IVM Versus IVF: Differences in Patients' Emotional Adjustment and Quality of Life
NCT ID: NCT03066349
Last Updated: 2023-04-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
149 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-08-01
2023-04-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To facilitate the application of IVM as a treatment that can potentially improve the overall patient experience, a study comparing the psychological impact of a conventional ovarian stimulation protocol versus an IVM protocol will be conducted; furthermore, a study investigating the differences in quality of life between the two subgroups will also be performed.
Socio-demographic data, medical characteristics and the following questionnaires will be collected: Specific questions for patients with fertility problems (FertiQol); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) and an instrument to measure side effects designed by the research group. The study group (IVF patients and IVM patients) will be evaluated at three predefined time points: at intake, after oocyte collection and when the outcome after the first embryo transfer is known.
Descriptive analysis, intergroup comparisons and explanatory/predictive model of the dependent variables (quality of life, emotional adjustment) will be performed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Intervention on Psychosocial Health in Women With Unsuccessful IVF Experience
NCT06426472
Working IVF Patients' Quality of Life
NCT04966091
In Vitro Maturation of Human Eggs
NCT06633120
IVM Survey Among Reproductive Medicine Specialists
NCT04488211
Cleavage-stage Versus Blastocyst-stage Embryo Transfer in IVF Patients With Few Embryos
NCT06746129
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with PCOS undergoing conventional ovarian stimulation
Questionnaires
FertiQoL and HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) questionnaires
Patients with PCOS undergoing IVM
Questionnaires
FertiQoL and HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) questionnaires
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaires
FertiQoL and HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) questionnaires
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with polycystic ovarian morphology (12 or more small follicles observed during a baseline pelvic ultrasound scan) or polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (Rotterdam criteria, 2003)
Exclusion Criteria
* High (\>grade 2) grade endometriosis
* Patients who have previously undergone ART treatment
* Patients who require ART with PGD
* In vitro fertilisation with sperm retrieved through testicular biopsy
* Singles without a partner
* Couples who because of the language barrier (poor knowledge of Dutch, French or English) cannot reliably fill out the questionnaire.
18 Years
36 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
OTHER
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michel De Vos
Kliniekhoofd en Klinisch Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michel De Vos
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UZ Brussel - VUB
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Brussels, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EMAQOL_2017
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.