Retrolaminar Block Versus Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Liver Resection Surgery
NCT ID: NCT06621472
Last Updated: 2025-06-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-01
2025-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Open Liver Resection Surgery
NCT05253079
TAPB Combined With RSB Versus ESPB for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Liver Resection
NCT06133725
Role of Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Pain Control After Hepatectomy
NCT06224179
Comparison Between Epidural and Bilateral Paravertebral Blocks in Liver Resection
NCT01407666
Retrolaminar Block Versus Tab Block in Abdomioasty
NCT06265402
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Ultrasound-guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block is proven to provide adequate analgesia for upper and lower abdominal surgeries. A local anesthetic (LA) is deposited in the plane between the transversus abdominis and posterior sheath of the rectus muscle in the subcostal region to anesthetize the anterior cutaneous branches of the lower intercostal nerves (T7-T11). In this study, we aimed to compare the analgesic effect of RLB and subcostal TAP block in patients undergoing open liver resection surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
• Group R: Retrolaminar block (RLB)
Patients will receive bilateral ultrasound guided retrolaminar block with injection of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% in each side.
Retrolaminar block group
patients will be placed in a sitting position. The transducer will be positioned vertically 3 cm lateral to the midline at the level of the 7th thoracic transverse process. The muscles of the back, the transverse process, and the pleura between two transverse processes will be visualized. The needle will be introduced in a cranial-caudal direction toward the lamina using the in-plane method until the tip lay in the lamina 1 mL of normal saline will be injected to confirm the correct needle tip position by visualizing the spread. After negative aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% isobaric bupivacaine. The procedure will be repeated on the opposite side.
Group T. Subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (STAP)
Patients will receive bilateral Ultrasound guided subcostal TAP with injection of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% in each side.
subcostal TAP technique
The transducer will be placed obliquely along the subcostal margin near the xiphisternum in the midline of the abdomen. The rectus abdominis muscle and underlying transversus abdominis muscle will be identified. The position of the transversus abdominis muscle will be confirmed by sliding the transducer laterally until the aponeuroses of the external and internal oblique muscle will be visualized. The transversus abdominis muscle will be then identified, being posterior to the internal oblique muscle and will be followed back medially to confirm its position beneath the rectus muscle. the needle will be introduced through the rectus muscle in a superomedial-to-inferolateral direction towards the transversus abdominis muscle using the in-plane method, and 20 mL of 0.25% isobaric bupivacaine will be injected
Epidural
By loss of resistant technique and catheter insertion at the level of thoracic vertebrae (7-10)
thoracic Epidural
Before induction of general anesthesia the epidural catheter was inserted under sterile condition with a loss of resistance technique by an 18G needle at a mid-thoracic level (Th 7-10) to cover the dermatomes innervating the incision in the upper abdomen. The epidural infusion consisting of bupivacaine 1 mg/mL, and fentanyl 2 μg/mL was activated on the attending anesthesiologist's decision. Following the hospital protocols, the infusion rate was initiated at 5-10 mL/h, increased to maximum 15 mL/h if necessary, bolus dose of 5 mL was allowed every 30 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Retrolaminar block group
patients will be placed in a sitting position. The transducer will be positioned vertically 3 cm lateral to the midline at the level of the 7th thoracic transverse process. The muscles of the back, the transverse process, and the pleura between two transverse processes will be visualized. The needle will be introduced in a cranial-caudal direction toward the lamina using the in-plane method until the tip lay in the lamina 1 mL of normal saline will be injected to confirm the correct needle tip position by visualizing the spread. After negative aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% isobaric bupivacaine. The procedure will be repeated on the opposite side.
subcostal TAP technique
The transducer will be placed obliquely along the subcostal margin near the xiphisternum in the midline of the abdomen. The rectus abdominis muscle and underlying transversus abdominis muscle will be identified. The position of the transversus abdominis muscle will be confirmed by sliding the transducer laterally until the aponeuroses of the external and internal oblique muscle will be visualized. The transversus abdominis muscle will be then identified, being posterior to the internal oblique muscle and will be followed back medially to confirm its position beneath the rectus muscle. the needle will be introduced through the rectus muscle in a superomedial-to-inferolateral direction towards the transversus abdominis muscle using the in-plane method, and 20 mL of 0.25% isobaric bupivacaine will be injected
thoracic Epidural
Before induction of general anesthesia the epidural catheter was inserted under sterile condition with a loss of resistance technique by an 18G needle at a mid-thoracic level (Th 7-10) to cover the dermatomes innervating the incision in the upper abdomen. The epidural infusion consisting of bupivacaine 1 mg/mL, and fentanyl 2 μg/mL was activated on the attending anesthesiologist's decision. Following the hospital protocols, the infusion rate was initiated at 5-10 mL/h, increased to maximum 15 mL/h if necessary, bolus dose of 5 mL was allowed every 30 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
History of psychological disorders and/or chronic pain. Contraindication to regional anesthesia e.g., local sepsis, pre- existing peripheral neuropathies, and coagulopathy.
Severe respiratory, cardiac disorders and renal disease.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sayed Mahmoud Abed
assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
sayed M Abed
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Joshi GP, Kehlet H. Postoperative pain management in the era of ERAS: An overview. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep;33(3):259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Agarwal V, Divatia JV: Enhanced recovery after surgery in liver resection: current concepts and controversies. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019, 72:119-29. 10.4097/kja.d.19.00010
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
analgesia in hepatectomy
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.