Comparison of Scores for Early Brain Damage Assessment at Intensive Care Unit Admission After Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

NCT ID: NCT04167891

Last Updated: 2024-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1144 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Even in patients with successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), outcome after cardiac arrest remains poor. The overall in-hospital survival rate widely varies both worldwide and across communities, from 1 to 4 folds according to circumstances of arrest and post-resuscitation interventions. Several studies have already shown that early interventions performed after ROSC, such as treatment of the cause, targeted temperature management, optimal hemodynamic management and extra-corporeal life support in selected patients, could improve the outcome in post-cardiac arrest patients. However, the decision process regarding the allocation of these resources, in parallel with the management of patients' proxies, remains a complex challenge for physicians facing these situations. Consequently, several prediction models and scores have been developed in order to stratify the risk of unfavorable outcome and to discriminate the best candidates for post-resuscitation interventions. Overall, several scores exist, but external validation are lacking and direct comparisons are needed to assess relative interest of scoring systems. Indeed, establishing the optimal scoring system is crucial, for optimal treatment allocation and appropriate information to relatives.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Arrest

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients admitted in the intensive care unit

Patients with return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest regardless of initial rhythm, and admitted in intensive care unit for post cardiac arrest care

Calculation of early prognosis score

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Early prognosis score will be calculated at intensive care unit admission for each patient based on clinical and biological values as required

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Calculation of early prognosis score

Early prognosis score will be calculated at intensive care unit admission for each patient based on clinical and biological values as required

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- All adult patients, major, admitted to intensive care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and comatose (defined by Glasgow score ≤ 8) on admission.

Exclusion Criteria

* cardiac arrest occurring intra-hospital,
* minor patient,
* major patient under guardianship,
* protected persons,
* prior inclusion in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AfterROSC

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alain Cariou, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

AfterROSC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ERASME

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

CHU Amiens

Amiens, , France

Site Status

CHU Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

CH Bethune

Béthune, , France

Site Status

CHU Ambroise Paré

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status

CH Brive La Gaillard

Brive-la-Gaillarde, , France

Site Status

CH Cherbourg en Cotentin

Cherbourg, , France

Site Status

CHU Créteil

Créteil, , France

Site Status

CHD Vendée

La Roche-sur-Yon, , France

Site Status

CH La Rochelle

La Rochelle, , France

Site Status

CH Versailles

Le Chesnay, , France

Site Status

CH Le Mans

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

CHU Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hospices Civils Lyon

Lyon, , France

Site Status

APHM

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Hopital Privé Jacques Cartier

Massy, , France

Site Status

CHU Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CHRU Nancy

Nancy, , France

Site Status

CHU Nantes

Nantes, , France

Site Status

APHP, CHU Necker

Paris, , France

Site Status

APHP, CHU Saint Louis

Paris, , France

Site Status

Aphp, Hegp

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Cochin

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Lariboisière

Paris, , France

Site Status

GHP Saint Joseph

Paris, , France

Site Status

Clinique Privé Claude Galien

Quincy-sous-Sénart, , France

Site Status

CH Toulon

Toulon, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Renaudier M, Lascarrou JB, Chelly J, Lesieur O, Bourenne J, Jaubert P, Paul M, Muller G, Leprovost P, Klein T, Yansli M, Daubin C, Petit M, Pichon N, Cour M, Sboui G, Geri G, Cariou A, Bougouin W. Fluid balance and outcome in cardiac arrest patients admitted to intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2025 Apr 14;29(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05391-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40229890 (View on PubMed)

Lascarrou JB, Bougouin W, Chelly J, Bourenne J, Daubin C, Lesieur O, Asfar P, Colin G, Paul M, Chudeau N, Muller G, Geri G, Jacquier S, Pichon N, Klein T, Sauneuf B, Klouche K, Cour M, Sejourne C, Annoni F, Raphalen JH, Galbois A, Bruel C, Mongardon N, Aissaoui N, Deye N, Maizel J, Dumas F, Legriel S, Cariou A; AfterROSC Network. Prospective comparison of prognostic scores for prediction of outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: results of the AfterROSC1 multicentric study. Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Oct 11;13(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01195-w.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37819544 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AfterROSC1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.