Role of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT01563380
Last Updated: 2012-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-31
2011-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Platelet Rich Plasma and Neural Prolotherapy Injections in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT04006314
Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma on Knee Cartilage Injury
NCT03024801
Clinical Study of Pain Reduction by Peri-arthroscopic PRP Application in Knee Degeneration
NCT02189408
Use of Fresh Platelet Rich Plasma With Concentrated Leukocytes or Fresh Platelet Rich Plasma Without Concentrated Leukocytes in the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04187183
Effectiveness of Treatment With Rich Platelet Fibrin (PRF) VS Gold Standard in Patients Undergoing Knee Replacement
NCT04165863
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Demographic data of the patient was recorded. All routine investigations were carried out and the results were noted. Preoperative haemoglobin, range of motion, WOMAC8 scores and KSS9 scores were noted. Standard knee radiographs i.e. weight bearing anteroposterior and lateral views in 30 degree flexion were taken. Patients were randomly allocated to platelet gel group and control group using opaque envelope method which was opened on the day of surgery.
Pain was measured daily using VAS scale which consisted of markings from 1 to 10. Number of tramadol injections given was also noted. Hemoglobin was measured on the day of surgery and postop day 3 by sysmex automated analyser. Postoperative blood loss was also noted by measuring the weight of soaked dressing and converting it into blood volume. Number of blood units transfused was also recorded. Post operative wound dressing was done on day 3 except in case of soakage. Wound was assessed using wound score form. Similar physiotherapy was advised for both the groups. All the patients were advised isometric quadriceps and ankle pumping exercises on postoperative day 0 (POD0). Patients with less pain did the exercises on POD0 only. They were advocated range of motion exercises and straight leg raising on POD1. Patients with decreased pain and who were comfortable were ambulated with help of a walker on POD2. Range of motion was recorded on day 5, 6 weeks and 12 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. WOMAC scores and KSS scores were noted as shown in outcome evaluation.
Statistical analysis The statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, version 15.0 for Windows). All quantitative variables were estimated using measures of central location (mean, median) and measures of dispersion (standard deviation and standard error). Normality of data was checked by measures of skewness and Kolmogorov Smirnov tests of normality. For normally distributed data means were compared using student's t-test for two groups. For more than two groups ANOVA was applied. For Skewed data Mann-Whitney test was applied. Qualitative or categorical variables were described as frequencies and proportions. Proportions were compared using Chi square test. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of different methods was calculated. All statistical tests were two-sided and were performed at a significance level of α=.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PRP arm
Platelet-rich plasma was applied over the wound including the capsule, medial and lateral recesses.
Platelet rich plasma
PRP ready to be injected was supplied in a syringe in a quantity of 8 ml for each knee. The entire procedure was done under complete aseptic precautions. The calcium chloride required for activation was given in a separate syringe in a ratio of 4:1. About 12-16 ml of platelet rich plasma was obtained by this method and it was used for application. To confirm sterility, culture and sensitivity of PRP was performed. Patient's peripheral blood platelet count and the prepared platelet concentrate's platelet count was performed and recorded. Number of tramadol injections given was also noted
Control Arm
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Platelet rich plasma
PRP ready to be injected was supplied in a syringe in a quantity of 8 ml for each knee. The entire procedure was done under complete aseptic precautions. The calcium chloride required for activation was given in a separate syringe in a ratio of 4:1. About 12-16 ml of platelet rich plasma was obtained by this method and it was used for application. To confirm sterility, culture and sensitivity of PRP was performed. Patient's peripheral blood platelet count and the prepared platelet concentrate's platelet count was performed and recorded. Number of tramadol injections given was also noted
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
30 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aditya K Aggarwal
Additional Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aditya K Aggarwal, MS DNB D Ort
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Post graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Post graduate institute of Medical Education & Research
Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
adi_agg_tka_prp-2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.