR vs Cemented Triathlon TKR
NCT04040764 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA