Comparison of Two Different Pain Management Techniques in Pediatric Patients Undergoing a Hernia Repair

NCT ID: NCT01740193

Last Updated: 2018-12-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

59 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to find the best way to decrease pain in children right after surgery whom have had their hernia fixed. Right now, there are two different ways surgeons and anesthesia providers try to decrease pain. It is not clear if one way is better than the other. The method used is often chosen by which one the doctor has more experience using. The Investigator plans to find out if one of the methods is more effective and/or safer than the other method.

The results of this study will help learn how to best control pain in children having surgery for hernia repair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy is a commonly performed surgical procedure in the pediatric population. Multimodal anesthesia consisting of systemic narcotics, surgical wound infiltration with local anesthetic and ilioinguinal and/or iliohypogastric nerve blockade has traditionally been employed to achieve acceptable analgesia. Recently, ultrasound-based studies have demonstrated that blind abdominal wall injections are done with poor accuracy. Ultrasound-guided alternatives, such as the transverses abdominis plane (TAP) block, may improve analgesic efficacy and patient comfort in the post-operative period when compared to blind landmark based nerve blockade. There has been increasing utilization of the TAP block in the adult population due to the described ability to provide effective blockade of the thoracolumbar spinal nerves innervating the abdominal wall. We propose a randomized prospective evaluation of the analgesic efficacy comparing surgeon performed ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block with ultrasound-guided TAP blockade in healthy ASA I and II pediatric patients undergoing unilateral herniorrhaphy on an outpatient basis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Inguinal Hernia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Pain Regional Anesthesia ultrasound transversus abdominis plane herniorrhaphy pediatrics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TAP Block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TAP Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

While the terminal branches of T7 to L1 cannot be visualized under ultrasound as they pass between the internal oblique and the transverse abdominis muscles, they are expected to lie within this plane. The three muscular layers of the abdominal wall, however, can be easily identified under ultrasound guidance. A needle is advanced under ultrasound guidance towards the fascial plane that separates the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles, at which point local anesthetic is deposited under direct visualization.

Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric blockade is performed as an injection after palpation of the anterior superior iliac spine followed be a perceived loss of resistance with insertion of the needle, or may be infiltrated locally following herniorrhaphy exposure as anatomic landmarks can prove to be difficult to locate in the anesthetized pediatric patient.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TAP Block

While the terminal branches of T7 to L1 cannot be visualized under ultrasound as they pass between the internal oblique and the transverse abdominis muscles, they are expected to lie within this plane. The three muscular layers of the abdominal wall, however, can be easily identified under ultrasound guidance. A needle is advanced under ultrasound guidance towards the fascial plane that separates the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles, at which point local anesthetic is deposited under direct visualization.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade

Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric blockade is performed as an injection after palpation of the anterior superior iliac spine followed be a perceived loss of resistance with insertion of the needle, or may be infiltrated locally following herniorrhaphy exposure as anatomic landmarks can prove to be difficult to locate in the anesthetized pediatric patient.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

transversus abdominis plane block

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The subject is male or female;
* The subject is of any racial and ethnic groups;
* The subject is age 12 months to 10 years (inclusive);
* The subject weighs more than 8.0 kg (inclusive of the eighth kilogram);
* The subject is scheduled for the following: Unilateral herniorrhaphy scheduled on an out-patient basis, and not being performed in conjunction with any other surgical procedures;
* The subject is American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) patient classification I-II
* The subject's legally authorized representative has given written informed consent to participate in the study and when appropriate, the subject has given assent or consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria

* Additional surgical procedures are being performed concurrently;
* The subject is ASA classification \> II;
* The subject has pre-existing allergies to local anesthetics;
* The subject receives midazolam as a premedication;
* The subject has an imminent life threatening condition that impacts the ability to obtain informed consent;
* The subject has any other condition, which in the opinion of the principal investigator, would not be suitable for participation in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jamie Furstein, CRNA, DNAP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cincinnati Children's Hosptial Medical Center - Liberty Campus

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Niraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, Wong M. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):601-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep175. Epub 2009 Jun 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19561014 (View on PubMed)

Fredrickson M, Seal P, Houghton J. Early experience with the transversus abdominis plane block in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Sep;18(9):891-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02591.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18768050 (View on PubMed)

Aveline C, Le Hetet H, Le Roux A, Vautier P, Cognet F, Vinet E, Tison C, Bonnet F. Comparison between ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane and conventional ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for day-case open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;106(3):380-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq363. Epub 2010 Dec 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21177284 (View on PubMed)

Fredrickson MJ, Seal P. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for neonatal abdominal surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 May;37(3):469-72. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0903700303.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19499870 (View on PubMed)

Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr, Patel MK, Wilkins LJ, Mehta SA, Lumb PD. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 1998 Feb;86(2):235-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199802000-00003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9459225 (View on PubMed)

Hadzic A, New York School of Regional Anesthesia.: Textbook of regional anesthesia and acute pain management. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division; 2007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-1778

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id