Cancer Diagnosis by Multiparametric UltraSound of the Prostate
NCT ID: NCT02712684
Last Updated: 2016-08-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-07-31
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multi-parametric Ultrasound Versus Multi-parametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection
NCT06183905
Imaging for Significant Prostate Cancer Risk Evaluation
NCT01492270
PRostate Evaluation for Clinically Important Disease: Sampling Using Image-guidance Or Not?
NCT02380027
Assessment of Prostate MRI Before Prostate Biopsies
NCT02485379
Multiparametric Ultrasound-Study for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
NCT03091231
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
multiparametric MRI. Multi-parametric ultrasound
The investigators aim to test the hypothesis that multiparametric ultrasound is able to detect clinically significant prostate cancer with an accuracy that is similar to multiparametric MRI. Multi-parametric ultrasound uses different types of ultrasound images to visualise different aspects of the tissue. In other words, the standard grey-scale images shows the gross anatomy, Power Doppler and Contrast enhanced Ultrasound image blood supply (cancers have more blood supply), and Real-Time Elastography images the density of tissue (cancers are more dense).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. PSA \</=20ng/ml measured within 6 months of screening visit
3. An understanding of the English language sufficient to understand written and verbal information about the trial and consent process
4. Estimated life expectancy of 5 years or more
5. Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Any form of hormones (except 5-alpha reductase inhibitors) within 6 months of screening visit
3. Irreversible coagulopathy predisposing to bleeding
4. Inability to undergo transrectal ultrasonography
5. Prostate volume, measured at the time of mp-USS if previously unknown, of \>60cc.
6. Previous radiation therapy to the prostate
7. Previous HIFU, cryosurgery, thermal therapy, irreversible electroporation, photodynamic, photothermal therapy, microwave or injectable toxin therapy to the prostate.
8. Transurethral resection or vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia using any energy modality within 6 months of screening visit
9. Nodal or metastatic prostate cancer on any form of imaging at any time-point
10. Not fit for general anaesthetic
11. Any other condition the investigator considers would make the patient unsuitable
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University College, London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University College London Hospitals
London, England, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Velonas VM, Woo HH, dos Remedios CG, Assinder SJ. Current status of biomarkers for prostate cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2013 May 24;14(6):11034-60. doi: 10.3390/ijms140611034.
Kirkham AP, Haslam P, Keanie JY, McCafferty I, Padhani AR, Punwani S, Richenberg J, Rottenberg G, Sohaib A, Thompson P, Turnbull LW, Kurban L, Sahdev A, Clements R, Carey BM, Allen C. Prostate MRI: who, when, and how? Report from a UK consensus meeting. Clin Radiol. 2013 Oct;68(10):1016-23. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.03.030. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
Welch HG, Albertsen PC. Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening: 1986-2005. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Oct 7;101(19):1325-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp278. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
Wilt TJ, Ahmed HU. Prostate cancer screening and the management of clinically localized disease. BMJ. 2013 Jan 29;346:f325. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f325. No abstract available.
Wei JT. Limitations of a contemporary prostate biopsy: the blind march forward. Urol Oncol. 2010 Sep-Oct;28(5):546-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.12.022.
Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Tangen CM. Prostate-specific antigen, risk factors, and prostate cancer: confounders nestled in an enigma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Sep 8;102(17):1299-301. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq313. Epub 2010 Aug 19. No abstract available.
Grey ADR, Scott R, Shah B, Acher P, Liyanage S, Pavlou M, Omar R, Chinegwundoh F, Patki P, Shah TT, Hamid S, Ghei M, Gilbert K, Campbell D, Brew-Graves C, Arumainayagam N, Chapman A, McLeavy L, Karatziou A, Alsaadi Z, Collins T, Freeman A, Eldred-Evans D, Bertoncelli-Tanaka M, Tam H, Ramachandran N, Madaan S, Winkler M, Arya M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Multiparametric ultrasound versus multiparametric MRI to diagnose prostate cancer (CADMUS): a prospective, multicentre, paired-cohort, confirmatory study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Mar;23(3):428-438. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00016-X.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15/0473
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.