Comparing the Effects of Mobilization With Movement (MWM), Self MWM, and Dynamic Stretching on Hip Internal Rotation)
NCT ID: NCT04279756
Last Updated: 2021-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-17
2020-04-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Examining the Effects of a Mobilization With Movement and a Dynamic Stretch With Over Pressure on Hip Flexion.
NCT04762212
Effect of Mobilization With Movement on Weight Bearing Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion
NCT05844072
The Effect High Velocity Low Amplitude Hip Mobilization on Strength in Subjects With Lower Extremity Pathology
NCT03115879
Comparative Effects of Lower Body Quadrant Neural Mobilization and Stretching in Collegiate Football Players
NCT06298851
Effect of Mobilization in Conjunction With Exercise in Participants With a History of Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT03428620
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objectives of the study are to quantify the effects of two different modalities of hip mobilization with movement and dynamic stretching in terms of hip internal rotation increases, and to inform current physical therapy practice by filling gaps in the literature surrounding the therapeutic effects of hip mobilization with movement. This study is intended to better equip physical therapists to select the most appropriate evidence-based interventions, thereby increasing the quality of patient care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mildly Impaired Group
This group is with participants with mildly impaired hip internal range of motion, from 25-30 degrees.
Hip Mobilization with Movement, Self-Mobilization with Movement, Dynamic Stretch
Participants receive either a therapist performed mobilization with movement, a self-mobilization with movement, or a dynamic stretch.
Moderately Impaired Group
This group is with participants with moderately impaired hip internal range of motion, from 20-24 degrees.
Hip Mobilization with Movement, Self-Mobilization with Movement, Dynamic Stretch
Participants receive either a therapist performed mobilization with movement, a self-mobilization with movement, or a dynamic stretch.
Severely Impaired Group
This group is with participants with severely impaired hip internal range of motion, less than 20 degrees.
Hip Mobilization with Movement, Self-Mobilization with Movement, Dynamic Stretch
Participants receive either a therapist performed mobilization with movement, a self-mobilization with movement, or a dynamic stretch.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hip Mobilization with Movement, Self-Mobilization with Movement, Dynamic Stretch
Participants receive either a therapist performed mobilization with movement, a self-mobilization with movement, or a dynamic stretch.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* FAI
* fracture
* surgery within last 6 months
* positive FADDIR/FABER
* symptomatic OA
* RA
* Neurologic conditions
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of South Carolina
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cathy Arnot
Clinical Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cathy Arnot, DPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of South Carolina
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of South Carolina
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hughes PE, Hsu JC, Matava MJ. Hip Anatomy and Biomechanics in the Athlete. Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review. 2002;10(2):103-114. doi:10.1097/00132585-200210020-00002.
Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically oriented anatomy. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health; 2014.
Byrne DP, Mulhall KJ, Baker JF. Anatomy & Biomechanics of the Hip. The Open Sports Medicine Journal. 2010;4(1):51-57. doi:10.2174/1874387001004010051.
Simoneau GG, Hoenig KJ, Lepley JE, Papanek PE. Influence of hip position and gender on active hip internal and external rotation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Sep;28(3):158-64. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.3.158.
Walsh R, Kinsella S. The effects of caudal mobilisation with movement (MWM) and caudal self-mobilisation with movement (SMWM) in relation to restricted internal rotation in the hip: A randomised control pilot study. Man Ther. 2016 Apr;22:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
Sadeghisani M, Manshadi FD, Kalantari KK, Rahimi A, Namnik N, Karimi MT, Oskouei AE. Correlation between Hip Rotation Range-of-Motion Impairment and Low Back Pain. A Literature Review. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2015 Oct;17(5):455-62. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1186813.
Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Vos T, Buchbinder R. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;64(6):2028-37. doi: 10.1002/art.34347. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
Van Dillen LR, Bloom NJ, Gombatto SP, Susco TM. Hip rotation range of motion in people with and without low back pain who participate in rotation-related sports. Phys Ther Sport. 2008 May;9(2):72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2008.01.002.
Almeida GP, de Souza VL, Sano SS, Saccol MF, Cohen M. Comparison of hip rotation range of motion in judo athletes with and without history of low back pain. Man Ther. 2012 Jun;17(3):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
Albertin ES, Miley EN, May J, Baker RT, Reordan D. The Effects of Hip Mobilizations on Patient Outcomes: A Critically Appraised Topic. J Sport Rehabil. 2019 May 1;28(4):390-394. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0238. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
Steultjens MP, Dekker J, van Baar ME, Oostendorp RA, Bijlsma JW. Range of joint motion and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Sep;39(9):955-61. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.9.955.
Dekker J, Boot B, van der Woude LH, Bijlsma JW. Pain and disability in osteoarthritis: a review of biobehavioral mechanisms. J Behav Med. 1992 Apr;15(2):189-214. doi: 10.1007/BF00848325.
Shakoor N, Lee KJ, Fogg LF, Block JA. Generalized vibratory deficits in osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep 15;59(9):1237-40. doi: 10.1002/art.24004.
Bennell KL, Hinman RS. A review of the clinical evidence for exercise in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Jan;14(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
Beselga C, Neto F, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Hall T, Oliveira-Campelo N. Immediate effects of hip mobilization with movement in patients with hip osteoarthritis: A randomised controlled trial. Man Ther. 2016 Apr;22:80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
Mulligan, B. R. (1993). Mobilisations with movement (MWM'S). Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 1(4), 154-156.
Hsieh CY, Vicenzino B, Yang CH, Hu MH, Yang C. Mulligan's mobilization with movement for the thumb: a single case report using magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the positional fault hypothesis. Man Ther. 2002 Feb;7(1):44-9. doi: 10.1054/math.2001.0434. No abstract available.
Kavanagh J. Is there a positional fault at the inferior tibiofibular joint in patients with acute or chronic ankle sprains compared to normals? Man Ther. 1999 Feb;4(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/s1356-689x(99)80005-8.
Vicenzino B, Paungmali A, Teys P. Mulligan's mobilization-with-movement, positional faults and pain relief: current concepts from a critical review of literature. Man Ther. 2007 May;12(2):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
Yildirim MS, Ozyurek S, Tosun O, Uzer S, Gelecek N. Comparison of effects of static, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and Mulligan stretching on hip flexion range of motion: a randomized controlled trial. Biol Sport. 2016 Mar;33(1):89-94. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1194126. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
Boykin RE, Stull JD, Giphart JE, Wijdicks CA, Philippon MJ. Femoroacetabular impingement in a professional soccer player. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 May;21(5):1203-11. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2097-0. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
Burns SA, Mintken PE, Austin GP, Cleland J. Short-term response of hip mobilizations and exercise in individuals with chronic low back pain: a case series. J Man Manip Ther. 2011 May;19(2):100-7. doi: 10.1179/2042618610Y.0000000007.
Abbott JH. Mobilization with movement applied to the elbow affects shoulder range of movement in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia. Man Ther. 2001 Aug;6(3):170-7. doi: 10.1054/math.2001.0407.
Vicenzino B, Branjerdporn M, Teys P, Jordan K. Initial changes in posterior talar glide and dorsiflexion of the ankle after mobilization with movement in individuals with recurrent ankle sprain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Jul;36(7):464-71. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2265.
Bandy WD, Irion JM, Briggler M. The effect of static stretch and dynamic range of motion training on the flexibility of the hamstring muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Apr;27(4):295-300. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1998.27.4.295.
Lachtman DS, Bartha DA, Beltran MM, Dominguez DN, Messerli AR, Miller SE, Davis AM, Nelson-Wong E. Rater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Single and Dual Bubble Inclinometry to Assess Cervical Lateral Flexion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Oct;38(8):572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
Kolber MJ, Pizzini M, Robinson A, Yanez D, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of measurements used to quantify lumbar spine mobility: an analysis of an iphone(R) application and gravity based inclinometry. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;8(2):129-37.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00089974
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.