Stool DNA to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Alaska Native People
NCT ID: NCT04336397
Last Updated: 2025-11-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2029 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-29
2024-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Evaluation of a Multi-target Stool DNA (Mt-sDNA) Test, Cologuard, for CRC Screening in Individuals Aged 45-49 and at Average Risk for Development of Colorectal Cancer: Act Now
NCT03728348
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native Men
NCT06436300
Voyage: Real-World Impact of the Multi-target Stool DNA Test on CRC Screening and Mortality
NCT04124406
Enhancing Prevention Pathways Toward Tribal Colorectal Health
NCT02882620
Interventions to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT00692211
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. High Intensity Intervention: Participants will receive navigated tribal health worker outreach, a mailed MT-sDNA kit, mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and follow-up reminders
2. Medium Intensity Intervention: Participants will receive mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available, including MT-sDNA, and navigated follow-up outreach reminders
3. Usual Care (Control arm): All other communities in the participating Tribal health region will serve as the reference group receiving usual care (i.e., screening recommendation at a clinic visit) Participants receiving the high intensity intervention are expected to have a 20% increase in screening uptake while those receiving medium intensity intervention will have a 10% increase in screening uptake over those receiving usual care. The study will also measure MT-sDNA sample quality and neoplastic yield in these remote Alaska Native communities. The investigators anticipate that the proportion of MT-sDNA tests meeting quality control standards will be the same as in the general US population (96%) and that pre-cancerous polyp detection rates at diagnostic post-MT-sDNA colonoscopy will exceed routine clinical practice rates in the general US population (52%-67%).
During and following the graded intensity intervention, the investigators will survey samples of patients to evaluate their awareness and response to the CRC screening intervention. The investigators will assess their perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy relevant to CRC screening as well as measure the time-to-respond and screening method used. The study will use focus groups and key informant interviews to learn about factors associated with screening response. For the focus groups, AN people ages 45-75 who are unscreened or non-adherent to screening guidelines (colonoscopy within 10 years, sigmoidoscopy within five years, or fecal occult blood testing within preceding 12 months) will be invited to provide their views on barriers to and facilitators of screening, including barriers described in the literature and identified in the investigators previous work. Non-adherence will be identified through tribal medical records. Each focus group will last up to two hours, and will include 6-8 participants. All focus groups will be stratified by gender, and focus groups will be balanced so that approximately equal numbers of men and women are included in the analysis.
The investigators will also conduct a brief survey and key informant interviews (6-8 clinician interviews at each location) among community health aides, providers, and tribal health system administrators using validated measures of intervention feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness to characterize provider- and system-level barriers and promotors to MT-sDNA implementation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High Intensity
Navigated tribal health worker telephone outreach up to 5 telephone calls and 1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
Multi-target stool DNA test
Cluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care
Colonoscopy
Cluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care
Medium Intensity
1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and 1 telephone call from a tribal health worker. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
Multi-target stool DNA test
Cluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care
Colonoscopy
Cluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care
Usual Care
usual care (i.e., opportunistic screening recommendation at a clinic visit)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multi-target stool DNA test
Cluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care
Colonoscopy
Cluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Active health system users with at least one Alaska Tribal Health System visit in the previous three years
* Due for colorectal cancer screening (have not had colonoscopy in past 10 years or fecal occult blood test in past 1 year or flexible sigmoidoscopy in past 5 years)
Exclusion Criteria
* History of familial adenomatous polyposis
* Hereditary non-polyposis CRC
* Previous colonoscopic evidence of inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, colorectal adenomas, or CRC
* Known history of colectomy
45 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation
OTHER
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Diana Redwood, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation
Bethel, Alaska, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.