Evaluation of Papilla Index Around Immediate Mandibular Molar Implants Using Customized Healing Abutment Versus Submerged Healing

NCT ID: NCT04449302

Last Updated: 2020-06-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-30

Study Completion Date

2023-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The original implant treatment protocol recommended that the implant should be placed in a fully healed site and covered with mucosa after placement to ensure osseointegration. The reason was to protect the implant site from bacterial contamination and to avoid loading of the implant. After that, a second stage surgical procedure had to be performed to expose the implant to connect the abutment. However, it was shown that a one stage or non-submerged (NS) approach can lead to successful and predictable outcomes.

Customized healing abutments can be used in the non-submerged protocol, protecting and containing the bone substitute during healing, preserving the alveolar contour, preventing food impaction, and eliminating the need for a second stage surgery and. By means of this technique, critical and subcritical contours can be projected speeding up the peri-implant soft tissue conditioning phase in order to achieve final natural-like restorations.

This randomized controlled trial will compare the clinical and radiographic hard and soft tissue changes using chairside customized healing abutment versus submerged healing following immediate implant placement in mandibular molars through measuring the horizontal ridge changes by CBCT , the crestal bone loss by a standardized digital x-ray and the soft tissue changes by the pink esthetic score (PES).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Immediate implant placement in extraction sockets was used to (i) reduce the number of surgical procedures (ii) preserve the dimensions of the alveolar ridge and (iii) reduce the interval between the removal of the tooth and the insertion of the implant supported restoration.

Flapless extraction is a technique aimed towards leaving the periosteum undisturbed by extracting the tooth with minimal trauma using periotomes without flap reflection. They also found less crestal bone loss around immediate implants placed in flapless extraction sockets in compared to implants placed by elevating a flap, due to greater blood supply and less postoperative swelling and pain.

Submerged healing and absence of loading was proposed during the early stage of osseointegration. Such a two-stage approach, based on a period of submerged healing aimed at optimizing the process of new bone formation and remodeling that follows implant placement is considered the gold standard procedure. It requires a second surgery to connect the abutment. This second surgical procedure is generally a minor one; thus, it is not particularly uncomfortable for the patient and offers the possibility to perform soft tissue management procedures around healed implants which may result in a better long-term prognosis. On the other hand, the desire to provide faster and less invasive treatment to patients, as well as to avoid postponing implant load and prosthesis delivery, has led to one-stage surgery (non-submerged healing). In this approach the implant and the healing abutment are placed in a single procedure so it remains exposed in the oral cavity during the osseointegration period.

The provisional restoration or a custom abutment can act as a "prosthetic socket-sealing" to protect, contain and maintain the blood clot and bone-graft material during the healing phase of treatment.

The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic hard and soft tissue changes using chairside customized healing abutment versus submerged healing following immediate implant placement in mandibular molars.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Immediate Dental Implant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

it is randomized clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
single blinded

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Immediate molar implant with customized healing abutment

Patients will receive an immediate mandibular molar implant with customized healing abutment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Immediate molar implant with customized healing abutment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will receive an immediate implant with customized healing abutment

1. Atraumatic extraction without flap elevation using periotomes and elevators then sectioning of the roots will be performed to preserve the interseptal bone.
2. The drilling will be performed starting from the pilot drill in the interseptal bone to the twisting drills according to the manufacturer's instructions to the selected implant size. The implant is to be placed immediately then the insertion torque will be measured using a torque wrench. In order to place the customized healing abutment, the insertion torque should be more than 25 ncm.
3. The gap distance will be filled by xenograft, a plastic abutment will be screwed in place then a flowable composie resin will be applied around into small amounts and cured to take the soft tissue contour then finishing and polishing of the customized healing abutment will be done.

Immediate molar implant with submerged healing

Patients will receive an immediate mandibular molar implant with submerged healing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Immediate molar implant with customized healing abutment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will receive an immediate implant with customized healing abutment

1. Atraumatic extraction without flap elevation using periotomes and elevators then sectioning of the roots will be performed to preserve the interseptal bone.
2. The drilling will be performed starting from the pilot drill in the interseptal bone to the twisting drills according to the manufacturer's instructions to the selected implant size. The implant is to be placed immediately then the insertion torque will be measured using a torque wrench. In order to place the customized healing abutment, the insertion torque should be more than 25 ncm.
3. The gap distance will be filled by xenograft, a plastic abutment will be screwed in place then a flowable composie resin will be applied around into small amounts and cured to take the soft tissue contour then finishing and polishing of the customized healing abutment will be done.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Immediate molar implant with customized healing abutment

Patients will receive an immediate implant with customized healing abutment

1. Atraumatic extraction without flap elevation using periotomes and elevators then sectioning of the roots will be performed to preserve the interseptal bone.
2. The drilling will be performed starting from the pilot drill in the interseptal bone to the twisting drills according to the manufacturer's instructions to the selected implant size. The implant is to be placed immediately then the insertion torque will be measured using a torque wrench. In order to place the customized healing abutment, the insertion torque should be more than 25 ncm.
3. The gap distance will be filled by xenograft, a plastic abutment will be screwed in place then a flowable composie resin will be applied around into small amounts and cured to take the soft tissue contour then finishing and polishing of the customized healing abutment will be done.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients age between 20 and 70 years old.
* Patients with non-restorable mandibular molars
* Medically free.
* Integrity of the extraction socket wall
* Patients who are able to sign an informed consent form.
* Cooperative, motivated and hygiene conscious Patients.
* Patients who are able to come for the follow up appointments.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with compromised general health conditions that would impair bone healing including: Past or present history of bone irradiation Patients taking bisphosphonates

* Teeth with acute periapical pathosis
* Heavy Smokers
* Parafunctional habits
* Pregnant females
* Drug abusers
* Uncontrolled diabetes
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Nabil Ibrahem

Teaching assistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Omnia Aboul Dahab, Phd

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Cairo University

Hani El-Nahas, Phd

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Cairo University

Omnia K. Tawfik, Phd

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Cairo University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohamed N. Ibrahem, Msc

Role: CONTACT

01004532192 ext. 002

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Perez A, Caiazzo A, Valente NA, Toti P, Alfonsi F, Barone A. Standard vs customized healing abutments with simultaneous bone grafting for tissue changes around immediate implants. 1-year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Feb;22(1):42-53. doi: 10.1111/cid.12871. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31797548 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PER 6-3-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

IMMEDIATE IMPLANT With Different Types of Membranes
NCT06657651 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA