Multi-Center Trial of High-resolution Transrectal Ultrasound Versus Standard Low-resolution Transrectal Ultrasound for the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
NCT ID: NCT02079025
Last Updated: 2019-02-26
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1676 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-12-31
2018-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that ultra high-resolution transrectal ultrasound (UHR-TRUS) is superior to conventional low-resolution transrectal ultrasound (LR-TRUS) in detecting clinically significant cancer among men without known prostate cancer and with an indication for prostate biopsy.
The secondary objective of this study is to compare the difference in the rate of detection of clinically significant cancer between LR-TRUS and UHR-TRUS, from before investigator training to after investigator training.
The tertiary objective for the investigation is to compare the combined sensitivity and specificity in determining cancer detection overall for image-guided biopsy in UHR-TRUS vs. LR-TRUS.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transurethral Ultrasonic Imaging For Detection and Classification of Prostate Cancer
NCT02307552
Transperineal Micro-ultrasound for the Detection of Prostate Cancer During Biopsy
NCT07075705
Multiparametric Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
NCT06024772
European Multicenter Validation of PCaVision: A Head-to-Head Diagnostic Accuracy Study Comparing Multiparametric Transrectal Ultrasound to MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection
NCT06935487
Micro-Ultrasound for the Detection and Localization of Prostate Cancer Tumors in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
NCT04299620
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigation is designed as a comparative non-blinded analysis of LR-TRUS vs. UHR-TRUS. Participants will be randomized to either high-resolution or low resolution ultrasound with an equal chance of being in either group. The randomization scheme will be stratified by centre.
When a subject arrives at the institution for his biopsy, the Study Coordinator opens a sealed envelope that indicates to the study participant and physician whether the procedure will be performed using LR-TRUS or UHR-TRUS.
All subjects have an indication for prostate biopsy, and thus, inclusion of a non-treatment group would necessitate a group of men not to receive standard of care. As such, there is no control group in the subject population.
Procedures in the study are:
* obtaining informed consent for the subject
* collecting pre-biopsy information and recording it on the case report form (CRF)
* perform biopsy procedure
* record biopsy details in CRF
* prepare biopsy specimens for pathology
Data from CRFs will be stored in a proprietary database that is accessed by a web-based interface, where access is limited to those with login and password. No subject-identifiable information will be entered in the database.
The primary endpoint is the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, i.e., the number of men with clinically significant prostate cancer determined by pathology review among all men randomized and biopsied. Pathological analysis on 12-core biopsy samples will be the only mechanism used to determine if study subjects have prostate cancer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LR-TRUS
Low-resolution transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (standard of care)
Standard ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
Ultrasound guided prostate biopsy using standard of care ultrasound system
UHR-TRUS
Ultra-high resolution transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
High-resolution ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
Ultrasound guided prostate biopsy using ultra-high resolution ultrasound system
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High-resolution ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
Ultrasound guided prostate biopsy using ultra-high resolution ultrasound system
Standard ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
Ultrasound guided prostate biopsy using standard of care ultrasound system
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* PSA\<50
* Clinical stage \< cT3
Exclusion Criteria
* Men undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in the OR under anesthesia
* Men with known prostate volume (from prior imaging) of \> 60cc
* Men with anorectal abnormalities preventing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy
* Men who are unable to provide their own informed consent
40 Years
79 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Exact Imaging
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins Brady Urological Institution
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Urology of Virgina
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Prostate Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer ("CRCEO")
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rohrbach D, Wodlinger B, Wen J, Mamou J, Feleppa E. High-Frequency Quantitative Ultrasound for Imaging Prostate Cancer Using a Novel Micro-Ultrasound Scanner. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Jul;44(7):1341-1354. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-UHR-002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.