Trial Outcomes & Findings for Stool DNA to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Alaska Native People (NCT NCT04336397)
NCT ID: NCT04336397
Last Updated: 2025-11-19
Results Overview
Incident CRC screening episode defined as having at least one of the following within 1 year of follow-up after randomization and intervention: colonoscopy; MT-sDNA with a negative result; or MT-sDNA with a positive result followed by a colonoscopy within 1 year.
COMPLETED
NA
2029 participants
1 year
2025-11-19
Participant Flow
Unit of analysis: Community
Participant milestones
| Measure |
High Intensity
Navigated tribal health worker telephone outreach up to 5 telephone calls and 1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
|
Medium Intensity
1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and 1 telephone call from a tribal health worker. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
|
Usual Care
Usual care (i.e., opportunistic screening recommendation at a clinic visit)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
746 16
|
696 16
|
587 14
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
746 16
|
696 16
|
587 14
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
High Intensity
n=746 Participants
Navigated tribal health worker telephone outreach up to 5 telephone calls and 1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
|
Medium Intensity
n=696 Participants
1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and 1 telephone call from a tribal health worker. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
|
Usual Care
n=587 Participants
Usual care (i.e., opportunistic screening recommendation at a clinic visit)
|
Total
n=2029 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
45-54
|
338 Participants
n=746 Participants
|
321 Participants
n=696 Participants
|
311 Participants
n=587 Participants
|
970 Participants
n=2029 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
55-64
|
267 Participants
n=746 Participants
|
242 Participants
n=696 Participants
|
178 Participants
n=587 Participants
|
687 Participants
n=2029 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
65-75
|
141 Participants
n=746 Participants
|
133 Participants
n=696 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=587 Participants
|
372 Participants
n=2029 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
303 Participants
n=746 Participants
|
274 Participants
n=696 Participants
|
239 Participants
n=587 Participants
|
816 Participants
n=2029 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
443 Participants
n=746 Participants
|
422 Participants
n=696 Participants
|
348 Participants
n=587 Participants
|
1213 Participants
n=2029 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Alaska Native
|
746 Participants
n=746 Participants
|
696 Participants
n=696 Participants
|
587 Participants
n=587 Participants
|
2029 Participants
n=2029 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
746 participants
n=746 Participants
|
696 participants
n=696 Participants
|
587 participants
n=587 Participants
|
2029 participants
n=2029 Participants
|
|
CRC screening test requested
MT-sDNA
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
|
CRC screening test requested
Colonoscopy
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
|
CRC screening test requested
Unable to contact/Refused
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
0 Participants
At baseline, no participants had chosen a colorectal cancer screening test.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearIncident CRC screening episode defined as having at least one of the following within 1 year of follow-up after randomization and intervention: colonoscopy; MT-sDNA with a negative result; or MT-sDNA with a positive result followed by a colonoscopy within 1 year.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
High Intensity
n=746 Participants
Navigated tribal health worker telephone outreach up to 5 telephone calls and 1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
|
Medium Intensity
n=696 Participants
1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and 1 telephone call from a tribal health worker. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
|
Usual Care
n=587 Participants
Usual care (i.e., opportunistic screening recommendation at a clinic visit)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Colorectal Cancer Screening by Study Arm
|
205 Participants
|
165 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearTest requested (MT-sDNA or colonoscopy) by intervention participants
Outcome measures
| Measure |
High Intensity
n=539 Participants
Navigated tribal health worker telephone outreach up to 5 telephone calls and 1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
|
Medium Intensity
n=410 Participants
1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and 1 telephone call from a tribal health worker. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
|
Usual Care
Usual care (i.e., opportunistic screening recommendation at a clinic visit)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Test Requested (MT-sDNA or Colonoscopy)
MT-sDNA
|
384 Participants
|
277 Participants
|
—
|
|
Test Requested (MT-sDNA or Colonoscopy)
Colonoscopy
|
155 Participants
|
133 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: This measure only includes participants who had an abnormal MT-sDNA test in either the high- and medium-intensity intervention arms and whether they received a follow-up colonoscopy. Usual care arm was not offered MT-sDNA and so is not included in this secondary outcome measure.
Rate of positive MT-sDNA test follow up to diagnostic colonoscopy
Outcome measures
| Measure |
High Intensity
n=37 Participants
Navigated tribal health worker telephone outreach up to 5 telephone calls and 1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
|
Medium Intensity
n=20 Participants
1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and 1 telephone call from a tribal health worker. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
|
Usual Care
Usual care (i.e., opportunistic screening recommendation at a clinic visit)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
MT-sDNA Diagnostic Follow-up
|
29 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
Adverse Events
High Intensity
Medium Intensity
Usual Care
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Diana Redwood
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place