Mirror Therapy in Sensorimotor Recovery of Paretic Upper Extremity After Chronic Stroke
NCT ID: NCT04030806
Last Updated: 2019-07-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
26 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-07-03
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: To investigate the isolated effect of MT on motor function, sensitivity, muscle strength, manual dexterity and spasticity of the paretic UE of individuals with chronic hemiparesis after stroke.
Design: Randomized simple-blind trial. Subject: Twenty-six patients post chronic, aged between 30 and 80 years, with mild or moderate sensorimotor impairment in UE will be evaluated.
Intervention: The subjects will be randomly distributed in: intervention group will perform 60 minutes of MT and the control group will perform 60 minutes of control therapy composed of the same exercises, but without the mirror. Both groups will hold two sessions per week for six weeks.
Main measure: Participants will be evaluated before and after the intervention. They will be evaluated through the Fugl-Meyer Scale to measure UL sensorimotor performance, Box-and-Block Test for manual dexterity, Dynamometry for palmar grip strength and Modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity. With this study, it was expected that the intervention group presented better results regarding the sensorimotor function when compared to the control group.
The data will be expressed as mean and 95% confidence interval (continuous variable) and absolute frequency (categorical variables). To compare the outcomes of the different experimental sessions and at the different moments (pre and post session), the Generalized Estimating Equations with post hoc LSD (Least Significant Difference) methods will be used. For all analysis the significance level was set at α = 0.05 and statistical software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Mac, version 22.0, IBM, USA) will be used.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mirror Therapy in Pos Stroke Individuals
NCT03175237
Effects of Mirror Therapy and Bilateral Arm Training on Hemiparetic Upper Extremity in Patients With Chronic Stroke
NCT04242316
Neural Mechanisms and Efficacy of Dual Neurotechnology-aided Mirror Therapy in Chronic Stroke: Neural and Motor Plasticity, Movement Performance, Daily Function, and Quality of Life
NCT04326205
Effects of Home-based Neurostimulation Associated With Motor Training in Chronic Stroke Patients
NCT01034150
Effects and Mechanisms of Treatment Intensity of Mirror Therapy in Patients With Subacute Stroke
NCT01655160
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
All patients will perform 60 minutes of intervention, twice a week, for six weeks. During the intervention, the patient will be positioned seated in a chair with a table in front of him and a mirror (50cm x 50cm) will be placed vertically between his upper extremity.
The patient's paretic upper extremity will be positioned behind the mirror, allowing only the movements of his healthy upper extremity to be visualized. The reflective side of the mirror will be facing the healthy upper extremity , the patient will perform the exercises observing the movements of his healthy upper extremity through the reflection produced by the mirror, interpreting as the movement of his paretic member.
Mirror therapy intervention and control intervention
The exercise protocol will be composed of bimanual activities, performed by both the hands of the patient (paretic and healthy). The same protocol will be applied for both groups (intervention group and control group).
Initially, the desensitization of the limbs will be accomplished by brushing the skin with objects of different textures (sponge, brush, cloths). Afterwards, isolated exercises of fingers (flexion-extension, opposition), wrists (flexo-extension), forearms (prono-supination) and elbows (flexo-extension) and functional exercises such as cleaning a table with a cloth, tightening sponges, roll balls. Each exercise will be performed slowly and repeated for 15 times, totaling three series of each exercise. The protocol used will be based on the proposal of Rothgangel and Braun (2013). The intervention will be carried out by the author of the project and by students of scientific initiation.
Control group
All patients will perform 60 minutes of intervention, twice a week, for six weeks. The mirror will be placed in the same position as the intervention group. However, the subject will have access to the non-reflective side of the mirror, directly visualizing the movement of his healthy arm. In the control group, the patients will be submitted to the same bimanual activities of the intervention group, but without the reflecting side of the mirror. Thus, the nonreflective side of the mirror will be facing the healthy arm, the patient will perform the same exercises visualizing only the movement of the healthy member.
Mirror therapy intervention and control intervention
The exercise protocol will be composed of bimanual activities, performed by both the hands of the patient (paretic and healthy). The same protocol will be applied for both groups (intervention group and control group).
Initially, the desensitization of the limbs will be accomplished by brushing the skin with objects of different textures (sponge, brush, cloths). Afterwards, isolated exercises of fingers (flexion-extension, opposition), wrists (flexo-extension), forearms (prono-supination) and elbows (flexo-extension) and functional exercises such as cleaning a table with a cloth, tightening sponges, roll balls. Each exercise will be performed slowly and repeated for 15 times, totaling three series of each exercise. The protocol used will be based on the proposal of Rothgangel and Braun (2013). The intervention will be carried out by the author of the project and by students of scientific initiation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mirror therapy intervention and control intervention
The exercise protocol will be composed of bimanual activities, performed by both the hands of the patient (paretic and healthy). The same protocol will be applied for both groups (intervention group and control group).
Initially, the desensitization of the limbs will be accomplished by brushing the skin with objects of different textures (sponge, brush, cloths). Afterwards, isolated exercises of fingers (flexion-extension, opposition), wrists (flexo-extension), forearms (prono-supination) and elbows (flexo-extension) and functional exercises such as cleaning a table with a cloth, tightening sponges, roll balls. Each exercise will be performed slowly and repeated for 15 times, totaling three series of each exercise. The protocol used will be based on the proposal of Rothgangel and Braun (2013). The intervention will be carried out by the author of the project and by students of scientific initiation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age between 30 and 80 years;
3. Spasticity ≤ 3 in the flexor muscles of the elbow, wrist and fingers, shoulder horizontal adductor (Ashworth Modified Scale);
4. Mild or moderate sensorimotor impairment (Fugl-Meyer score scale - mild: 58-64 points, moderate: 39-57 points);
5. Present ability to understand the instructions of the study (Mini-Mental score ≥ 18 for schooled individuals and ≥ 13 for illiterate individuals);
6. Present muscular strength ≥ 3 in the flexor muscles of shoulder, and extensors of elbow and wrist.
7. Be able to stay in position for more than 30 minutes;
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of severe depression or severe psychiatric disorder;
3. Other neurological or musculoskeletal disorders in the upper limb not related to the stroke;
4. Severe visuospatial negligence.
30 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Caren Luciane Bernardi
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Caren Luciane Bernardi
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CBernardi
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.