Extremity Manipulation Impact on Postural Sway Characteristics

NCT ID: NCT03414749

Last Updated: 2020-02-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-24

Study Completion Date

2017-08-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate the multi-segmental postural sway after upper versus lower extremity manipulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The focus of this study is to explore the effect of upper and lower extremity chiropractic adjustments (manipulation) as well as surface condition (hard surface vs rocker board) on multisegmental postural control as represented by postural sway. Using a rocker (tilt) board, the participant cannot stand still, but has to adjust posture continuously to maintain balance. Body sways are considered to be self-induced because the design of the rocker board creates a natural instability without any external perturbation. This task provides a self-driven sensorimotor condition in addition to amplifying the sway dynamics. Because the rocker board has only one degree of freedom of motion, anteroposterior and lateral sways were considered separately on the device.

The investigators had the following hypotheses.

Hypothesis 1: Lower extremity adjustments will lead to reduced postural sway magnitude compared to upper extremity adjustments.

Hypothesis 2: Lower extremity adjustments will reduce sway variability of the rocker board, trunk and head compared to upper extremity adjustments.

Hypothesis 3: Lower extremity adjustments will facilitate the organization of sway behavior as assessed by the chaotic structure of sway.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This study used a randomized, crossover experimental design over three days of testing.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Treatment was unknown to outcome assessors. Participant were unaware of what the treatment would be and how it may / may not impact the outcome.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lower Extremity First (LEF)

The treatment was a non-specific long-axis distraction to the ankle, knee, and hip provided was at the discretion of the clinic doctor (over 25 years experience).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lower Extremity First (LEF)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The intervention for the LEF group was a non-specific long-axis distraction to the ankle, knee, and hip or shoulder, elbow and wrist provided was at the discretion of the clinic doctor (over 25 years experience).

Upper Extremity First (UEF)

The treatment was a non-specific long-axis distraction to the shoulder, elbow and wrist provided was at the discretion of the clinic doctor (over 25 years experience).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Upper Extremity First (UEF)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The intervention for the UEF group was a non-specific long-axis distraction to the shoulder, elbow and wrist provided was at the discretion of the clinic doctor (over 25 years experience).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lower Extremity First (LEF)

The intervention for the LEF group was a non-specific long-axis distraction to the ankle, knee, and hip or shoulder, elbow and wrist provided was at the discretion of the clinic doctor (over 25 years experience).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Upper Extremity First (UEF)

The intervention for the UEF group was a non-specific long-axis distraction to the shoulder, elbow and wrist provided was at the discretion of the clinic doctor (over 25 years experience).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* student in Parker University's Doctor of Chiropractic program and patient at the Parker University Wellness Clinic;
* available to take part in the study for all 3 test days;
* willing to forgo all non-normal daily activities and chiropractic treatments during the test days;

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnant;
* previous major injury involving the extremities;
* previous surgeries to an extremity joint; and
* known neurological or systemic diseases.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Miami

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Whittier University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Houston

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Parker University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Katherine A Pohlman, DC, MS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Parker University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Parker University

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Parker17_001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gluteal Activation Plus Movement Retraining
NCT07293039 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Hip Activation and FSDT
NCT05642065 COMPLETED NA