Is Thoracic Paravertebral Block a Better Option Than Conscious Sedation for PRFA of Liver Tumors

NCT ID: NCT04241887

Last Updated: 2020-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-09

Study Completion Date

2019-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Percutaneus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver tumors causes acute pain during the periooperative setting. In order to facilitate tumor access, patient should collaborate with a surgeon during the procedurÄ™, therefore should be conscious.

This study aims to assess the impact of a single shot thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) on a patient's haemodynamic stability, patient's and operator's comfort and satisfaction during the operation and analgesia in the post-operative period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

High temperatures used during the percutaneus radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) of liver tumors can cause acute pain in the perioperative setting. In order to facilitate tumor exposure and access, patient should collaborate with a surgeon during the procedurÄ™, therefore should be conscious. It is mandatory to provide an adequate acute postoperative pain control for our patients.

This prospective randomized, single center study was approved by the Bioethics Committee at the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, (Poland) under the resolution No. 46/2017.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver Tumor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

30 patients scheduled for an elective Percutaneus Radiofrequency Ablation (PRFA) of a hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided in 2 groups:

* group PVB - 15 patients under paravertebral block anaesthesia
* group BB - 15 patients under local anesthesia, without paravertebral block.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants were randomly assigned into 2 groups (computerized randomization program).

group PVB - patients under paravertebral block anesthesia, group BB - patients under local anesthesia, without paravertebral block.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group PVB

standard analgosedation + paravertebral thoracic blockade with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine (Bupivacainum hydrochloricum WZF 0,5%, Polfa warszawa S.A.)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

thoracic paravertebral blockade

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anesthesia was performed under the ultrasound guidance: the Th8 spinous process was identified, then a probe was moved lateral to medial until two adjacent transverse processes and the pleura were visible. After anaesthetising the skin with 2ml of 1% lignocaine (Lignocainum hydrochlorici, WZF 1%), the Touhy needle 22G (Smith Medical)was introduced under the real time guidance. Once in the paravertebral space, 20ml of 0,25% bupivacaine (Bupivacainum hydrochloricum WZF 0,5%, Polfa Warsaw SA) was injected with an end point of a characteristic pleural displacement.

group BB

standard analgosedation + local anesthesia of the skin and subcutaneous tissue with 5ml 0,5% lignocaine (Lignocainum hydrochlorici, WZF 1%).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

local anaesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local infiltration anaesthesia with 0.5% lignocaine 5ml (Lignocainum hydrochlorici, WZF 1%) was applied to the skin and the potential needle path of ablation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

thoracic paravertebral blockade

Anesthesia was performed under the ultrasound guidance: the Th8 spinous process was identified, then a probe was moved lateral to medial until two adjacent transverse processes and the pleura were visible. After anaesthetising the skin with 2ml of 1% lignocaine (Lignocainum hydrochlorici, WZF 1%), the Touhy needle 22G (Smith Medical)was introduced under the real time guidance. Once in the paravertebral space, 20ml of 0,25% bupivacaine (Bupivacainum hydrochloricum WZF 0,5%, Polfa Warsaw SA) was injected with an end point of a characteristic pleural displacement.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

local anaesthesia

Local infiltration anaesthesia with 0.5% lignocaine 5ml (Lignocainum hydrochlorici, WZF 1%) was applied to the skin and the potential needle path of ablation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with primary liver tumor (HCC)
* patient scheduled for an elective surgery
* tumor diameter) \<5 cm two tumors \<3cm
* Age \>18 years
* Physical State 1,2 or 3 of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA)

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA IV and V
* Thrombocytopenia (\<40x10 \^ 9 / L)
* Severe cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C classification)
* History of psychiatric/cognitive disease
* Patients who do not give informed consent
* Patients with contraindications or history of hypersensitivity to local anaesthesia drugs
* History of chronic pain, chronic opioid use (\> 3 months)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Warmia and Mazury

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Malgorzata Braczkowska

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ewa Mayzner-Zawadzka, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Warmia and Mazury Faculty of Medicine (University Hospital)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Clinical Ward, Clinical University Hospital

Olsztyn, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UWarmiaMazury-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.