Screening of Colorectal Cancer in the Public Healthcare Sector in Argentina
NCT ID: NCT04293315
Last Updated: 2020-03-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
1520 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-09
2020-03-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Population: people leaving in the catchment area of 10 selected primary care clinics from the public health system in the province of Mendoza, Argentina.
Design and methods: a Randomized clinical study by clusters. 10 PCCs will be included: 5 will be randomly assigned to receive an intervention to increase the CRC screening rates (improvement cycles) and 5 to the control arm (usual care). 150 participants will be included in each PCCs, in total, 1500 participants.
Intervention: An innovative vision is proposed, which combines a participatory and dynamic methodology based on improvement cycles. This approach includes the implementation of participatory learning sessions for health providers, involving the effectors of the design of the intervention. In the intervention branch at least 3 workshops (sessions) will be held with the members of the care system, in order to identify opportunities for improvement oriented to the design and application of an innovative intervention based on best practices. Each one of the sessions will constitute an analysis of the improvement cycle, following the following steps: 1) Selection of participants of the initial workshop; 2) Development of work model based on bibliographic review and initial qualitative phase; 3) Initial workshop with effectors for training in continuous improvement, objectives, interventions and data collection; 4) Learning workshops to discuss results, applicability of interventions and modifications to the work plan; 5) Closing session to evaluate preliminary results and discuss continuity of interventions beyond the project.
Outcomes: 1) Percentage of the population at risk that completes the screening; 2) Percentage of the population classified as at habitual risk or increased by risk factors.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Systems Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening
NCT01299493
Cancer Screening; Access; Awareness; Navigation
NCT04131946
Rural Indiana Screening for Colorectal Cancer
NCT06133439
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening for Diverse Hispanics in Urban Primary Care
NCT01569620
Impact of Training Patient-centered Approach on Shared Decision in Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT06074536
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Process Model: CFIR Theory of Change: COM-B Evaluation Framework: RE-AIM
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
This is the usual care arm. Healthcare workers will provide people with the Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) and information about risk to develop CRC and the importance of early detection.
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention
The same as the Control Arm plus the primary care team of the PCCs will be trained and participate in 8 improvement cycles.
Improvement Cycles
This is a multi-component intervention following the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI)'s Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement by implementing "plan-do-study-act" (PDSA) improvement cycles. The investigators will conduct 8 participative learning sessions for the primary care team. These sessions will be aimed at identifying opportunities for improvement oriented to the design and application of innovative approaches based on best practices.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Improvement Cycles
This is a multi-component intervention following the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI)'s Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement by implementing "plan-do-study-act" (PDSA) improvement cycles. The investigators will conduct 8 participative learning sessions for the primary care team. These sessions will be aimed at identifying opportunities for improvement oriented to the design and application of innovative approaches based on best practices.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 50 and 75 years old
* Residence in the catchment area of the PCCs
* With an indication to perform screening for CRC with FOBT
* People who consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria
* People who plan to move in the next 3 months.
50 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Inter-American Development Bank
OTHER
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vilma Irazola
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ministry of Health
Mendoza, , Argentina
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Irazola V, Santero M, Sanchez M, Tristao I, Ruiz JI, Spira C, Ismael J, Cavallo AS, Gutierrez L, Mazzaresi Y, Nadal AM, Garcia Elorrio E; CCR Trial development group. Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jun;12(2):e002158. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002158.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BID CCR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.