Day Case Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children. Is Laparoscopic Approach Justified?
NCT ID: NCT00597194
Last Updated: 2008-01-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
89 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2002-10-31
2007-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Open and Laparoscopic Hernia Repair. A Comparative Study
NCT05011786
Outcome of Laparoscopic Inguinal Herniorraphy in Children
NCT02310958
Laparoscopic Hernia Repair With Lateral Umbilicus Ligament for Children
NCT01377181
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Infancy and Childhood
NCT02239185
Comparison of Laparoscopic Herniotomy and Open Herniotomy in Children
NCT06356987
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Key inclusion criteria: Children included in the study must be aged four months to sixteen years of age and not have undergone any previous surgery. Of male patients those with completely descended testes are accepted.
Study type: The study is randomized, single-blinded prospective comparison between laparoscopic and open day case inguinal hernia repair in children.
Target sample size: For the assumption that there is a difference of one day in time to restore normal activities after laparoscopic and open hernia repair, target sample size of 100 patients in the laparoscopic and 100 in open repair arm should reach 90% power with p \< 0.05.
Recruitment status : From 10/ 2002 to 1/2007 89 patients (laparoscopic repair LH 47, open repair OH 42) are recruited. Primary outcome: The time to restore normal activity after surgery . Secondary Outcomes : The degree of postoperative pain, the duration of the operation, sick leave of parents, surgical result 6 months and 2 years after the repair.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
OH
Inguinal hernia operated using a classic open herniotomy(OH)
Hernia repair
Hernia repair laparoscopically (LH) or by open operation (OH)
LH
Laparoscopic herniorraphy (LH) for inguinal hernia
Hernia repair
Hernia repair laparoscopically (LH) or by open operation (OH)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hernia repair
Hernia repair laparoscopically (LH) or by open operation (OH)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age age \> 4 months, \<16 years
* fully descended testes
* study consent signed
Exclusion Criteria
* testes not fully descended
* not healthy enough for day surgery
* age \< 4months or \>16 years
* study consent not signed
4 Months
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Finland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Helsinki, Finland
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antti I Koivusalo, MDPhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital for Children and Adolescents,Helsinki,Finland
Mikko P Pakarinen, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital for Children and Adolescents,Helsinki,Finland
Risto J Rintala, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital for Children and Adolescents,Helsinki,Finland
Christer Holmberg, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hospital for Children and Adolescents,Helsinki,Finland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital for Children and Adolescents
Helsinki, , Finland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Butler RE, Burke R, Schneider JJ, Brar H, Lucha PA Jr. The economic impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: results of a double-blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2007 Mar;21(3):387-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9123-6. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
Eklund A, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Enander LK, Leijonmarck CE, Osterberg J, Montgomery A. Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2006 Sep;93(9):1060-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5405.
Schier F. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-a prospective personal series of 542 children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Jun;41(6):1081-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.02.028.
Koivusalo AI, Korpela R, Wirtavuori K, Piiparinen S, Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP. A single-blinded, randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open hernia repair in children. Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):332-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3752.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
T 1040L0007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
216L2002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.