Effects of Mirror Therapy and Bilateral Arm Training on Hemiparetic Upper Extremity in Patients With Chronic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT04242316

Last Updated: 2020-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

101 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study included (1) to compare the effectiveness of mirror therapy (MT) and bimanual arm training (BAT) in improving motor and functional performance of hemiplegic upper extremity for adults with chronic stroke; (2) to examine whether recruitment of the mirror neurons, as reflected in mu rhythm suppression, mediates recognition of the mirror illusion in pre/post MT, as compared to BAT without a mirror in clients with chronic stroke, as compared to healthy participants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mirror Therapy (MT) appeared to have beneficial effects on the recovery of distal function of the hemiplegic hand in the evidence recently, however, it is not known whether the incongruent visual feedback induced by mirror in bilateral arm training (BAT) is beneficial to the motor performance of upper extremity than without the mirror in patients with chronic stroke. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of MT and bimanual arm training (BAT) in improving motor and functional performance of hemiplegic upper extremity for adults with chronic stroke. Participants with chronic stroke were recruited by convenience sampling from a convalescent hospital and self-help groups in the community in Hong Kong. Participants were randomly assigned to the MT group or BAT group and participated in a 6-week upper limb training programme which consisted of two 45-minute training sessions per week. Both kinds of training were equivalent to each other except that there was a mirror used in the MT group. Main outcome measures were upper extremity motor and functional tests, and grip strength. Participants were evaluated at baseline, post-treatment and 3-month follow-up. EEG was assessed before and after the training in a group of stroke patients and healthy controls, in order to evaluate the recruitment of the mirror neurons, as reflected in mu rhythm suppression.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Hemiplegia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mirror Therapy

Patients performed customized bimanual upper limb exercises with a mirror. They can observe the mirror visual feedback of their non-paretic hand during the movements.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirror Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients performed customized bimanual upper limb exercises with graded level of difficulty based on the patient's individual levels of upper limb functioning according to the 7 levels of the FTHUE and each level consisted of 5 standardized table-top tasks. The patients practiced the movements with the unaffected hand (including the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand). While watching the reflection of the unaffected hand in the mirror, the patient was then asked to moving the affected hand at the same time to synchronize the movement with the reflection of the unaffected hand. If the patient was unable to move the hand, a therapist would passively assist the movement of the affected hand so as to synchronize it with the reflection of the unaffected hand.

Bilateral arm training

Patients performed customized bimanual upper limb exercises without a mirror.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bilateral arm training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients performed customized bimanual upper limb exercises with graded level of difficulty based on the patient's individual levels of upper limb functioning according to the 7 levels of the FTHUE and each level consisted of 5 standardized table-top tasks, but without a mirror. The patients can take a direct view of their paretic hand.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mirror Therapy

Patients performed customized bimanual upper limb exercises with graded level of difficulty based on the patient's individual levels of upper limb functioning according to the 7 levels of the FTHUE and each level consisted of 5 standardized table-top tasks. The patients practiced the movements with the unaffected hand (including the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand). While watching the reflection of the unaffected hand in the mirror, the patient was then asked to moving the affected hand at the same time to synchronize the movement with the reflection of the unaffected hand. If the patient was unable to move the hand, a therapist would passively assist the movement of the affected hand so as to synchronize it with the reflection of the unaffected hand.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Bilateral arm training

Patients performed customized bimanual upper limb exercises with graded level of difficulty based on the patient's individual levels of upper limb functioning according to the 7 levels of the FTHUE and each level consisted of 5 standardized table-top tasks, but without a mirror. The patients can take a direct view of their paretic hand.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. neurological condition with unilateral hemiparesis;
2. a Functional Test of Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE) score between levels 2 to 6;
3. chronic stroke with onset of neurological condition more than 6 months previously;
4. ability to understand and follow simple verbal instructions;
5. ability to participate in a therapy session lasting at least 30 minutes;
6. community ambulant with or without aids.

Exclusion Criteria

Individuals with severe neglect and severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale \>3) would be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HSEARS20121012008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.