Optimizing the Number of Systematic COres During a MRI Target Biopsy

NCT ID: NCT04183699

Last Updated: 2024-06-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

265 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-06

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multicentre, paired-cohort, prospective, controlled study. The patient with a suspicion of PCa and a concomitant positive mpMRI (defined as presence of one lesion PI-RADS ≥ 3) will receive a MRI-TBx (4 target cores). During the same session, subsequently to MRI-TBx, patient will receive a systematic sampling with 6-core S-Bx followed by 14-core S-Bx, for a total of 20-core systematic cores, in addition to 4 MRI-TBx cores. Procedure will be performed by the same operator. Each single core will be stored in a dedicated cassette and sequentially numbered. We hypothesize that the proportion of csPCa (defined as prostate cancer with Gleason score ≥ 3+4) detected by 6-cores S-Bx will be no less than that detected by 20-cores S-Bx, both performed in addition to MRI-TBx. Assessing the optimal number of systematic cores to take in addition to MRI-TBx cores in men undergoing a MRI-TBx would provide a useful clinical information for every day clinical practice. Moreover, the possibility to decrease the number of systematic cores taken during a MRI-TBx, hence reducing the overall number of cores taken during a biopsy, would reduce the length of the diagnostic procedure, potentially reduce the probability of infections/sepsis and reduce the overdiagnosis of clinically insignificant PCa.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Suspicion of Prostate Cancer With a Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance of the Prostate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MRI targeted + systematic random biopsy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prostate biopsy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

MRI-targeted + systematic random prostate biopsy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prostate biopsy

MRI-targeted + systematic random prostate biopsy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male patients, aged between 18 and 80 years old with suspicion of prostate cancer
* Presence of a positive mpMRI of the prostate (visible lesion PI-RADS ≥ 3)
* Serum PSA ≤ 20ng/ml
* Suspected stage ≤ T2 on rectal examination (organ confined prostate)
* Fit to undergo a prostate biopsy
* Able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior positive prostate biopsy
* Prior treatment of the prostate
* Prostate volume \<30 ml at mpMRI of the prostate
* More than one lesion at mpMRI of the prostate
* Contraindication to prostate biopsy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IRCCS San Raffaele

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Alberto Briganti

Full Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IRCCS San Raffaele

Milan, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Armando Stabile

Role: CONTACT

+390226435660

Lucia Dambrosio

Role: CONTACT

+390226435660

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lucia Dambrosio

Role: primary

+390226435660

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SCOT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.