Micro-ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

NCT ID: NCT04832997

Last Updated: 2025-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-14

Study Completion Date

2025-07-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a single-center, paired-cohort, prospective study. Patients with a clinical suspicion of csPCa will receive mpMRI and Micro-US in two different visits. The results of the diagnostic procedures will determine how many and which type prostate biopsies patients will undergo. During the following visit, patients with both positive mpMRI and Micro-US, defined as the presence of one or more lesions with PI-RADS ≥ 3 and PRI-MUS ≥ 3 respectively, will receive a 12-core TRUSBx in addiction to MRI-TBx and Micro-US-TBx (Group 4). Patients with both negative mpMRI and Micro-US will receive a 12-core TRUSBx (Group 1). Patients with only positive mpMRI will receive MRI-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx (Group 2). Patients with only positive Micro-US-TBx will receive Micro-US-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx (Group 3).

Our hypothesis is that the sensitivity for csPCa (defined as prostate cancer with Gleason score ≥ 3+4) of Micro-US will be superior or at least equal to that of mpMRI. Despite the introduction of the mpMRI and MRI-TBx has improved the diagnostic pathway of PCa, the proportion of men with negative mpMRI with a csPCa is still difficult to delineate due to the high variability of mpMRI negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity. In this context, a specific standardization of the use of Micro-US may play a crucial role to optimize PCa diagnostic pathway. Moreover, a direct comparison between Micro-US and mpMRI might be useful to determinate whether Micro-US could be more accurate than mpMRI for PCa diagnosis. Furthermore, in patients with suspicion of PCa the combined use between mpMRI and Micro-US might increase the detection of csPCa and reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, improving mpMRI limitations in NPV and specificity. Demonstrating that Micro-US provides a similar sensitivity for csPCa as compared to mpMRI may lead to its definitive inclusion in daily clinical practice, potentially replacing mpMRI, streamlining the current diagnostic pathway of PCa.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Every patient will receive the same diagnostic test (MRI and Micro-US) in a randomized sequence
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

mpMRI plus Micro-US

Patients with a clinical suspicion of csPCa will receive mpMRI and Micro-US in two different visits (randomized sequence). The results of the diagnostic procedures will determine how many and which type of prostate biopsies patients will undergo.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prostate biopsy systematic random prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) + eventual MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) + eventual microUS-targeted (Micro-US-TBx)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients with both positive mpMRI and Micro-US, defined as the presence of one or more lesions with PI-RADS \>= 3 and PRI-MUS \>= 3 respectively, will receive a 12-core TRUSBx in addiction to MRI-TBx and Micro-US-TBx. Patients with both negative mpMRI and Micro-US will receive a 12-core TRUSBx. Patients with only positive mpMRI will receive MRI-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx. Patients with only positive Micro-US-TBx will receive Micro-US-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prostate biopsy systematic random prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) + eventual MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) + eventual microUS-targeted (Micro-US-TBx)

Patients with both positive mpMRI and Micro-US, defined as the presence of one or more lesions with PI-RADS \>= 3 and PRI-MUS \>= 3 respectively, will receive a 12-core TRUSBx in addiction to MRI-TBx and Micro-US-TBx. Patients with both negative mpMRI and Micro-US will receive a 12-core TRUSBx. Patients with only positive mpMRI will receive MRI-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx. Patients with only positive Micro-US-TBx will receive Micro-US-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men at least 18 years of age referred with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who have been advised to have a prostate biopsy
* Serum PSA ≤ 20ng/ml
* Suspected stage ≤ T2 on rectal examination (organ-confined prostate cancer)
* Fit to undergo all procedures listed in protocol
* Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior treatment for prostate cancer
* Prior diagnosis of prostate cancer
* Contraindication to MRI (e.g. claustrophobia, pacemaker, estimated GFR ≤ 50mls/min)
* Contraindication to prostate biopsy
* Men in whom artifact would reduce the quality of the MRI
* Previous hip replacement surgery, metallic hip replacement or extensive pelvic orthopaedic metal work
* Unfit to undergo any procedures listed in protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IRCCS San Raffaele

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Alberto Briganti

Full Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IRCCS San Raffaele

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

US-MIRROR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.