Children Born From IVM-CAPA vs IVF or Natural Conception
NCT ID: NCT04048486
Last Updated: 2020-10-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
66 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-08-07
2019-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CAPA - IVM in Ovulatory Infertile Women
NCT06744881
CAPA-IVM Culture With Low Oxygen Tension
NCT06367985
Development of IVF/ICSI Children Born From Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols
NCT05502770
Embryo Developmental Potential in a Novel 2-step IVM System
NCT04285892
Amphiregulin Versus Non-Amphiregulin Supplementation to Maturation Culturing Medium in IVM.
NCT03915054
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
During the last two decades, many studies have shown that children born following assisted reproductive techniques (ART) have an increased risk of adverse obstetric, perinatal and short-term follow-up outcomes when compared to naturally conceived (NC) infants (Jackson RA 2004, Helmerhorst et al., 2004; Pinborg et al., 2013; Adams et al., 2015). The etiologies of this association are mainly related to higher proportion of multiple pregnancies due to double embryo transfer option and greater rate of unfavorable comorbidities of infertile women (older age, high BMI, diabetes…). But with the trend toward single embryo transfer in current IVF practice, there are existing evidences supporting that the perinatal risks of singleton gestations following IVF treatment are still higher than those that result from a spontaneous conception (McDonald et al., 2009; Pandey et al., 2012).
Long-term development of children born by ART is also a concerned issue. It is evident that children born as a result of IVF treatment have an excess rate of congenital abnormalities, higher risk of developing metabolic, cardiovascular disorders and subclinical hyperthyroidism in later life (Roger Hart and Robert J. Norman, 2013, part I). Regarding mental health and development outcomes, cerebral palsy and slight neurodevelopmental delay are potential long-term associations with ART (Roger Hart and Robert J. Norman, 2013, part II). However, these adverse outcomes can be explained by obstetric factors (higher rate of prematurity and intrauterine growth restriction) rather than IVF. This leads to the concern about research biases in studies of long-term development of children born by ART where multiple gestations, prematurity, neonatal hospitalization and growth restriction were not well-controlled. Another concern about long-term follow-up studies of IVF children is the limitation of literatures and high-quality clinical trials that investigate the general health outcomes of children born by ART. The majority of valuable data only exist on the short-term outcome of infants born as a result of IVF treatment (Kalra and Barnhart, 2011) even though it is possible that some suspected disorders might only be identifiable beyond the first year of life (Oliver et al., 2012).
When studying about the long-term development of children following ART, a very important factor need to be considered is the medium of culture. There have been existing theories that proposed the mechanism of how epigenetic environment can up or down-regulate a set of genes which then results in the changes in embryonic growth or even the long-term development of children in later stage of life. Different ART methods may cause possible changes in DNA methylation patterns which in turn affect development of the placenta and fetus. This is the "developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis" (DOHaD) explaning why exposure to an adverse environment (possibly the culture medium) may result in unfavorable development and illnesses profiles in the ART offspring (Barker, 2007).
CAPA-IVM is a new promising IVM technique involving the use of a new compound to facilitate the oocyte and embryo competence. CAPA-IVM preserved the maintenance of trans-zonal projections and significantly improved maturation rate and blastocyst yield. NGS analysis of 20 good quality CAPA-IVM blastocysts did not reveal increased aneuploidy compared to age matched routine ICSI patients. The first CAPA-IVM baby was born in 2017 at My Duc Hospital, Vietnam and up to now, there are 33 babies born from this technique. There is no study to investigate the development of babies born from CAPA-IVM.
The investigators therefore conduct this study to investigate the physical and mental development of babies born from CAPA-IVM, IVF or natural conception.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CAPA-IVM
Live babies born from CAPA-IVM
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy-to-use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
Physical development and General Health
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires
IVF/ICSI
Live babies born from IVF/ICSI
No interventions assigned to this group
Natural conception
Live babies born from natural conception
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy-to-use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
Physical development and General Health
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3
Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy-to-use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
Physical development and General Health
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Live babies born from IVF
* Live babies born from natural conception
* Parents agree to participate
Exclusion Criteria
* Babies born from sperm donation cycles
* Babies born from PGT cycles
1 Month
66 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mỹ Đức Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lan N Vuong, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mỹ Đức Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mỹ Đức Hospital
Ho Chi Minh City, Tan Binh, Vietnam
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stephens SM, Arnett DM, Meacham RB. The use of in vitro fertilization in the management of male infertility: what the urologist needs to know. Rev Urol. 2013;15(4):154-60.
Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2004 Jan 31;328(7434):261. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37957.560278.EE. Epub 2004 Jan 23.
Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft A, Aittomaki K, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Nygren KG, Hazekamp J, Bergh C. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):87-104. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms044. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Murphy KE, Beyene J, Ohlsson A; Knowledge Synthesis Group. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Oct;146(2):138-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.035. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):485-503. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms018. Epub 2012 May 19.
Hart R, Norman RJ. The longer-term health outcomes for children born as a result of IVF treatment: Part I--General health outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 May-Jun;19(3):232-43. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms062. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
Hart R, Norman RJ. The longer-term health outcomes for children born as a result of IVF treatment. Part II--Mental health and development outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 May-Jun;19(3):244-50. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt002. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
Kalra SK, Barnhart KT. In vitro fertilization and adverse childhood outcomes: what we know, where we are going, and how we will get there. A glimpse into what lies behind and beckons ahead. Fertil Steril. 2011 May;95(6):1887-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.044. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
Oliver VF, Miles HL, Cutfield WS, Hofman PL, Ludgate JL, Morison IM. Defects in imprinting and genome-wide DNA methylation are not common in the in vitro fertilization population. Fertil Steril. 2012 Jan;97(1):147-53.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.027. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
Barker DJ. The origins of the developmental origins theory. J Intern Med. 2007 May;261(5):412-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01809.x.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Adams: A meta-analysis of neonatal health outcomes
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CS/BVMĐ/19/07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.