Adjunctive Use of an Antibacterial Honey Dressing for Palatal Wound Healing After Harvesting a Free Gingival Graft
NCT ID: NCT04269694
Last Updated: 2020-02-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-01
2020-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of a Carvacrol-loaded Absorbable Gelatin Sponge Used As a Palatal Dressing Following Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: a Randomized Clinical Study
NCT06806566
Effect of Melatonin on Palatal Wound Healing (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
NCT05122130
Comparing Two Wound Coverings for Healing and Comfort After Palatal Gum Graft Surgery in Adults
NCT06950359
Platelet-Rich Fibrin Dressing in the Management of Free Gingival Graft
NCT03589235
Effect of Nano-Bio Fusion Gel on Palatal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Harvest.
NCT05442359
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One of the possible complications after harvesting the FGG is the excessive post-operative morbidity which could be in the form of discomfort, pain and bleeding. These problems may affect patient quality of life and may disturb his/her daily activities such as eating, drinking or speaking. Therefore, it is of value to include patient-related outcomes in relation to quality of life measures after soft tissue grafts in clinical trials. Eltas et al. 2014 compared the effects of a periodontal dressing, the Essix retainer, the modified Essix retainer, and modified Hawley retainer on pain, chewing, speaking, and appearance. Using a periodontal dressing was associated with more pain and bleeding after one-week post-surgery; however, the speaking and appearance in the visual analog scale (VAS) scores were lower. In light of the above, retainers might be the most appropriate in terms of pain and bleeding, but less ideal for speaking and appearance comfort. In other studies, hyaluronic-acid gels as well as platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) were applied at the donor site after FGG harvesting. Both PRF and hyaluronic-acid may provide significant benefits for wound healing parameters and reduce pain. Keceli et al. 2015 evaluated the effectiveness of an herbal extract on early wound healing following FGG and found fewer incidences of primary and secondary bleeding as well as lower pain levels during the first postoperative week. In a human study Patel et al. 2012 demonstrated that ozonated oil was able to accelerate palatal wound epithelialization in a significant manner, compared with the control group.
Honey has been used for medicinal purposes since antiquity. Lee et al. 2011 noted that honey use for burn wounds has been documented in modern-day scientific journals since as early as 1933. As interest in honey for medical purposes grew, many FDA-approved products began emerging. With more interest came an increase in clinical studies examining honey for treatment of a variety of wounds, including randomized trials, case series, and cross-sectional studies from specialties ranging from dermatology and general surgery to ophthalmology.
Clinical parameters and procedures:
Patients will receive an initial periodontal examination and treatment, if necessary. Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score needed to be \<20% to be eligible. Surgical procedures will be performed by the same periodontist. For all measurements the same periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy PCPUNC 15 mm, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL.) will be used. At the donor site, anesthesia will be achieved with palatal local infiltrations, with 1.8 mL lidocaine 2% 1:100,000 epinephrine. Once the graft is harvested, pressure will be applied to the palate until hemostasis is achieved. The length and width of the donor site will be measured and recorded. In control group, no dressing material will be applied to donor site. While in test group, an antibacterial honey dressing material (Medihoney, http://www.medihoney.com) will be applied to donor site. Medihoney is a mixture of two honeys derived from Australia and New Zealand containing glucose oxidase and Leptospermum compounds which contribute to its antibacterial activity. It is licensed for wound care in Australia, Europe and the USA. It works with the body's natural processes to bathe the wound bed promoting the removal of devitalized tissue. Its low pH (3.5-4.5) helps to lower the pH within the wound environment, which has been shown to have wound healing benefits.
All patients will receive the same analgesic (ibuprofen 600 mg) immediately after the surgery. All patients will receive the same postoperative instructions. Soft diet will be recommended for all patients. Chlorhexidine 0.12% mouth rinse will be prescribed to each patient for use twice daily. Ibuprofen 600 mg will also be prescribed for the patients to consume 1 tablet orally for every 8 hours. The participants will be asked to note the level of pain, and the level of discomfort (eating, speaking, etc.) from the donor site during the first postoperative week using a 0 to 10 pain visual analog scale (VAS) score by graphic format. Discomfort was defined as irritating sensation and difficulty in eating, speaking, etc. and pain as inability to function requiring analgesics. At the 1-week, 2-week and 4-week follow-up appointments, the length and width of the donor site will be measured and recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
No dressing applied in the donor site after harvesting the graft
No interventions assigned to this group
Test
An antibacterial honey dressing material (Medihoney, http://www.medihoney.com) will be applied to donor site.
Medihoney dressing
Medihoney is a mixture of two honeys derived from Australia and New Zealand containing glucose oxidase and Leptospermum compounds which contribute to its antibacterial activity.
Medihoney dressing
Medihoney is a mixture of two honeys derived from Australia and New Zealand containing glucose oxidase and Leptospermum compounds which contribute to its antibacterial activity.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Medihoney dressing
Medihoney is a mixture of two honeys derived from Australia and New Zealand containing glucose oxidase and Leptospermum compounds which contribute to its antibacterial activity.
Medihoney dressing
Medihoney is a mixture of two honeys derived from Australia and New Zealand containing glucose oxidase and Leptospermum compounds which contribute to its antibacterial activity.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* systemically healthy
* non-smoker
* full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores \<20%,
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnant women
* systemic antibiotics taken for at least six months
* has coagulation disorders (e.g. Hemophilia a/b, von Willebrand disease, liver disease, anticoagulative therapy)
* on corticosteroids, or with any systemic disease that precluded periodontal surgery.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riyadh Elm University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdullah Alrashidi
Board periodontics resident
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Burkhardt R, Hammerle CH, Lang NP, Research Group on Oral Soft Tissue B, Wound H. (2015) Self-reported pain perception of patients after mucosal graft harvesting in the palatal area. J Clin Periodontol 42:281-287 Chaiken, N. (2010) Pressure ulceration and the use of Active Leptospermum honey for debridement and healing. Ostomy Wound Management 56(5), 12-14. Cortellini P, Pini Prato G. (2012) Coronally advanced flap and combination therapy for root coverage. Clinical strategies based on scientific evidence and clinical experience. Periodontol 2000 59:158-84. Eltas A, Eltas SD, Uslu MO, Ersöz M. (2014) Evaluation of patient discomfort at the palatal donor site following free gingival graft procedures: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol Implant Dent. 6:47-53. Farnoush A. (1978) Techniques for the protection and coverage of the donor sites in free soft tissue grafts. J Periodontol. 49(8):403-5. Keceli HG, Aylikci BU, Koseoglu S, Dolgun A. (2015) Evaluation of palatal donor site haemostasis and wound healing after free gingival graft surgery. J Clin Periodontol. 42(6):582-9. Lee DS, Sinno S, Khachemoune A. (2012) Honey and wound healing: an overview. Am J Clin Dermatol. 12(3):181-90. Lorenzana ER, Allen EP. (2000) The single-incision palatal harvest technique: A strategy for esthetics and patient comfort. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 20:297-305. Milne SD, Connolly P. (2014) The influence of different dressings on the pH of the wound environment. J Wound Care. 23(2):53-4, 56-7. Molan PC. (2006) The evidence supporting the use of honey as a wound dressing. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 5:40-54. Ozcan, M., Ucak, O., Alkaya, B., Keceli, S., Seydaoglu, G., & Haytac, M. C. (2017) Effects of Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Palatal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Comparative Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 37(5). Patel PV, Kumar S, Vidya GD, Patel A, Holmes JC, Kumar V. (2012) Cytological assessment of healing palatal donor site wounds and grafted gingival wounds after application of ozonated oil: an eighteen-month randomized controlled clinical trial. Acta Cytol. 56(3):277-84. Yıldırım S, Özener HÖ, Doğan B, Kuru B. (2017) Effect of topically-applied hyaluronic-acid on pain and palatal epithelial wound healing: An examiner-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 88:1-14. Zucchelli G, Mele M, Stefanini M, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, Montebugnoli L, et al. (2010) Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelial connective tissue and de-epithelialized grafts: A comparative randomized-controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 37:728-38.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FPGRP/2019/438/36
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.