Needlescopic Inversion and Snaring Versus Ligation of Hernia Sac in Girls

NCT ID: NCT04372212

Last Updated: 2020-05-07

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 100 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2020-03-21
• Study Completion Date: 2021-07-31

Brief Summary

Failure of closure of the processus vaginalis during intrauterine life will result in congenital inguinal hernia [CIH]. Exact incidence of CIH in children is not known but it has been reported between 1-5 %. In premature babies, the incidence may reach up to 15-30%. Congenital inguinal hernia is more common in boys than girls, ranging from 4:1 to 10:1 [1].

Although the open inguinal herniotomy and high ligation of the sac is the gold standard line of the treatment, Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair become a good option. The laparoscopy has many advantages that it is simple, feasible, and safe with detection of the contralateral hernia and other hernias. In addition to laparoscopy results in excellent cosmetic results low wound infection, less pain, and short hospital stay.

The non-division of the hernia sac in during laparoscopic hernia repair may be the cause of recurrence and postoperative hydrocele [5]. Division of hernia sac and suturing of proximal part at IIR; is modification of the laparoscopic technique which mimic what happen during open herniotomy. Some authors resected the processus vaginalis and closed the inguinal ring for the repair of CIH. They claimed that they have excellent results with low recurrence.One author described a technique based on the theory that CIH is due to a patent processus vaginalis, and therefore, the procedure should be to entirely resect it, with or without closure of the internal ring. This allows the peritoneal scar tissue to close the area of the ring. Also, this scarring occurs in the extent of the inguinal canal where the dissection took place, therefore causing the same peritoneal scarring and sealing of the inguinal floor with complete resolution of the problem.

However, a few studies address the superiority of technique over the other and to date there is no controlled randomized study to compare needlescopic disconnection of the hernia sac and closure of the peritoneum at IIR versus disconnection without closure of the peritoneum.

Detailed Description

Description of the Procedure:

Instruments: 5-mm trocar and 5-mm 30° telescope, single 2-mm reusable port, two 14-G (1.6-mm) suture grasper devices [SGD] [Mediflex Company, Islandia, New York, USA], Home made isolated diathermy probe and an endoscopic polypectomy snare [SN]. SN is modified by shortening from 2-m to 70-cm. It fits directly in 2-mm port.

Operative details: Patient lies in supine position at upper part of OR table towards right edge. OR table tilted to opposite side of hernia with 30- degree Trendelenburg position. Operator stands on patient's right side during either uni-or bi-lateral hernia. Camera man stands at table head and monitor facing patient's feet.

Povidone Iodine solution was applied from nipple to mid-thigh and child is then draped. Vertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision is made and 5mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min keeping intraabdominal pressure between 8-12 mmHg according to age and weight. Two-mm incision at point (A) located at junction of upper 1/3 and lower 2/3 of line extending between umbilicus and symphysis pubis for 2mm port passed under direct vision. A 1.6-mm 11-blade scalpel puncture 2- cm. above the corresponding Mc-Burney's Point (B) for SGD. Abdomen is explored to confirm the diagnosis and detect bilateral hernia if present.

One SGD was introduced through point A (SGD-A) and another] one through point B (SGD-B). Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac by gradual sustained alternating traction on the round ligament. Each SGD hands to the other one till complete inversion occurs, this is known by the sac hanging from internal ring without retracting-back inside the inguinal canal. At this point, snare (SN) is passed from the trocar at point A in the place of SGD-A and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-B passes inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernia sac, which is then twisted around its neck several time. SN is closed tightly and diathermy current is applied to it leading to separation of hernia sac at the proper neck. [2-4]Detached sac (grasped by SGD-B) is then pushed antigradely out through the umbilical port. Deflation of the abdomen is done and umbilical fascial incision was closed using 2/0 or 3/0 Vicryl and umbilical skin layers were closed using 4/0 Vicryl.

Group B; The above operative details will be applied but the inverted twisted sac will be ligated by a home made 3/0 Vicry suture endoloop befor excision and extraction [5].

Conditions

Congenital Inguinal Hernia; Hernia Sac; Recurrent Hernia; Round Ligament; Injury; Fallopian Tube Injury; Ovarian Injury

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Inversion and Snaring

Vertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision [Point A] is made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min.

Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac. Then, modified polypectomy snare (SN) was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-C passed inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernial sac, which was then twisted around its neck several times. SN was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current was applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) is then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hernia sac inversion and Snaring

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Vertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision [Point A] is made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min.

Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac. Then, modified polypectomy snare (SN) was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-C passed inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernial sac, which was then twisted around its neck several times. SN was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current was applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) is then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port.

Inversion and Ligation

Vertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision [Point A] is made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min.

Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac. Then, modified polypectomy snare (SN) was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-C passed inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernial sac, which was then twisted around its neck several times. SN was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current was applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) is then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hernia sac inversion and Snaring

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Vertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision [Point A] is made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min.

Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac. Then, modified polypectomy snare (SN) was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-C passed inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernial sac, which was then twisted around its neck several times. SN was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current was applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) is then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port.

Interventions

Hernia sac inversion and Snaring

Vertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision [Point A] is made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min.

Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac. Then, modified polypectomy snare (SN) was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-C passed inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernial sac, which was then twisted around its neck several times. SN was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current was applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) is then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port.

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Female patients with congenital inguinal hernia (unilateral or bilateral) Hernia defect less than 1.5 cm. Age: from 6 months to 10 years old

Exclusion Criteria

• Male patients Female patients with recurrent inguinal hernia Females below 6-Month Hernia defect more than 1.5 cm.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 6 Months
• Maximum Eligible Age: 12 Years
• Eligible Sex: FEMALE
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Rafik Shalaby

Professor of Pediatric Surgery

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Rafik Y Shalaby, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Al-Azhar University

Locations

Al-Azhar Faculty of Medicine

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status: RECRUITING

Faculty of Medicine

Tanta, , Egypt

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Egypt

Central Contacts

Rafik Y Shalaby, MD

Role: CONTACT

rafikshalaby40@gmail.com

01000722072

Mohamed I Elsawaf, MD

Role: CONTACT

mohamed_elsawaf@med.tanta.edu.eg

01222530433

Facility Contacts

Rafik Shalaby, MD

Role: primary

rafikshalaby40@gmail.com

01000722072

Mohamed I Elsawaf, MD

Role: primary

mohamed_elsawaf@med.tanta.edu.eg

References

Shalaby RY, Fawy M, Soliman SM, Dorgham A. A new simplified technique for needlescopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Apr;41(4):863-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.042.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 16567212 (View on PubMed)

Wantz GE. Testicular atrophy as a risk inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Apr;154(4):570-1.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 7064092 (View on PubMed)

Niyogi A, Tahim AS, Sherwood WJ, De Caluwe D, Madden NP, Abel RM, Haddad MJ, Clarke SA. A comparative study examining open inguinal herniotomy with and without hernioscopy to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a pediatric population. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 Apr;26(4):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2549-x. Epub 2010 Feb 9.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 20143077 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

PS2020-1001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id