Multicentric Evaluation of the True Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric MRI for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Cystoprostatectomy Specimen as Reference

NCT ID: NCT03960112

Last Updated: 2020-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the negative predictive value of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer using cystoprostatectomy specimen as the reference

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To evaluate the negative predictive value of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer using cystoprostatectomy specimen as the reference

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Per patient analysis in a prospective, multicenter cohort, open study.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

mpMRI

mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer in a per patient analysis using cystoprostatectomy specimen

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mpMRI

Intervention Type DEVICE

mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer in a per patient analysis using cystoprostatectomy specimen

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mpMRI

mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer in a per patient analysis using cystoprostatectomy specimen

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. age \>18 years
2. male patient scheduled for cystoprostatectomy as treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer (clinical T2-T3, any N) or high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (pT1 or CIS)
3. no known diagnosis of prostate cancer
4. no contraindication to undergo multiparametric MRI
5. Signed written informed consent prior to any screening procedures being performed
6. Patient affiliated to the ''National security'' regimen or beneficiary of this regimen

Exclusion Criteria

1. allergy against MR contrast media
2. diagnosis or previous treatment of prostate cancer
3. severe renal insufficiency (GFR \<30ml/min)
4. Bladder cancer infiltrating the prostate (T4)
5. Pelvic metallic implants such as hip prosthesis
6. Patients scheduled for cystoprostatectomy with prostate capsule sparing
7. Patients unable to provide informed consent
8. Patients having a prostate biopsy \<6 month
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut Paoli-Calmettes

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jochen WALZ, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institut Paoli Calmettes

Marseille, Bouches Du Rhone, France

Site Status

CHRU Hopital Edouard Herriot

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Hopital Nord

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Paris, , France

Site Status

Chu Saint Etienne

Saint-Etienne, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dominique GENRE, MD

Role: CONTACT

33 (0)4 91 22 37 78

Margot BERLINE, MSc, MBA

Role: CONTACT

33 (0)4 91 22 33 14

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dominique Genre, MD

Role: primary

0033491223778

Marc COLOMBEL, Pr

Role: primary

David Chemouni, MD

Role: primary

Aude Fregeville, MD

Role: primary

Nicolas MOTTET-AUSELO, Dr

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R, Marconi L, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, van der Kwast TH, Matveev VB, van der Poel HG, De Santis M, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Yuan CY, Cornford P, Mottet N, Lam TB, Rouviere O. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):250-266. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28336078 (View on PubMed)

N. Mottet JB, E. Briers, R.C.N. van den Bergh, M. Bolla, N.J. van Casteren, P. Cornford, S. Culine, S. Joniau, T. Lam, M.D. Mason, V. Matveev, H. van der Poel, T.H. van der Kwast, O. Rouvière, T. Wiegel. Guidelines on prostate cancer. European Association of Urology Web site https://uroweborg/guideline/prostate-cancer/. Accessed May 17, 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Schoots IG, Petrides N, Giganti F, Bokhorst LP, Rannikko A, Klotz L, Villers A, Hugosson J, Moore CM. Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):627-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.050. Epub 2014 Nov 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25511988 (View on PubMed)

Le JD, Tan N, Shkolyar E, Lu DY, Kwan L, Marks LS, Huang J, Margolis DJ, Raman SS, Reiter RE. Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology. Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.079. Epub 2014 Sep 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25257029 (View on PubMed)

Branger N, Maubon T, Traumann M, Thomassin-Piana J, Brandone N, Taix S, Touzlian J, Brunelle S, Pignot G, Salem N, Gravis G, Walz J. Is negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging really able to exclude significant prostate cancer? The real-life experience. BJU Int. 2017 Mar;119(3):449-455. doi: 10.1111/bju.13657. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27618134 (View on PubMed)

Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28110982 (View on PubMed)

Robertson NL, Hu Y, Ahmed HU, Freeman A, Barratt D, Emberton M. Prostate cancer risk inflation as a consequence of image-targeted biopsy of the prostate: a computer simulation study. Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.12.057. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23312572 (View on PubMed)

Wetterauer C, Weibel M, Gsponer JR, Vlajnic T, Zellweger T, Butikofer S, Muller G, Puschel H, Bachmann A, Gasser TC, Bubendorf L, Rentsch CA. Incidental prostate cancer prevalence at radical cystoprostatectomy--importance of the histopathological work-up. Virchows Arch. 2014 Dec;465(6):629-36. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1656-9. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25269630 (View on PubMed)

Bains LJ, Studer UE, Froehlich JM, Giannarini G, Triantafyllou M, Fleischmann A, Thoeny HC. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging detects significant prostate cancer with high probability. J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):737-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.039. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24641913 (View on PubMed)

Steinberg DM, Fine J, Chappell R. Sample size for positive and negative predictive value in diagnostic research using case-control designs. Biostatistics. 2009 Jan;10(1):94-105. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn018. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18556677 (View on PubMed)

DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3203132 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NPV-MRI-02-IPC 2017-047

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.