The Systematic Approach for Identification of Cause Among Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors
NCT ID: NCT06012838
Last Updated: 2023-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-10
2022-11-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Sixteen Emergency Medicine Residents from National Taiwan University Hospital participated in this study. The cause classification of OHCA (CCCA) protocol was developed by an expert cardiac arrest committee, and a lecture concerning the Utstein's template, the epidemiology of cardiac arrest and the CCCA protocol was addressed. Pre-/post-lecture questionnaires regarding self-assessed diagnostic certainty and knowledge of cardiac arrest were obtained and compared to evaluate participants' learning effectiveness. To validate the efficiency of protocol, medical records of 586 non-traumatic OHCA adults with successful resuscitation and ICU admission were reviewed retrospectively, and the OHCA cause of each patient was identified by the trained residents following CCCA protocol. The primary outcome was the diagnostic consistency between protocolized diagnosis, expert diagnosis and the discharge diagnosis
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Holistic Health Care of Post-Cardiac Arrest Survivors: From Patient's Health to Family Resilience
NCT04859270
Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) Biomarkers
NCT03112486
Transitions Between Clinical Circulatory States After Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
NCT02648061
Comparison of Scores for Early Brain Damage Assessment at Intensive Care Unit Admission After Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
NCT04167891
A Survey of Factors Associated With the Successful Recognition of Agonal Breathing and Cardiac Arrest.
NCT00848588
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Residents from emergency department of National Taiwan University Hospital participated the program and received the lecture concerning the Utstein's template, the epidemiology of cardiac arrest, interpretation of examinations, and the CCCA protocol. To evaluate the learning effect of the lecture, pre-lecture and post-lecture questionnaire were designed, which included the knowledge for OHCA classification, confidence for correct diagnosis during CPR and after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and the mandatory examinations for cause identification. Confidence level more than 50% was recognized as sufficient to make proper cause identification. The enrolled residents were asked to review the medical records of 3 non-traumatic adult OHCA patients before lecture and identified the OHCA cause by their own without the assist of the CCCA protocol. After lecture, another 3 medical records were reviewed by the participants with the use of the CCAC protocol. The consistency of OHCA cause between young physicians were evaluated before and after lecture, respectively.
To validate the efficiency of the CCCA protocol, these trained residents further identified the arrest cause of 586 non-traumatic adult OHCA patients who survived to ICU admission from January 2015 to July 2021 in NTUH following the established protocol.
The primary outcome was the consistency of OHCA cause between protocolized diagnosis, expert diagnosis and the discharge diagnosis. The diagnosis made by young physicians with protocol defined as protocolized diagnosis. The expert physician is an experienced emergency physicians specialized in both emergency and critical care, who has reviewed the medical records without the assistance of the established CCCA protocol. Expert diagnosis was recognized as diagnosis identified by expert physician. The discharge diagnosis is the major diagnosis related to index cardiac arrest.
Categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages) and evaluated by the Chi-Squared test. The continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The Light's kappa was used to evaluate the consistency of OHCA classification. The value ≤ 0.40 indicates minimal agreement, while value ≥ 0.80 represent strong and almost perfect consistency16-17. The statistical significance was set at p \<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences Statistics (version 21.0; IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
cause classification of OHCA protocol
The cause classification of OHCA protocol was developed by an expert cardiac arrest committee. A lecture concerning the Utstein's template, the epidemiology of cardiac arrest and the CCCA protocol was addressed to the participants.
Cause classification of OHCA protocol
training program with cause classification of OHCA protocol
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cause classification of OHCA protocol
training program with cause classification of OHCA protocol
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Min-Shan Tsai, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Taiwan University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei County, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202207125RIND
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.