Personalized Optimization of Systematic Prostate Biopsy

NCT ID: NCT05998278

Last Updated: 2025-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

330 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-08-23

Study Completion Date

2025-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Targeted biopsy combined systematic biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of prostate cancer. Excessive cores in systematic biopsy increases the risk of puncture trauma, bleeding and infection. On the basis of establishing a model with DRS stratification to reduce the cores of systematic biopsy, we propose the (12 cores -x) model innovatively. We hope that through this prospective study to verify the efficacy of the model and provide patients with a new biopsy model with high accuracy and fewer complications.

In this study, patients with suspected prostate cancer were randomly divided into two groups. Experimental group received targeted biopsy combined personalized systematic biopsy, and the control group received systematic biopsy .The differences of the detection rate of Prostate cancer between the two groups were compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, patients with suspected prostate cancer were were enrolled at our institution, a public referral tertiary center. After written consent was obtained,Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group in a 1:1 ratio by a research nurse who was not involved in the clinical study, using Computer-generated randomization method. Once the allocation was established, neither patients nor investigators, including the member of the study who collected the data related to infectious events later, were blinded. Prior to biopsy, the following patient characteristics were obtained: age, BMI, serum PSA levels, location and size of the region of interest, and PIRADS-V2 score. Biopsy was performed by an experienced urologist using standard transperineal technique. The patient was placed in the lithotomy position and underwent either general anesthesia or local anesthesia (15 ml of 5% lidocaine was injected into the prostate capsule and apex under ultrasound guidance after the ultrasound probe was inserted transrectally for local anesthesia). Patients assigned to the experimental group were informed of the personalized systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy using the (12 cores -x) model (https://daringsky.shinyapps.io/prediction\_v2/), and the control group received systematic biopsy. A biopsy core was obtained using an 18-gauge 25cm needle and a spring needle biopsy gun. The primary endpoint was the rate of prostate cancer diagnosis, including clinically significant cases. The secondary endpoints included pain scores and complications such as hematuria, perineal hematoma, urinary tract infection, and urinary retention.

An interim analysis is planned after approximately 50% of the target sample size has completed follow-up for the primary endpoint. The interim analysis aims to:

1. assess safety data to ensure participant protection, and
2. explore preliminary efficacy trends.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Adenocarcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

They were randomly divided into two groups. One group received systematic biopsy. The other group received Targeted biopsy + personalized reduced-core biopsy .
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group

Experimental group received targeted biopsy plus personalized systematic biopsy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Personalized Optimization of Systematic Prostate Biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Login the model based on our previous study (https://daringsky.shinyapps.io/prediction\_v2/) allows for input of age, BMI, serum PSA, size and location of suspicious lesions, PIRADS - V2 score, and prostate volume to generate an individualized needle distribution map,then targeted biopsy combined personalized optimization of systematic prostate biopsy was performed.

Control group

Control group received systematic biopsy

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Personalized Optimization of Systematic Prostate Biopsy

Login the model based on our previous study (https://daringsky.shinyapps.io/prediction\_v2/) allows for input of age, BMI, serum PSA, size and location of suspicious lesions, PIRADS - V2 score, and prostate volume to generate an individualized needle distribution map,then targeted biopsy combined personalized optimization of systematic prostate biopsy was performed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with lesions found on rectal examination with any PSA value;
2. Patients with abnormal lesions found on imaging with any PSA value;
3. PSA \>10.0 ng.ml-1;
4. Patients with PSA of 4.0-10.0 ng.ml-1 and fPSA/tPSA \< 0.16; (5 ) mpMRI was performed prior to biopsy and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS V2.1) assessment category ≥3

(6) Willing to truthfully fill in the subject survey scale; (7) Willing to undergo follow-up; (8) The patient himself or his authorized immediate family member has signed the informed consent for clinical trial.

Exclusion Criteria

1. previous biopsy cases;
2. Patients who have undergone prostate-related surgery, radiotherapy, or anti-androgen therapy;
3. Patients whopresented with severe hemorrhoids or rectal stenosis, rendering them intolerant to transrectal ultrasound
4. clotting disordersPatients with severe systemic diseases, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disorders, are not appropriate candidates for surgical intervention.
5. unable to follow the plan.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zhenlin Chen

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jiabing Zheng

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +8613799422519

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jiabing Zheng

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chen Z, Qu M, Shen X, Jiang S, Zhang W, Ji J, Wang Y, Zhang J, Chen Z, Lin L, Li M, Wu C, Gao X. Establishment of an Individualized Predictive Model to Reduce the Core Number for Systematic Prostate Biopsy: A Dual Center Study Based on Stratification of the Disease Risk Score. Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 14;11:831603. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.831603. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35237503 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022WSJK030

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id