Study of In-home Tests for Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01998009

Last Updated: 2015-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1382 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-05-31

Study Completion Date

2014-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to compare the performance characteristics or accuracy of different in-home screening tests for colorectal cancer (fecal occult blood tests), among patients without symptoms of colorectal cancer. Patients who meet study eligibility criteria and agree to participate in the study are asked to perform one guaiac and two immunochemical fecal occult blood tests at home prior to their colonoscopy. After the patient has completed and sent in the test kits, the patient then undergoes their previously scheduled colonoscopy. Accuracy and performance characteristics for each type of fecal occult blood test, including sensitivity, specificity, test positivity rate and positive predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia (advanced colorectal polyps) or colorectal cancer, will be estimated by comparing the fecal occult blood test results with the results of the colonoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One of the recommended options for colorectal cancer screening in the population at average risk for colorectal cancer is annual fecal occult blood test (FOBT) starting at age 50. Randomized controlled trials have shown that annual or biennial fecal occult blood testing using a guaiac-based test reduces incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the guaiac-based tests is relatively low. Guaiac-based fecal tests can produce false-positive or false-negative results with certain foods, vitamins, or medications, so dietary restrictions are generally recommended before the test. Newer, immunochemical FOBTs use antibodies to detect the globin portion of human hemoglobin and do not require dietary restrictions. These immunochemical tests may have improved performance characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) compared with the guaiac-based tests. However, there have been few studies of the performance characteristics of the immunochemical tests in the average-risk population, particularly for the iFOBTs that are currently available in the U.S. There are several iFOBT tests on the U.S. market which may have different performance characteristics.

Some of the newer immunochemical tests also have the advantage of having a simpler sampling procedure for the patient. Guaiac-based FOBTs generally use sticks or spatulas to collect specimens from three stools that have not contacted toilet bowl water; these specimens are then smeared on test cards. However, some immunochemical tests allow sample collection by brushing the surface of the stool while it is in the toilet bowl water. In addition, some immunochemical tests only require samples from one or two stools.

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Key policy groups including the ACS, the American College of Radiology, the U.S. Multi-society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommend the FOBT (guaiac or immunochemical-based) as one of several appropriate screening strategies for colorectal cancer. Although colonoscopy has higher sensitivity and specificity than FOBT in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia, colonoscopy is an invasive test that has several potential disadvantages when screening the average-risk population, including higher costs, capacity limitations, and increased risk of complications. Immunochemical FOBT may have some advantages over both guaiac-based FOBT and colonoscopy for screening the average-risk population, including better performance characteristics and better patient acceptability than gFOBT and lower costs than colonoscopy. Unfortunately, the scientific literature on the sensitivity and specificity of the respective tests is not sufficient to support more specific recommendations about which test is best for routine screening among asymptomatic adults. This study will address that crucial gap in the literature.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fecal occult blood tests

Each patient will perform one guaiac and two immunochemical fecal occult blood tests at home.

Group Type OTHER

fecal occult blood tests

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fecal occult blood tests

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 50 - 75 years of age
* Scheduled to have a colonoscopy for screening or as a routine exam
* Has not had more than one episode of rectal bleeding in the last 6 months
* Does not have a personal history of colorectal cancer or colorectal polyps
* Has not had a positive FOBT in the 12 months prior to study enrollment
* Has not had a colonoscopy within the past 5 years
* Has not had a prior colon resection or colon or rectal surgery
* Does not have a history of inflammatory bowel disease (e.g. ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease)
* Does not have a personal or family history of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)
* Not currently taking anticoagulant medication such as Coumadin, Warfarin, Heparin, or Plavix
* Able to read English
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Battelle Memorial Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Minnesota

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Park Nicollet Health Services

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CDC-NCCDPHP-5985

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.