Day Case Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children. Is Laparoscopic Approach Justified?

NCT ID: NCT00597194

Last Updated: 2008-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

89 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-10-31

Study Completion Date

2007-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We compare laparoscopic and classic open operation for inguinal hernia in children. Attention is focused on the recovery, surgical result and the duration of the operation and hospital stay.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and objective : In adults the advantages laparoscopic inguinal hernia are less pain, shorter recovery, shorter sick leave and better cosmetic result. It is not known whether laparoscopic hernia repair produces similar results in children.The objective is to compare the duration of recovery, postoperative pain and long-term surgical results between day case laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair in children.

Key inclusion criteria: Children included in the study must be aged four months to sixteen years of age and not have undergone any previous surgery. Of male patients those with completely descended testes are accepted.

Study type: The study is randomized, single-blinded prospective comparison between laparoscopic and open day case inguinal hernia repair in children.

Target sample size: For the assumption that there is a difference of one day in time to restore normal activities after laparoscopic and open hernia repair, target sample size of 100 patients in the laparoscopic and 100 in open repair arm should reach 90% power with p \< 0.05.

Recruitment status : From 10/ 2002 to 1/2007 89 patients (laparoscopic repair LH 47, open repair OH 42) are recruited. Primary outcome: The time to restore normal activity after surgery . Secondary Outcomes : The degree of postoperative pain, the duration of the operation, sick leave of parents, surgical result 6 months and 2 years after the repair.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inguinal Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OH

Inguinal hernia operated using a classic open herniotomy(OH)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hernia repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hernia repair laparoscopically (LH) or by open operation (OH)

LH

Laparoscopic herniorraphy (LH) for inguinal hernia

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hernia repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hernia repair laparoscopically (LH) or by open operation (OH)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hernia repair

Hernia repair laparoscopically (LH) or by open operation (OH)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* unilateral inguinal hernia
* age age \> 4 months, \<16 years
* fully descended testes
* study consent signed

Exclusion Criteria

* previous abdominal or inguinal surgery
* testes not fully descended
* not healthy enough for day surgery
* age \< 4months or \>16 years
* study consent not signed
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Finland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Helsinki, Finland

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antti I Koivusalo, MDPhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital for Children and Adolescents,Helsinki,Finland

Mikko P Pakarinen, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital for Children and Adolescents,Helsinki,Finland

Risto J Rintala, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital for Children and Adolescents,Helsinki,Finland

Christer Holmberg, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital for Children and Adolescents,Helsinki,Finland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital for Children and Adolescents

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Butler RE, Burke R, Schneider JJ, Brar H, Lucha PA Jr. The economic impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: results of a double-blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2007 Mar;21(3):387-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9123-6. Epub 2007 Jan 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17235721 (View on PubMed)

Eklund A, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Enander LK, Leijonmarck CE, Osterberg J, Montgomery A. Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2006 Sep;93(9):1060-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5405.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16862612 (View on PubMed)

Schier F. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-a prospective personal series of 542 children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Jun;41(6):1081-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.02.028.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16769338 (View on PubMed)

Koivusalo AI, Korpela R, Wirtavuori K, Piiparinen S, Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP. A single-blinded, randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open hernia repair in children. Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):332-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3752.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19117900 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

T 1040L0007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

216L2002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Repair of Inguinal Hernia
NCT06514859 RECRUITING NA