Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
231 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-03-01
2022-01-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
IVM Versus IVF in High Antral Follicle Count Patients
NCT03405701
Health of Frozen Transferred Versus Fresh Transferred Children
NCT04099784
Development of IVF/ICSI Children Born From Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols
NCT05502770
New Application of Sequential in Vitro Muturation System for Infertility Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
NCT03773263
Children Born From IVM-CAPA vs IVF or Natural Conception
NCT04048486
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Regarding technique, immature oocytes (germinal vesicle - GV) were aspirated from secondary follicles sized from 2-10mm, under follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) priming or no ovarian stimulation at all. Afterward, the maturation process was undertaken in an artificial medium, out of a living body. This technique, by reducing the usage of external hormones, is highly effective in minimizing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in women with high antral follicle count, especially polycystic ovarian syndrome, with a rate of OHSS recorded as low as 0 percent. Alongside that, the pregnancy rate, as well as the live birth rate of IVM, when proceeded well, is not lower than conventional IVF. Until now, there is only one randomized controlled trial comparing these two techniques directly.
Due to differences in the process of culturing between IVM and IVF, primarily the maturation is undertaken in an artificial medium, the health of children born from IVM received many interests. Numerous studies have been conducted to compare the development of children born from IVM and IVF. Neonatal outcomes of children born from IVM and IVF are considerably comparable. And the development of children born from these two techniques is not significantly different. All the information, as mentioned above, was not from randomized controlled trials but retrospective or prospective cohort studies. Thus, we conduct a follow up of our RCT to investigate the development of children born from IVM and IVM, to give strong evidence about the safety of IVM in women with high antral follicle count or especially PCOS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IVF children
Children born from in-vitro fertilization
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy-to-use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
Physical development and General Health
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires
IVM children
Children born from in-vitro maturation
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy-to-use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
Physical development and General Health
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy-to-use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
Physical development and General Health
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Parents agree to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
6 Months
24 Months
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mỹ Đức Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lan N Vuong, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mỹ Đức Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mỹ Đức Hospital
Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vuong LN, Ho VNA, Ho TM, Dang VQ, Phung TH, Giang NH, Le AH, Pham TD, Wang R, Norman RJ, Smitz J, Gilchrist RB, Mol BW. Effectiveness and safety of in vitro maturation of oocytes versus in vitro fertilisation in women with high antral follicle count: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 9;8(12):e023413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023413.
Cha KY, Koo JJ, Ko JJ, Choi DH, Han SY, Yoon TK. Pregnancy after in vitro fertilization of human follicular oocytes collected from nonstimulated cycles, their culture in vitro and their transfer in a donor oocyte program. Fertil Steril. 1991 Jan;55(1):109-13. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54068-0.
Das M, Son WY, Buckett W, Tulandi T, Holzer H. In-vitro maturation versus IVF with GnRH antagonist for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: treatment outcome and rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Nov;29(5):545-51. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.07.019. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
Gremeau AS, Andreadis N, Fatum M, Craig J, Turner K, McVeigh E, Child T. In vitro maturation or in vitro fertilization for women with polycystic ovaries? A case-control study of 194 treatment cycles. Fertil Steril. 2012 Aug;98(2):355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.046. Epub 2012 May 31.
Ho VNA, Braam SC, Pham TD, Mol BW, Vuong LN. The effectiveness and safety of in vitro maturation of oocytes versus in vitro fertilization in women with a high antral follicle count. Hum Reprod. 2019 Jun 4;34(6):1055-1064. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez060.
Mostinckx L, Segers I, Belva F, Buyl R, Santos-Ribeiro S, Blockeel C, Smitz J, Anckaert E, Tournaye H, De Vos M. Obstetric and neonatal outcome of ART in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: IVM of oocytes versus controlled ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod. 2019 Aug 1;34(8):1595-1607. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez086.
Roesner S, von Wolff M, Elsaesser M, Roesner K, Reuner G, Pietz J, Bruckner T, Strowitzki T. Two-year development of children conceived by IVM: a prospective controlled single-blinded study. Hum Reprod. 2017 Jun 1;32(6):1341-1350. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex068.
Sauerbrun-Cutler MT, Vega M, Keltz M, McGovern PG. In vitro maturation and its role in clinical assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015 Jan;70(1):45-57. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000150.
Shu-Chi M, Jiann-Loung H, Yu-Hung L, Tseng-Chen S, Ming-I L, Tsu-Fuh Y. Growth and development of children conceived by in-vitro maturation of human oocytes. Early Hum Dev. 2006 Oct;82(10):677-82. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.01.012. Epub 2006 May 11.
Yu EJ, Yoon TK, Lee WS, Park EA, Heo JY, Ko YK, Kim J. Obstetrical, neonatal, and long-term outcomes of children conceived from in vitro matured oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2019 Oct;112(4):691-699. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.034. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
Vuong LN, Nguyen MHN, Nguyen NA, Ly TT, Tran VTT, Nguyen NT, Hoang HLT, Le XTH, Pham TD, Smitz JEJ, Mol BW, Norman RJ, Ho TM. Development of children born from IVM versus IVF: 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2022 Jul 30;37(8):1871-1879. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac115.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CS/BVMĐ/20/05
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.